Hansen Yang

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

deepeeenn
Pro Prospect
Posts: 799
And1: 612
Joined: May 03, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
 

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#101 » by deepeeenn » Mon May 26, 2025 8:05 am

I see some flashes of Domantas Sabonis. Moreso in how he reads the floor and his little ball fakes at the top near the key looking for a cutter or a DHO.
Being a Blazer fan isn't exactly healthy.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,906
And1: 2,341
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#102 » by moss_is_1 » Mon May 26, 2025 5:56 pm

He has a lot of skill, and can't teach those measurables. He shows flashes in other areas, but like his physicality as well. I could sure see him getting into better shape once he's playing in the NBA instead of China.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 8,903
And1: 8,285
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#103 » by SNPA » Thu Jun 26, 2025 2:42 am

SNPA wrote:
FarBeyondDriven wrote:
Read on Twitter


he's in

I’ve looked into him more. I think he goes first round. He is a Klutch client.

Yeah so…
RollingWave
Starter
Posts: 2,072
And1: 794
Joined: Apr 06, 2006

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#104 » by RollingWave » Thu Jun 26, 2025 5:14 am

Well this is a lot higher than I thought, also weird team to pick him even if you don't think Clingan can be a big minutes guy.

He's certainly a interesting talent skill set, the problem is that these days the Chinse program's physical development programms are way behind the US and even Europe (like general atheltcism training stuff, they're basically still doing old school 1970s ****.) which if you look on the bright side might mean he could end up looking a lot more athletic in a few years with proper training I suppose.
The river of time wash away all heroes
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,470
And1: 9,893
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#105 » by The-Power » Thu Jun 26, 2025 7:34 am

Whether he was drafted too high or not remains to be seen. But I don't really understand the reasoning for Portland with Clingan already on the roster. So you drafted two positionally locked Centers and just hope that one of the two pans out?
andalusian
Senior
Posts: 719
And1: 327
Joined: Oct 18, 2008

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#106 » by andalusian » Thu Jun 26, 2025 1:28 pm

The-Power wrote:Whether he was drafted too high or not remains to be seen. But I don't really understand the reasoning for Portland with Clingan already on the roster. So you drafted two positionally locked Centers and just hope that one of the two pans out?


Technically that's what Denver did with Jokic and Nurkic.

Obviously, there is close to zero change either one of them is ever discussed in the same stratosphere as jokic, but they seem to be pretty high on both of these guys and let's face it, DA is an expiring, RW3 is not someone you plan around and Duop Reath is probably not making it to next year, so that's at the very least their 2 center rotation for a couple of years from now.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,470
And1: 9,893
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#107 » by The-Power » Thu Jun 26, 2025 1:38 pm

andalusian wrote:
The-Power wrote:Whether he was drafted too high or not remains to be seen. But I don't really understand the reasoning for Portland with Clingan already on the roster. So you drafted two positionally locked Centers and just hope that one of the two pans out?


Technically that's what Denver did with Jokic and Nurkic.

Yeah, but a lot of people questioned the roster construction once Jokic proved he should play a lot of minutes and Nurkic ended up being moved due to the poor roster fit. And keep in mind that Jokic was a SRP, which makes this entirely different simply from the asset management perspective.

In an ideal scenario, both show great potential as they split minutes. The one more likely to be a top-player on a good team then stays while the other is moved for value or a better fit. So it can still work out well, of course. It's just odd to target two players with relatively high picks in consecutive drafts when you already know that they will never be able to share the floor for extended minutes. It's certainly not a common approach to drafting.
andalusian
Senior
Posts: 719
And1: 327
Joined: Oct 18, 2008

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#108 » by andalusian » Thu Jun 26, 2025 1:55 pm

The-Power wrote:
In an ideal scenario, both show great potential as they split minutes. The one more likely to be a top-player on a good team then stays while the other is moved for value or a better fit. So it can still work out well, of course. It's just odd to target two players with relatively high picks in consecutive drafts when you already know that they will never be able to share the floor for extended minutes. It's certainly not a common approach to drafting.


