nolang1 wrote:SlowPaced wrote:Another way of looking at it is that Trae won't be depended on doing everything in the NBA, which would mean less turnovers and less bad shots. He's everything for Oklahoma this season and he managed to take a 11-20 team to 14-3 so far.
Last year Oklahoma played the 2nd-toughest schedule in the country, lost 8 games by 5 points or fewer, and brought everyone back except the point guard that Young replaced (and added another freshman who's started every game). Not as massive a turnaround as simply comparing the records makes it seem.
Young is good enough that you can evaluate him on his own merits without having to pretend he joined this downtrodden team. Their next five highest guys in three-point attempts after Young were shooting 44, 43, 38, 41, and 40 percent going into tonight; that's good no matter who's setting you up. OU was 39th in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency last season, and given the number of minutes returning they've got some competent defenders surrounding Young.
That description of his team does sound similar to Orlando's squad. Fournier, Gordon, Ross, and Vuc(occasionally) can all hit the 3 at a good %. Defense would be a little more suspect, though Orlando has the players to make it work (Isaac, Biz, Gordon, Ross, etc). The P&R would work with Gordon, Isaac, and Vuc as all 3 have range. I'm skeptical of Young because of how fast he's shot up the ranks, but I was all for Tatum last year for Orlando's 1st pick for similar reasons, and I actually preferred him over JJax, Fox, Ball, Fultz, etc. I'll be watching him closely from here on out, to say the least.