Hansen Yang
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 799
- And1: 612
- Joined: May 03, 2010
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: Hansen Yang
I see some flashes of Domantas Sabonis. Moreso in how he reads the floor and his little ball fakes at the top near the key looking for a cutter or a DHO.
Being a Blazer fan isn't exactly healthy.
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,906
- And1: 2,341
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Hansen Yang
He has a lot of skill, and can't teach those measurables. He shows flashes in other areas, but like his physicality as well. I could sure see him getting into better shape once he's playing in the NBA instead of China.
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,903
- And1: 8,285
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Hansen Yang
SNPA wrote:
I’ve looked into him more. I think he goes first round. He is a Klutch client.
Yeah so…
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,072
- And1: 794
- Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Re: Hansen Yang
Well this is a lot higher than I thought, also weird team to pick him even if you don't think Clingan can be a big minutes guy.
He's certainly a interesting talent skill set, the problem is that these days the Chinse program's physical development programms are way behind the US and even Europe (like general atheltcism training stuff, they're basically still doing old school 1970s ****.) which if you look on the bright side might mean he could end up looking a lot more athletic in a few years with proper training I suppose.
He's certainly a interesting talent skill set, the problem is that these days the Chinse program's physical development programms are way behind the US and even Europe (like general atheltcism training stuff, they're basically still doing old school 1970s ****.) which if you look on the bright side might mean he could end up looking a lot more athletic in a few years with proper training I suppose.
The river of time wash away all heroes
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,470
- And1: 9,893
- Joined: Jan 03, 2014
- Location: Germany
-
Re: Hansen Yang
Whether he was drafted too high or not remains to be seen. But I don't really understand the reasoning for Portland with Clingan already on the roster. So you drafted two positionally locked Centers and just hope that one of the two pans out?
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- Senior
- Posts: 719
- And1: 327
- Joined: Oct 18, 2008
Re: Hansen Yang
The-Power wrote:Whether he was drafted too high or not remains to be seen. But I don't really understand the reasoning for Portland with Clingan already on the roster. So you drafted two positionally locked Centers and just hope that one of the two pans out?
Technically that's what Denver did with Jokic and Nurkic.
Obviously, there is close to zero change either one of them is ever discussed in the same stratosphere as jokic, but they seem to be pretty high on both of these guys and let's face it, DA is an expiring, RW3 is not someone you plan around and Duop Reath is probably not making it to next year, so that's at the very least their 2 center rotation for a couple of years from now.
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,470
- And1: 9,893
- Joined: Jan 03, 2014
- Location: Germany
-
Re: Hansen Yang
andalusian wrote:The-Power wrote:Whether he was drafted too high or not remains to be seen. But I don't really understand the reasoning for Portland with Clingan already on the roster. So you drafted two positionally locked Centers and just hope that one of the two pans out?
Technically that's what Denver did with Jokic and Nurkic.
Yeah, but a lot of people questioned the roster construction once Jokic proved he should play a lot of minutes and Nurkic ended up being moved due to the poor roster fit. And keep in mind that Jokic was a SRP, which makes this entirely different simply from the asset management perspective.
In an ideal scenario, both show great potential as they split minutes. The one more likely to be a top-player on a good team then stays while the other is moved for value or a better fit. So it can still work out well, of course. It's just odd to target two players with relatively high picks in consecutive drafts when you already know that they will never be able to share the floor for extended minutes. It's certainly not a common approach to drafting.
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- Senior
- Posts: 719
- And1: 327
- Joined: Oct 18, 2008
Re: Hansen Yang
The-Power wrote:
In an ideal scenario, both show great potential as they split minutes. The one more likely to be a top-player on a good team then stays while the other is moved for value or a better fit. So it can still work out well, of course. It's just odd to target two players with relatively high picks in consecutive drafts when you already know that they will never be able to share the floor for extended minutes. It's certainly not a common approach to drafting.
I guess you can look at it like that, or you can look at it as a simple "BPA" approach given that Portland seems to be more certain (rightfully or not) about their back-court situation (a good Vet and 2 very young guards they believe in) and wings (a decent Vet, several young wings/forwards they believe in). They clearly do not see RW3 as a safe long term solution and are likely ready to move on from their DA experiment - so spending draft assets on bigs with the hope that at least one of them hits - is not that crazy of an idea.