I guess you can look at it like that, or you can look at it as a simple "BPA" approach given that Portland seems to be more certain (rightfully or not) about their back-court situation (a good Vet and 2 very young guards they believe in) and wings (a decent Vet, several young wings/forwards they believe in). They clearly do not see RW3 as a safe long term solution and are likely ready to move on from their DA experiment - so spending draft assets on bigs with the hope that at least one of them hits - is not that crazy of an idea.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,169
And1: 9,690
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#109 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Jun 26, 2025 4:00 pm

I think Yang has some interesting, arguably rare tools.

But DC had a very nice rookie campaign and now best-case you invested either pick 7 or pick 16 in a backup position locked C.

I mostly disagree with this pick b/c I am a huge DC believer.
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 29,878
And1: 33,857
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#110 » by azcatz11 » Thu Jun 26, 2025 4:33 pm

Blazers are a joke franchise
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,813
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#111 » by Upperclass » Thu Jun 26, 2025 4:33 pm

He has some Jokic to him..
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,772
And1: 11,603
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#112 » by eminence » Thu Jun 26, 2025 4:33 pm

Investing #16 in a guy you see as a decent to high end bench guy is a reasonable move imo.

Whether Yang is that guy... ehh, we'll see.
I bought a boat.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,302
And1: 13,623
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#113 » by JRoy » Thu Jun 26, 2025 5:47 pm

azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise


So is Detroit.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 29,878
And1: 33,857
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#114 » by azcatz11 » Thu Jun 26, 2025 5:51 pm

JRoy wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise


So is Detroit.


Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,302
And1: 13,623
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#115 » by JRoy » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:05 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise


So is Detroit.


Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?


That is a great and valid question.

Supposedly the FO thought that was the latest safe pick to draft before another team (possibly BKN) selected him.

That’s just hearsay, no idea if it is true or not.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
andalusian
Senior
Posts: 719
And1: 327
Joined: Oct 18, 2008

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#116 » by andalusian » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:06 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise


So is Detroit.


Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?

All indications were that Minnesota wanted him at 17 (their GM drafted jokic) and from my understanding he (Yang) believed the Nets were going to take him in the first round. Blazers GM said he was the target and they didn't think they would get him lower than 16 which seems to agree with the Minnesota rumors
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 29,878
And1: 33,857
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#117 » by azcatz11 » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:12 pm

JRoy wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
So is Detroit.


Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?


That is a great and valid question.

Supposedly the FO thought that was the latest safe pick to draft before another team (possibly BKN) selected him.

That’s just hearsay, no idea if it is true or not.


I understand BPa but now we have a logjam at C. So either drafted clingans backup or his replacement and he’s a wasted pick. I don’t get it
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,302
And1: 13,623
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#118 » by JRoy » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:18 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?


That is a great and valid question.

Supposedly the FO thought that was the latest safe pick to draft before another team (possibly BKN) selected him.

That’s just hearsay, no idea if it is true or not.


I understand BPa but now we have a logjam at C. So either drafted clingans backup or his replacement and he’s a wasted pick. I don’t get it


Ayton likely has no future in POR past this season and RW is completely unreliable due to health. Reath is irrelevant. Clingan and Yang can split minutes at C starting next year and we can see how it looks then.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,394
And1: 3,953
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#119 » by EvanZ » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:38 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Blazers are a joke franchise


So is Detroit.


Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?


I had a first round grade on him. I assume other teams did as well. The answer is they liked him a lot.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
Saints14
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,262
And1: 6,041
Joined: Jul 19, 2013
 

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#120 » by Saints14 » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:38 pm

I saw the same about MIN and BRK, which indicates to me that the league saw him as a legit FRP. He’s super interesting, I hope he pans out. And I don’t totally hate the idea of just playing him and Clingan 24 mpg for a few years given that both players seem at this point like they’d struggle playing big minutes. If both of them look like they deserve more than that then that’s a good problem to have

Return to NBA Draft