freestyler34 wrote:Darknemo2000 wrote:I know I shouldnt feed the trolls but I will, because you look desperate for attention.
what makes me a troll ? that i dont like the player u were trying to exaggerate and think kanter is better like every1 including nba gms ?
Darknemo2000 wrote:Because Kanters a lot of youth game is based on his strength which he wont have an uperside in NBA against most of the centers. How will he cope with that is not clear.
yes strength is a part of Kanters game but the key reason why he dominates in the paint is bcoz of his great fundamentals and foot work plus when he gets drafted he can hit the gym and gets even more bulked its not like strength wont be a part of his game anymore in the nba, on the other hand players like jonas with long arms its too hard for that kind of players to gain weight for example andrei kirilenko,tayshoun princeDarknemo2000 wrote:Valanciunas clearly lacks talent and thats why he won the MVP of 2008 and 2010. Kanter has 2009 MVP on his belt.
in 2008 u 16 championship jonas MVPed bcoz his team was better and they won the championship otherwise kanter got better numbers than him in that tournament, in 2010 kanter didnt join that tourny he was in the US that timeDarknemo2000 wrote:Training alone is never that good. Playing on a competative level and getting minutes is far much more worthy in rapid quality increase.
hes not training alone,studying and traning in the university of KentucyDarknemo2000 wrote:Numbers speak for them selves: he averages 7.7 points and 5.8 rebounds in only 15 minutes. That means Valanciunas scores 0.51 points (12th result in the league) and grabs 0.36 rebound (second result) per minute while not playing against the College guys but in the second strongest league in the world.
almost %70 of the top 10 prospect in this draft have played against college guys so according to ur argument jonas must be number 1 pick since he played against better players in euro league right ?ur really funny keep on talking u make me laugh
Darknemo2000 wrote:Kanter to that can only offer that he trains hard. Too bad that Valanciunas is relentless in his working ethics (I very much doubt that Kanter shoots 200 FT after every game and training just to improve his FT, which for Valanciunas is already ridiculously 90%+ high anyway.
lol u just repeating urself in every post u made yea we got it he shoot 200 ft every day and got good work ethic anything else ? thought sohes just a simple center with nothing special lets compare him to a random guy in NBA, lets say ibaka
Athletism: ibaka better
Rebounding: ibaka better
Defense: ibaka better
Strength: ibaka better
Post Moves: Same ?
all u can offer about jonas is the so called potential he got thats all nothing concrete
Jonas Valanciunas
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus
Re: Re:
- karolis1221
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 832
- And1: 4
- Joined: Nov 22, 2010
Re: Re:
Re: Re:
-
peZt
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,802
- And1: 1,961
- Joined: Aug 15, 2010
- Location: Braunschweig
-
Re: Re:
Darknemo2000 wrote:
Valanciunas clearly lacks talent and thats why he won the MVP of 2008 and 2010. Kanter has 2009 MVP on his belt.
Obviously the guy with no talent always gets one MVP tittle more over the so much talent filled guy. I mean its usual, right?
eh, you know that Kanter didnt play in 2010 do you? I wouldn't be so sure if Valanciunas would have won the award in 2010 if Kanter played as well. Because Valanciunas played for a lithuanian team with a lot of talented and good players. But Kanter would have been definitely more valuable for turkey than Jonas was for Lithuania. And I'm sure that Kanter would have had better stats in 2010 than Valanciunas.
One of the reason why Kanter got so many rebs is because in Turkey he is the only good rebounder, in Lithaunian team there are a lot of good rebounder so rebound stats never get focused on one player (usually reb statistic of 2009 is very spread out).
Thats just not true. Do you know Furkan Aldemir? He's one of the best rebounders in the turkish league with 19 years already and he was on that team. So Kanter had one of the best rebounders of Europe in that agegroup on his team. That just shows what a tremendous rebounder Enes Kanter is.
In the smi's however Kanter really did dominate Valanciunas.
Kanter had an amazing tournament but Valanciunas was there too. Except for that one bad game with Turkey in Semi's he playd well an consistant (was the second in the 2009 by points while Kanter was third, again its only because his lack of talent why Valanciunas took the second place obviously).
