Brandon Jennings 2008-09 European Season Stats

EddieJonesFan · Post #161 » by **EddieJonesFan** » Mon Jun 8, 2009 6:39 pm

So...uh...do you guys think Jennings made a mistake by not playing in the reebok eurocamp?

Post #162 » by **Alfred** » Mon Jun 8, 2009 8:07 pm

KWSN-Men wrote:
Alyosha12 wrote:Just to make it clear guys, KWSN-Man is really VS-666 from interbasket forum or after he was banned he came back with Basketball player. KWSN-Man is another poster on interbasket but he gives basketball player a really hard time because as you all have seen he likes to make stuff up and never backs it up with a link and yet he claims it is fact. So Basketball player hates KWSN-Man really bad and wants to make him look bad i would think thats why he is parading around here posting such ludicrous stuff under his name, also KWSN-Man is a panathinaikos fan and would never sport an Oly avatar.

And you have the audacity to accuse others of "making things up"?

Were you on the talkbasket forum?

Rasho Brezec · Post #163 » by **Rasho Brezec** » Mon Jun 8, 2009 11:39 pm

EddieJonesFan wrote:So...uh...do you guys think Jennings made a mistake by not playing in the reebok eurocamp?

Stop derailing this thread.

Hendrix · Post #164 » by **Hendrix** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:32 am

Am I the only 1 that tried an online IQ test after reading this hilarious thread?

Anyways KWSN-Men you no longer have the highest fictitious IQ in this thread. 198 bitches.

AQuintus · Post #165 » by **AQuintus** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:28 am

Hendrix wrote:Am I the only 1 that tried an online IQ test after reading this hilarious thread?

Anyways KWSN-Men you no longer have the highest fictitious IQ in this thread. 198 bitches.

Is it safe to assume that you'll be meeting with the president any day now?

Hendrix · Post #166 » by **Hendrix** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:41 am

AQuintus wrote:Is it safe to assume that you'll be meeting with the president any day now?

I was suppose to but canceled it. Too busy dealing with stealth technology and posting on realgm for that.

old rem · Post #167 » by **old rem** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:08 am

KWSN-Men wrote:
miltk wrote:
KWSN-Men wrote:It's quite interesting that the NBA so highly covets such a performance.

They look at tools not numbers. I'm not in Jennings' corner, but if I'm going to defend Jrue then I have to apply the same logic to BJ.

And maybe this explains why so many NBA draft picks don't pan out. Jennings' season ended today and I went to look up his numbers to post a subject about it to discuss it here. I knew he was struggling, but I had no idea it was that bad. He really had a terrible, terrible year.

No kidding. There has to be MAJOR concerns and while observers and fans may feed off each other' speculations...the actual teams are looking at tape of those games and I can't figure what the hell they see that makes those weak numbers look okay. If a guy had those numbers in an NBA season...it probably would be his last.

Holiday is supposedly also getting a free pass.....sucked all year? No problem.

old rem · Post #168 » by **old rem** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:16 am

EddieJonesFan wrote:So...uh...do you guys think Jennings made a mistake by not playing in the reebok eurocamp?

If he is good he has to SHOW not HIDE. The guy is ducking and looking to get by of the sham.

old rem · Post #169 » by **old rem** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:23 am

The Stealth technology on the F117 and the B-2 had nothing to do with " Rocket Scientists" as its more a blending of materials technology, specifically Carbon-Carbon composites and Wave Deflection Theory,a concept of Physics that was known back when I was in high school. A Russian did some important math that did help inspire Lockheed's original Have Blue project. However much of Stealth came out of the Skunk Works reverse engineering the concept of radar

Secretaries obviously are not the profession with the highest IQ when it takes an exceptionally high IQ to get into Med school..as one easy example.

NormanDale · Post #170 » by **NormanDale** » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:18 pm

KWSN-Men wrote:
Promezclan wrote:Under the more lenient Stanford-Binet distribution (standard deviation = 16), about 1 out of 1.013 billion people have an IQ of higher than 196.

That means there are about 6 people in the world with an IQ of 197 or greater. We now know that, remarkably, three of them come from the same family.

Both me and my mother met the President in person after we were tested.

Why would you want to meet the president when you could learn so much more by meeting his secretary?

This is the greatest thread ever.

Star-Lord · Post #171 » by **Star-Lord** » Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:46 pm

old rem wrote:The Stealth technology on the F117 and the B-2 had nothing to do with " Rocket Scientists" as its more a blending of materials technology, specifically Carbon-Carbon composites and Wave Deflection Theory,a concept of Physics that was known back when I was in high school. A Russian did some important math that did help inspire Lockheed's original Have Blue project. However much of Stealth came out of the Skunk Works reverse engineering the concept of radar

Secretaries obviously are not the profession with the highest IQ when it takes an exceptionally high IQ to get into Med school..as one easy example.

I didn't realize that stealth was a medieval technology.

vincecarter4pres · Post #172 » by **vincecarter4pres** » Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:13 pm

Brandon Jennings seems to have a solid grasp on stealth technology.

BubbaTee · Post #173 » by **BubbaTee** » Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:59 pm

CCIIIs Hair wrote:It is. He could have said, "After we were tested, the president wanted to meet my mom and me."

The sentence he posted should have read: "My mother and I met the president in person after we were tested."

Shouldn't "president" be capitalized?

Anyways, there needs to be a RealGM HOF, just to induct this thread.

Twinkie defense · Post #174 » by **Twinkie defense** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:00 am

Wow what a crazy thread.

First, let me say that IQ is pretty much BS.

But there is a genetic, as well as cultural component to this arbitrary measure, so the odds of "geniuses" being related is, I would imagine, higher than among the general populace.

Also, I don't think it would be a stretch that very intelligent people might want to hang out together, get married and have kids.

The thing I wonder about Jennings is his B-BALL iq... what do you think I haven't watched him a lot.

Twinkie defense · Post #175 » by **Twinkie defense** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:10 am

gswhoopsman wrote:
CCIIIs Hair wrote:It is.

No it isn't.

One cannot win a grammar war with Adonal Foyle...

Coxy · Post #176 » by **Coxy** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:13 am

I have an IQ of Coco Pops.

Coxy · Post #177 » by **Coxy** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:17 am

Ummmmmmm, worst thread everrrrrrrr...............

Twinkie defense · Post #178 » by **Twinkie defense** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:17 am

My cat's breath smells like cat food.

Coxy · Post #179 » by **Coxy** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:30 am

Twinkie defense wrote:My cat's breath smells like cat food.

Kyrama · Post #180 » by **Kyrama** » Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:15 am

I think the moral of this thread is that five-question Facebook IQ tests are not accurate.