SportsGuy8 wrote:Yes, I agree with all of this, but I still think you're a bit too harsh on him. Quite often his role at Barca was to simply go stay in the corner and do his work on the defensive end. He rarely saw the chance to do his thing as a PG.
But wasn't that because Barca had guys like Navarro, Lorbek, and Mickeal that the offense was based in, simply because they were so much better on offense overall than Rubio was? The point being, USA sports media, and even NBA general managers claimed Rubio was not only the best player in Europe, they even claimed he was the best EuroLeague player of all times...
So, it's not fair for someone to use Rubio as a comparison to Doncic here, based on "hype prior to NBA". Simply because the hype in USA surrounding Rubio was obviously fake and imaginary - he was touted as being a player that was some levels beyond what he actually was.
Doncic's hype seems to be more in the level of, "one of the best players in Europe", and "perhaps the best player ever in EuroLeague at his age" - basically, Doncic's hype seems to be far more accurate to what he actually is, versus the hype Rubio had, which was totally exaggerated.
Rubio was never going to live up to the ridiculous over the top hype, which was not based in facts, but Doncic's hype is much closer to how he's actually performing as a player. In other words, no reason to talk about Rubio and Doncic, as far as how Rubio did not live up to his hype, so somehow that means Doncic is to be written off also.





