Kanter was first in rebounds while Valanciunas was fourth.
Clearly Valanciunas lacks talent so thats why even in there he ended up being second in efficiency.
Kanter was only third in scoring because he had a couple of games in the group stage against low calibre opponents where he didnt play that much. Otherwise he would have been the clear leader in scoring, thats out of question. And his rebounding numbers would have been just incredible.
From the quarterfinals on in 4 games his averages were nearly 28 Points and 19 Rebounds.
Kanter is more individual player, likes focus on himself, Valanciunas is more of the team player - never gets angry or frustrated for not getting touches.
Kanter dominated every team and player he has faced in his career. So i don't really see the problem with his individual play. It doesn't mean that he's a bad team player. And the second part applies to Kanter too. He has great intangibles and never complains to his teammates or the refs.
Kanter sometimes slack off on defensive end, never happens with Valanciunas who keeps his motor running on both ends of the floor.
Ok I agree with you here. Kanter isn't really a good defender. I hope he will get a better defender in time.
But don't understand me wrong. I really like Valanciunas as a player. I think he can become a great player in the NBA but to me Kanter is the better player. He can do things that Valanciunas probably wont ever be able to do. But at the same time Valanciunas will always be the better athlete and defender. But all in all in my opinion Kanter is and will be better.
But everytime I read this thread i get the impression that some people are desperately trying to make Valanciunas look better than Kanter and make Kanter bad.
Re: Re:
-
Darknemo2000
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,609
- And1: 1,685
- Joined: Dec 25, 2010
-
Re: Re:
what makes me a troll ? that i dont like the player u were trying to exaggerate and think kanter is better like every1 including nba gms ?![]()
Saying that Valanciunas lacks the talent and can only hope to reach 'Hakeem' Kanter level seems like trolling to me.
yes strength is a part of Kanters game but the key reason why he dominates in the paint is bcoz of his great fundamentals and foot work plus when he gets drafted he can hit the gym and gets even more bulked its not like strength wont be a part of his game anymore in the nba, on the other hand players like jonas with long arms its too hard for that kind of players to gain weight for example andrei kirilenko,tayshoun prince
I agree that for the long wingspan players it is harder to gain weight, but it is also clear that on the youth level the players who mater faster than the others have tremendious advantage and can pull great stats. Good example Karnowski - who had a great stats because of his mass but when he needed to step up on the level where the mass equals around as in grown up had serious struggles.
in 2008 u 16 championship jonas MVPed bcoz his team was better and they won the championship otherwise kanter got better numbers than him in that tournament, in 2010 kanter didnt join that tourny he was in the US that time
eh, you know that Kanter didnt play in 2010 do you? I wouldn't be so sure if Valanciunas would have won the award in 2010 if Kanter played as well. Because Valanciunas played for a lithuanian team with a lot of talented and good players. But Kanter would have been definitely more valuable for turkey than Jonas was for Lithuania. And I'm sure that Kanter would have had better stats in 2010 than Valanciunas.
Having better stats on weak team is always easier than having good stats on the strong one.
Kanter would have not won 2010 MVP for the same reason he didnt win it in 2008. Your stats can be better than others but its the players who are leaders on the strong, contending teams that get the MVP. Unless those teams do not have sticking out players and yet Lithuania does.
Lithuania would have torn turkey apart considering how they were playing all tournament long and that it was one their home soil.
They played their worst game against serbia for 36 or so minutes and started playing their game only when the time was running out and still grabbed a win, erasing the double digit point difference with ease.
hes not training alone,studying and traning in the university of Kentucy
I know he is not training alone, yet it still doenst stimulate the level of the Euroleague games by far.
almost %70 of the top 10 prospect in this draft have played against college guys so according to ur argument jonas must be number 1 pick since he played against better players in euro league right ?ur really funny keep on talking u make me laugh
It doenst make him a number one pick but it makes him a quite stable and known pick as compared to the guy who last played competitive basketball in two years, dominated the all-star game between same year olds and has only good performances on the youth level two years ago to boast about.
l
ol u just repeating urself in every post u made yea we got it he shoot 200 ft every day and got good work ethic anything else ? thought sohes just a simple center with nothing special lets compare him to a random guy in NBA, lets say ibaka
Athletism: ibaka better
Rebounding: ibaka better
Defense: ibaka better
Strength: ibaka better
Post Moves: Same ?
