https://stats.nba.com/players/drives/?sort=DRIVES&dir=1&Season=2018-19&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&LastNGames=11
jayu70 wrote:
Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831
jayu70 wrote:
King Ken wrote:Trae is technically 3rd in drives per game with a 3.6 ast and 1.6 to rate with a higher FG% than James Harden in the last 11 games.
https://stats.nba.com/players/drives/?sort=DRIVES&dir=1&Season=2018-19&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&LastNGames=11jayu70 wrote:

916fan wrote:Passing up on Doncic will always sting, but it doesn't mean Young or Bagley can't become good players with time.

Jamaaliver wrote:916fan wrote:Passing up on Doncic will always sting, but it doesn't mean Young or Bagley can't become good players with time.
![]()
Wiser words were never spoken.
Also, we got an extra lottery pick.
That helps salve the wound just a bit.

Stillwater wrote:So the Hawks valued a future asset over a potential generational talent in Luka, settling on Young for his court vision ?
They can't be so naive to think Young will become any kind of decent defender and won't always be a liability in that area.
As far as the 3's it won't ever be consistent... he still has a low release and needs way to much space
BTW that pick aint looking too good either
Jamaaliver wrote:Stillwater wrote:So the Hawks valued a future asset over a potential generational talent in Luka, settling on Young for his court vision ?
They can't be so naive to think Young will become any kind of decent defender and won't always be a liability in that area.
As far as the 3's it won't ever be consistent... he still has a low release and needs way to much space
BTW that pick aint looking too good either
I won't re-litigate the decision again.
And I admit Luka is undeniably the better player.
But we wanted as many bites at the apple as possible to build a team around a collection of players that perfectly complement each other.
We got a top end initiator and it look like we'll have 2 more lottery picks this summer.
Dallas got a great player...but don't have much around him.
Time will tell which approach is wiser -- a team built on a half dozen lottery selections. Or a team built exclusively around Luka.

Stillwater wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:916fan wrote:Passing up on Doncic will always sting, but it doesn't mean Young or Bagley can't become good players with time.
![]()
Wiser words were never spoken.
Also, we got an extra lottery pick.
That helps salve the wound just a bit.
So the Hawks valued a future asset over a potential generational talent in Luka, settling on Young for his court vision ?
They can't be so naive to think Young will become any kind of decent defender and won't always be a liability in that area.
As far as the 3's it won't ever be consistent... he still has a low release and needs way to much space
BTW that pick aint looking too good either
Atlhawks09 wrote:Stillwater wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:
![]()
Wiser words were never spoken.
Also, we got an extra lottery pick.
That helps salve the wound just a bit.
So the Hawks valued a future asset over a potential generational talent in Luka, settling on Young for his court vision ?
They can't be so naive to think Young will become any kind of decent defender and won't always be a liability in that area.
As far as the 3's it won't ever be consistent... he still has a low release and needs way to much space
BTW that pick aint looking too good either
That is an opinion and not a fact.
Mavs have lost 10 of 13 and are 1 game from having the 7th worst record so not sure why it isn’t looking good.

King Ken wrote:This is a Trae Young thread. Why does Luka always have to come up. He is playing well in comparison to other elite true PGs as a rookie. Luka is a tremendous rookie but Trae is as well for his position and what is asked from him
atlantabbq99 wrote:King Ken wrote:This is a Trae Young thread. Why does Luka always have to come up. He is playing well in comparison to other elite true PGs as a rookie. Luka is a tremendous rookie but Trae is as well for his position and what is asked from him
It's the same reason why Michael Jordan's name always comes up when you talk about Sam Bowie, or why Chris Paul's name comes up when you talk about Marvin Williams.
Trae will have to be as good as Hakeem if he wants the link to stop.
King Ken wrote:atlantabbq99 wrote:King Ken wrote:This is a Trae Young thread. Why does Luka always have to come up. He is playing well in comparison to other elite true PGs as a rookie. Luka is a tremendous rookie but Trae is as well for his position and what is asked from him
It's the same reason why Michael Jordan's name always comes up when you talk about Sam Bowie, or why Chris Paul's name comes up when you talk about Marvin Williams.
Trae will have to be as good as Hakeem if he wants the link to stop.
Stop it! Marvin **** sucked and always sucked Trae looks like a future star PG. Honestly, Doncic doesn't look like LeBron or anything. His defense is meh and he actually knows what he is doing. It's not like he gets lost like Trae or all of the other rookies. He just lacks the ability. Trae is going to be great. I just hate this stupid ass link. Trae should be compared to other PG's of high caliber.
Bowie had injuries. He is more Oden than anything.
atlantabbq99 wrote:King Ken wrote:atlantabbq99 wrote:
It's the same reason why Michael Jordan's name always comes up when you talk about Sam Bowie, or why Chris Paul's name comes up when you talk about Marvin Williams.
Trae will have to be as good as Hakeem if he wants the link to stop.
Stop it! Marvin **** sucked and always sucked Trae looks like a future star PG. Honestly, Doncic doesn't look like LeBron or anything. His defense is meh and he actually knows what he is doing. It's not like he gets lost like Trae or all of the other rookies. He just lacks the ability. Trae is going to be great. I just hate this stupid ass link. Trae should be compared to other PG's of high caliber.
Bowie had injuries. He is more Oden than anything.
I never said that Doncic is Lebron. I always said that Doncic could be a poor man's Magic or Larry.
He looks like a young Harden or Joe Johnson now, but their is still a 10% chance he can become a full blow Larry Bird.


Stillwater wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:916fan wrote:Passing up on Doncic will always sting, but it doesn't mean Young or Bagley can't become good players with time.
![]()
Wiser words were never spoken.
Also, we got an extra lottery pick.
That helps salve the wound just a bit.
So the Hawks valued a future asset over a potential generational talent in Luka, settling on Young for his court vision ?
They can't be so naive to think Young will become any kind of decent defender and won't always be a liability in that area.
As far as the 3's it won't ever be consistent... he still has a low release and needs way to much space
BTW that pick aint looking too good either
nolang1 wrote:Stillwater wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:
![]()
Wiser words were never spoken.
Also, we got an extra lottery pick.
That helps salve the wound just a bit.
So the Hawks valued a future asset over a potential generational talent in Luka, settling on Young for his court vision ?
They can't be so naive to think Young will become any kind of decent defender and won't always be a liability in that area.
As far as the 3's it won't ever be consistent... he still has a low release and needs way to much space
BTW that pick aint looking too good either
They valued multiple future assets. Their 2019 1st-rounder is obviously gonna be a lot better than it would've been with Luka, and if they get someone like Zion or RJ (or pick up even more future assets by trading down again from wherever they end up) with their own pick it very well could be as good or better than the alternative of having just Luka and finishing like 10th in the East this season.