Page 1 of 2
Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:56 pm
by a-rod
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:31 pm
by RIPskaterdude
LIN.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:05 pm
by SadKingsFan
Ugh without Tyreke we are so damn boring. Couldn't care less about this one. Should be interesting to see if Hawes can actually put a couple of games together.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:16 pm
by RIPskaterdude
SadKingsFan wrote:Ugh without Tyreke we are so damn boring. Couldn't care less about this one. Should be interesting to see if Hawes can actually put a couple of games together.
Watch, Hawes picks it up and plays amazing until the end of the season, leading us to not pick a PF/C in the draft.

Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:48 pm
by a-rod
SadKingsFan wrote:Ugh without Tyreke we are so damn boring. Couldn't care less about this one. Should be interesting to see if Hawes can actually put a couple of games together.
Actually With out Evans We do a very good job working within the context of the offense and using ball movement to get open looks.
When Evans learn to shoot and make the extra pass, this team going to be unstoppable.
I like ball movement, I dont like relying on one player...
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:13 pm
by cuad
Well I didn't watch the first quarter at all because I'm working on my final project for my computer class, and guess what happens? SPENCER HAWES GRABS SEVEN BOARDS IN THE FIRST QUARTER.
Honestly, this is ridiculous.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:16 pm
by RIPskaterdude
cuad wrote:Well I didn't watch the first quarter at all because I'm working on my final project for my computer class, and guess what happens? SPENCER HAWES GRABS SEVEN BOARDS IN THE FIRST QUARTER.
Honestly, this is ridiculous.
You know what this means, right?
Spencer Hawes only does good when you're not watching.

Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:18 pm
by Wolfay
a-rod wrote:SadKingsFan wrote:Ugh without Tyreke we are so damn boring. Couldn't care less about this one. Should be interesting to see if Hawes can actually put a couple of games together.
Actually With out Evans We do a very good job working within the context of the offense and using ball movement to get open looks.
When Evans learn to shoot and
make the extra pass, this team going to be unstoppable.
I like ball movement, I dont like relying on one player...
He's been doing that consistently, it's just that often they miss the shot or they dribble it away, otherwise Evans would have multiple 10+ assist games. You just choose to be blind to it.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:53 pm
by a-rod
Wolfay wrote:a-rod wrote:SadKingsFan wrote:Ugh without Tyreke we are so damn boring. Couldn't care less about this one. Should be interesting to see if Hawes can actually put a couple of games together.
Actually With out Evans We do a very good job working within the context of the offense and using ball movement to get open looks.
When Evans learn to shoot and
make the extra pass, this team going to be unstoppable.
I like ball movement, I dont like relying on one player...
He's been doing that consistently, it's just that often they miss the shot or they dribble it away, otherwise Evans would have multiple 10+ assist games.
You just choose to be blind to it.
No, i dont. if the passer doesn't have an effective jump shot allow him to keep the defense honest,the extra pass is not going to be effective.
Thats why if Evans learn to shoot and move without the ball, hes going to be unstoppable.
Evans would have multiple 10+ assist games.
thats not necessarily a good thing, like i said I dont like relying on one player...
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:54 pm
by SacKingZZZ
Good to see this team feeding Landry and getting out of the way.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:10 pm
by Wolfay
This is laughable. You're just wrong a-rod, and I think most posters with a brain would agree with me. All too often Tyreke passes to somebody WIDE-OPEN and they brick it. It's not Tyreke's fault that the rest of the team stinks like ass.
And before you point to this game as proof that you aren't loony, we're winning right now because our ass doesn't smell as bad as the Clippers'. People can smell the Clippers all around the globe.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:00 pm
by bjax24
What a crazy gamethread 10 replies all game.
Beno! He once again proves my pre season view of him wrong. And I could not be happier to be wrong.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:02 pm
by KingInExile
Nice way to steal a win on the road. Yeah, it was the Clips, but a win's a win. And a win with your best player out due to injury makes it even nicer.
Bring on the Griz.
Now back to my nap.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:03 pm
by Geoff35
20 points and 17 assists.... ill take it Beno.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:11 pm
by a-rod
a-rod wrote:Actually With out Evans We do a very good job working within the context of the offense and using ball movement to get open looks.
When Evans learn to shoot and make the extra pass, this team going to be unstoppable.
I like ball movement, I dont like relying on one player...
32 assists, we did the same thing against the lakers....
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore;_y ... 2010010113
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:21 pm
by pillwenney
Well crap. I missed the game and already know the score (didn't know it was on this early). But I recorded a later version, so I'll be back with my thoughts much later on tonight.
Wolfay wrote:This is laughable. You're just wrong a-rod, and I think most posters with a brain would agree with me. All too often Tyreke passes to somebody WIDE-OPEN and they brick it. It's not Tyreke's fault that the rest of the team stinks like ass.
And before you point to this game as proof that you aren't loony, we're winning right now because our ass doesn't smell as bad as the Clippers'. People can smell the Clippers all around the globe.
Not necessary dude. Come on.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:22 pm
by _SRV_
A-rod, I think it has more to do with Udrih having amazing games, I always said that Udrih is essential to having free flowing offense, he knows where to be, when to push and doesn't demand the ball as much as the conventional PGs, the thing is, we've tried this kind of game for a long time, and the bottom line is that we never achieved anything w/o a go to scorer and it was very clear, especially in end game scenarios and when defenses tightened.
I love the Evans/Udrih back court, and I believe that with time, and more experience to Evans, the two can reach a balance that benefits the team.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:52 pm
by Wolfay
mitchweber wrote:Well crap. I missed the game and already know the score (didn't know it was on this early). But I recorded a later version, so I'll be back with my thoughts much later on tonight.
Wolfay wrote:This is laughable. You're just wrong a-rod, and I think most posters with a brain would agree with me. All too often Tyreke passes to somebody WIDE-OPEN and they brick it. It's not Tyreke's fault that the rest of the team stinks like ass.
And before you point to this game as proof that you aren't loony, we're winning right now because our ass doesn't smell as bad as the Clippers'. People can smell the Clippers all around the globe.
Not necessary dude. Come on.
I apologize a-rod. I still think you're wrong though. Evans moves the ball just fine considering he's a rookie. It's not as bad as you think.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:54 pm
by cuad
Smillls would have loved this.
IF YOU SLEEP ON BENO, HE CAN DROP 20 AND 20 ON YOU.
Re: Sacramento (23-46) @ Los Angeles (26-43)
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:28 am
by RIPskaterdude
When did we trade Beno for Steve Nash?