If you would compare Kanter to the same random ibaka you would find that Ibaka is also better in each of those aspects with an exception of postal moves.
Kanter was only third in scoring because he had a couple of games in the group stage against low calibre opponents where he didnt play that much. Otherwise he would have been the clear leader in scoring, thats out of question. And his rebounding numbers would have been just incredible.
From the quarterfinals on in 4 games his averages were nearly 28 Points and 19 Rebounds.
If you look at minutes Valanciunas played even less average minutes than Kanter did (same reason as you mentioned - games against low level opponents thus no need to keep leaders).
Kanter dominated every team and player he has faced in his career. So i don't really see the problem with his individual play. It doesn't mean that he's a bad team player. And the second part applies to Kanter too. He has great intangibles and never complains to his teammates or the refs.
Its not a bad thing to be an individual dominant player but you need to have a team built around you in such case. Valanciunas is more fitting in that sense because he doenst dominate the ball and is perfectly fine with just rebounding and securing the defense.
Different types of players really and doesnt mean that one is better than the other. If you want to get a dominant player around whom you want to build a team Knater is actually better (or at least was, I am still sceptical about him until I see him play on the high level again), but players like Valanciunas also doesn't come easy - great player who can dominant if he is asked to but can blend with the team, making it better as a unit.
But don't understand me wrong. I really like Valanciunas as a player. I think he can become a great player in the NBAbut to me Kanter is the better player. He can do things that Valanciunas probably wont ever be able to do. But at the same time Valanciunas will always be the better athlete and defender. But all in all in my opinion Kanter is and will be better.
But everytime I read this thread i get the impression that some people are desperately trying to make Valanciunas look better than Kanter and make Kanter bad.
No I think Kanter will be a greta talent however, his current level still remains in question, because neither you nor I had the chance to see him on the high level games apart from the all-star hoops which though reveals talents like Nowitzki also can make players like Macvan shine, thus keeping it as a not so very secure evaluation tool.
It is closer to NBA game athleticism but the general level is still lower than that of Euroleague.
Re: Re:
- LithuanianOne
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 895
- And1: 31
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Re: Re:
freestyler34 wrote:
irrelavent wall of text.Darknemo2000 wrote:Kanter to that can only offer that he trains hard. Too bad that Valanciunas is relentless in his working ethics (I very much doubt that Kanter shoots 200 FT after every game and training just to improve his FT, which for Valanciunas is already ridiculously 90%+ high anyway.
lol u just repeating urself in every post u made yea we got it he shoot 200 ft every day and got good work ethic anything else ? thought sohes just a simple center with nothing special lets compare him to a random guy in NBA, lets say ibaka
Athletism: ibaka better
Rebounding: ibaka better
Defense: ibaka better
Strength: ibaka better
Post Moves: Same ?
all u can offer about jonas is the so called potential he got thats all nothing concrete
Now this is just not true. He's is not a simple center - he already has athletic tools to be a good starting nba center (length, wingspan, height) he only lacks some extra bulk and muscle which he should be able to add easily ( remember he's only 18 years old). He is already good on defensive end- if he does become bigger the dude will be a legit NBA defender. He already showed some mid - range game + his FT% lets us expect that he develops a mid - range jumper.
Kanter at the moment is a better player and probably will be better for a few years to come. But Valanciunas definitely has the potential to surpass him and saying he's not special is almost a blasphemy
knicksfan5494 wrote:ANd by NO means are Monroe and Cousins better than Fields. Wall probably, though.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
Kirsten19
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,799
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 08, 2009
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Valanciunas is fairly athletic in Europe but his athleticism can't be compared to these athletic bigs in NBA, I don't think he can be described as athletic by NBA standard.
He certainly need to gain weight n muscle since he's lanky, but I think athleticism is something that he cannot improve.
