The-Power wrote:JMAC3 wrote:I think Murray Boyles is pretty overrated, he averaged 2.4 apg, Draymond averaged 4.1 as junior and 3.8 apg a senior.
Just from watching him, I think it's pretty obvious that CMB is a good passer. He just happened to be on a terrible team starved for any kind of offensive talent. Hard to take the raw numbers as an indication of ability for him.SNPA wrote:Fleming ends up a 6’9’’ and 240lbs PF who shoots threes and collects stocks.
What am I missing?
Why is this guy ranked often in the 20s? Isn’t this guy an out of the box NBA rotational PF?
I would also draft him higher but I'll point out that his shooting is still a bit of a question mark, and it's not quite clear if he can make a positive impact when his shot isn't falling and when he's forced to make decisions.
–––
On the question: I think they are in a similar range for me (and I like both of them). CMB is the more talented basketball player but Fleming has an easier path to a clear NBA role. In the range where I'd pick them (probably late lottery but I haven't finalized my board yet) I could see team need factoring into the decision. Gun to my head I think I'd roll the dice on the better basketball player in CMB and hope he uses his natural talent to develop well and can carve out a consistent role.
It is hard to draft a guy that has caveats who doesn't project as an allstar. That is the main issue with CMB to me, he is 4 man who can't shoot at all, so you either are playing him as a small ball 5 and running out a super small team, or you have to pair him with a shooting 5 or your offense likely doesn't work. That is a tall task for me if I am drafting you 13th to then have to consider you in every future roster construction decision.