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,169
- And1: 9,690
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Hansen Yang
I think Yang has some interesting, arguably rare tools.
But DC had a very nice rookie campaign and now best-case you invested either pick 7 or pick 16 in a backup position locked C.
I mostly disagree with this pick b/c I am a huge DC believer.
But DC had a very nice rookie campaign and now best-case you invested either pick 7 or pick 16 in a backup position locked C.
I mostly disagree with this pick b/c I am a huge DC believer.
Re: Hansen Yang
- azcatz11
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,878
- And1: 33,857
- Joined: Apr 13, 2017
- Location: Phoenix
-
Re: Hansen Yang
Blazers are a joke franchise
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,813
- And1: 2,163
- Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Re: Hansen Yang
He has some Jokic to him..
Re: Hansen Yang
- eminence
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,772
- And1: 11,603
- Joined: Mar 07, 2015
Re: Hansen Yang
Investing #16 in a guy you see as a decent to high end bench guy is a reasonable move imo.
Whether Yang is that guy... ehh, we'll see.
Whether Yang is that guy... ehh, we'll see.
I bought a boat.
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,302
- And1: 13,623
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Hansen Yang
azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise
So is Detroit.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Hansen Yang
- azcatz11
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,878
- And1: 33,857
- Joined: Apr 13, 2017
- Location: Phoenix
-
Re: Hansen Yang
JRoy wrote:azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise
So is Detroit.
Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,302
- And1: 13,623
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Hansen Yang
azcatz11 wrote:JRoy wrote:azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise
So is Detroit.
Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?
That is a great and valid question.
Supposedly the FO thought that was the latest safe pick to draft before another team (possibly BKN) selected him.
That’s just hearsay, no idea if it is true or not.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- Senior
- Posts: 719
- And1: 327
- Joined: Oct 18, 2008
Re: Hansen Yang
azcatz11 wrote:JRoy wrote:azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise
So is Detroit.
Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?
All indications were that Minnesota wanted him at 17 (their GM drafted jokic) and from my understanding he (Yang) believed the Nets were going to take him in the first round. Blazers GM said he was the target and they didn't think they would get him lower than 16 which seems to agree with the Minnesota rumors
Re: Hansen Yang
- azcatz11
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,878
- And1: 33,857
- Joined: Apr 13, 2017
- Location: Phoenix
-
Re: Hansen Yang
JRoy wrote:azcatz11 wrote:JRoy wrote:
So is Detroit.
Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?
That is a great and valid question.
Supposedly the FO thought that was the latest safe pick to draft before another team (possibly BKN) selected him.
That’s just hearsay, no idea if it is true or not.
I understand BPa but now we have a logjam at C. So either drafted clingans backup or his replacement and he’s a wasted pick. I don’t get it
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,302
- And1: 13,623
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Hansen Yang
azcatz11 wrote:JRoy wrote:azcatz11 wrote:
Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?
That is a great and valid question.
Supposedly the FO thought that was the latest safe pick to draft before another team (possibly BKN) selected him.
That’s just hearsay, no idea if it is true or not.
I understand BPa but now we have a logjam at C. So either drafted clingans backup or his replacement and he’s a wasted pick. I don’t get it
Ayton likely has no future in POR past this season and RW is completely unreliable due to health. Reath is irrelevant. Clingan and Yang can split minutes at C starting next year and we can see how it looks then.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Hansen Yang
- EvanZ
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,394
- And1: 3,953
- Joined: Apr 06, 2011
Re: Hansen Yang
azcatz11 wrote:JRoy wrote:azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise
So is Detroit.
Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?
I had a first round grade on him. I assume other teams did as well. The answer is they liked him a lot.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:
https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
Re: Hansen Yang
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,262
- And1: 6,041
- Joined: Jul 19, 2013
-
Re: Hansen Yang
I saw the same about MIN and BRK, which indicates to me that the league saw him as a legit FRP. He’s super interesting, I hope he pans out. And I don’t totally hate the idea of just playing him and Clingan 24 mpg for a few years given that both players seem at this point like they’d struggle playing big minutes. If both of them look like they deserve more than that then that’s a good problem to have