He certainly need to gain weight n muscle since he's lanky, but I think athleticism is something that he cannot improve.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
Darknemo2000
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,609
- And1: 1,685
- Joined: Dec 25, 2010
-
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Kirsten19 wrote:Valanciunas is fairly athletic in Europe but his athleticism can't be compared to these athletic bigs in NBA, I don't think he can be described as athletic by NBA standard.
He certainly need to gain weight n muscle since he's lanky, but I think athleticism is something that he cannot improve.
That I agree with. You cannot really improve your athleticism but on the other hand his wingspan is enough to cope with more athletic guys and even have the advantage (his unnaturally long hands help him there where just vertical fails for example).
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
He can most definitely improve his strength which is part of athleticism. Combination of length, quickness and hopefully strength should be sufficient IMO
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
sisibilio
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,316
- And1: 1,435
- Joined: Nov 18, 2009
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Kirsten19 wrote:Valanciunas is fairly athletic in Europe but his athleticism can't be compared to these athletic bigs in NBA, I don't think he can be described as athletic by NBA standard.
He certainly need to gain weight n muscle since he's lanky, but I think athleticism is something that he cannot improve.
What do you mean by athleticism? Agility, speed, coordination? He ranks above average by NBA standars in any of those categories, he might not jump as high as Dwight or Javale Mcgee but he's far from flat footed and he's also very quick jumper.
The only thing he lacks is sheer strength, but he's got a very good frame, i'm sure he won't have any problem gaining 10-15 pounds of muscle within the next few years.
If you want to try to measure the elements of basketball that are supposedly unmeasurable, spend a game just watching Marc Gasol.
@MikePradaSBN
Wembanyama was created to end all LeBron vs Jordan debates
@MikePradaSBN
Wembanyama was created to end all LeBron vs Jordan debates
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
Kirsten19
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,799
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 08, 2009
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Even Chad Ford Describe Valanciunas as "lacks strength and elite athleticism"
I think he knows Valanciunas better than we do. Coz we don't see his games very often
http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2011/mockdraft
I think he knows Valanciunas better than we do. Coz we don't see his games very often
http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2011/mockdraft
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
sisibilio
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,316
- And1: 1,435
- Joined: Nov 18, 2009
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Kirsten19 wrote:Even Chad Ford Describe Valanciunas as "lacks strength and elite athleticism"
I think he knows Valanciunas better than we do. Coz we don't see his games very often
http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2011/mockdraft
You might not see his games very often, i'd bet i watched a lot more of his games than mr Ford, almost every game Lietuvos plays is available in streaming and/or torrent sites, and all the games Lithuania played in the u18 european championship last summer were also broadcasted.
It's the 21st century, you can follow the carreer of any player almost week after week if you're interested.
Besides, i'll tell you a secret, Chad Ford is not a very good analist.
If you want to try to measure the elements of basketball that are supposedly unmeasurable, spend a game just watching Marc Gasol.
@MikePradaSBN
Wembanyama was created to end all LeBron vs Jordan debates
@MikePradaSBN
Wembanyama was created to end all LeBron vs Jordan debates
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
TB
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,573
- And1: 1,413
- Joined: Mar 11, 2007
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
The strength thing needs to be put into perspective. The kid is young, of course he isn't as strong as the pro's he's going up against. The question should be regarding his frame and work ethic. I personally think he will be able to put on the amount of weight necessary to compete at a very high level. It's just going to take a few years.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
Darknemo2000
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,609
- And1: 1,685
- Joined: Dec 25, 2010
-
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Kirsten19 wrote:Even Chad Ford Describe Valanciunas as "lacks strength and elite athleticism"
I think he knows Valanciunas better than we do. Coz we don't see his games very often
http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2011/mockdraft
I very doubt that Ford has seen more games than a number of people posting on this thread. You can question the bias towards Jonas and thats why my or others judgement is clouded but you really shouldnt argue that we have seen less games of him.
These are the times of internet and Lietuvos Rytas is a popular team in Lithuania so most of it games are available in streaming. You can easily follow Valanciunas career on the net if you want to and I doubt that Ford watched even half of the games of that, not to mention that he isnt the most reliable specialist to begin with.
I do think however that Valanciunas lacks strength but its bit cloudy on what do you think athleticism is?
