clyde21 wrote:George is being criminally underrated for some reason, he's gonna be what Markelle Fultz was supposed to be, that's his comp
their numbers per36:
Fultz: 23 / 6 / 6 / 1.6 stls
George: 21 / 6 / 4 / 1.3 stls
virtually the same foul/TO rates too
and Fultz was good enough to go #1 in his class.
now Fultz was much better from an efficiency standpoint and u can argue that's the biggest differentiator, but they had almost identical FT rates as well and George is dropping his at >80% while Fultz was at 65% (probably should have been a bigger redflag that it was at the time).
he, imo, other than AB, is the only one that has a strong argument for #3 right now imo,
Fultz playmaking numbers were much better, and he has shown a lot more athletic ability, especially on defense. Fultz college season was just a lot better overall. I buy George as a better shooter but that's about it. He should end up being better than Fultz but that's mostly because Fultz developed the yips and obviously in hindsight Fultz would be nowhere near the top of his draft any longer.
And I think I'm fairly high on George (clearly top 7, and an argument for top 5). But if you want to to make a mostly statistical/boxscore argument for anyone to be drafted #3 it would have to be Brandon Miller who has essentially been a better version Paul George on offense (not on defense) in terms of his statistical profile.