If just strength and ability to lift off Valanciunas isnt great in that, on the other hand for his size he is very agile, speed is ok too (he runs funny though) as he gets to fast breaks together with guards of Rytas a lot, so its something, he has good reflexes (or are reflexes and hands not part of athleticism? - I am curious because the more we discuss the more I am getting confused of what athleticism consist off).
Him not jumping high is not a problem at all since he is not flat footed - he still lifts off the ground and what he lacks in jump his wingspan turns into his advantage.
But there was a good note made - Prince and Kirilenko also had bigger wingspan than they should considering their size, but they do not gain much power and weight on their frame. What makes Valanciunas bit more hopeful is that he is able to put more power on his frame - now I havent seen Prince at this age but I have seen Kirilenko and Kirilenko wasnt nearly as fast gaining it. Yet the point is that it is considerably harder to get weight and strength with this frame, on the other hand such frame usually gives you the best tools to be a really good defender.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
Point-God
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,114
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jun 01, 2010
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Jonas Valanciunas is clearly a good enough athlete for the NBA game for his height and position. Who cares about his strength? He's a damn 18 year old!!! Give him 3-5 years of development with NBA trainers and he'll be built comparable to guys like Rasho Nesterovic, Darko Milicic, and Pau Gasol. What Euro big has ever had problems strengthening in the NBA? I don't think Jonas Valanciunas will have any issues getting his body right for the NBA games in due time. I only question Jonas talent. I've watched his games and he never appeared to me to be worthy of a top 5 lottery pick. In fact, if someone told me that he was projected to go in the 2nd round I would believe them and say "he looks like he has a good chance of sticking in the NBA." That's far from him being considered a top lottery pick at the moment.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
- karolis1221
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 832
- And1: 4
- Joined: Nov 22, 2010
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Kirsten19 wrote:Even Chad Ford Describe Valanciunas as "lacks strength and elite athleticism"
I think he knows Valanciunas better than we do. Coz we don't see his games very often
http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2011/mockdraft
i dont think so
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
- brassviews
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,532
- And1: 132
- Joined: Dec 26, 2008
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
I believe Ford gets his info from Givony from DX. Meaning, he doesn't actually watch games.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
Kirsten19
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,799
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 08, 2009
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
So you all think he's an elite athlete? I've seen some of his games, he wasn't that athletic if u ask me.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
Point-God
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,114
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jun 01, 2010
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Kirsten19 wrote:So you all think he's an elite athlete? I've seen some of his games, he wasn't that athletic if u ask me.
So is there only elite or bad athlete with nothing between? His athleticism is comparable to guys that had long NBA careers like Nick Collison and Raef Lafrentz.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,926
- And1: 16,428
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Point-God wrote:Kirsten19 wrote:So you all think he's an elite athlete? I've seen some of his games, he wasn't that athletic if u ask me.
So is there only elite or bad athlete with nothing between? His athleticism is comparable to guys that had long NBA careers like Nick Collison and Raef Lafrentz.
Nobody's saying Valanciunas won't have a long NBA career. But you don't want to get a Nenad Krstic with the #2-#5 pick
Liberate The Zoomers
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
- brassviews
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,532
- And1: 132
- Joined: Dec 26, 2008
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Dr Mufasa wrote:Point-God wrote:Kirsten19 wrote:So you all think he's an elite athlete? I've seen some of his games, he wasn't that athletic if u ask me.
So is there only elite or bad athlete with nothing between? His athleticism is comparable to guys that had long NBA careers like Nick Collison and Raef Lafrentz.
Nobody's saying Valanciunas won't have a long NBA career. But you don't want to get a Nenad Krstic with the #2-#5 pick
Before the injuries, Krstic was a pretty good player. I wouldn't say he's the best example for your argument.
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
-
Point-God
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,114
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jun 01, 2010
Re: Jonas Valanciunas
Dr Mufasa wrote: But you don't want to get a Nenad Krstic with the #2-#5 pick
Well I'm on board with that. I haven't seen anything that would suggest that he can be a much better player than that when he develops. But Nenad Krstic was once very promising. If Jonas Valanciunas can be the 2006 Nenad he would be worth it in this weak draft.




