Luka Doncic part II

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#181 » by pacersGM » Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:49 pm

J_T wrote:
Here is a question, I hope you don't think it's unfair. All these Euroleague players that Doncic is supposedly not able to beat 1 on 1... what do you think an actual score would have been if they played a first to 11 game? Do you think that Doncic would actually be losing more often than not?


what the .... did i just read? tell me, are you serious with this?
and for guys to have the nerves to come at be after posting a draftexpress made video showing his inability to create in iso? really ? :)

thats your thought process on this, really? nice :)
J_T
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1,844
Joined: May 07, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#182 » by J_T » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:00 pm

Ettorefm wrote:You watch games, you know what I'm talking about. There are stats showing the number of drives to the rim per game. Not only are those very small for a guy as good as him, but his efficiency on DRIVING SHOTS is abysmal.

I am genuinely interested in seeing these stats. Where can I look them up? I'm not saying you are wrong, but I really haven't seen this anywhere.

63.2% includes offensive rebounds, fastbreak opportunities, open shots...they skew reality.

That's true but they also include contested jumpers that are not drives. I'm sure you will agree that FG% is lower for those.

How many open layups does lebron have every game? Or Harden? every drive is contested by one or two guys, a weakside defender trying to get the block, and sometimes he even gets fouled to add up.

I don't get a feeling that Doncic is having it easy. It looks to me like he is being contested. Are you simply saying that he is not as contested because the quality of "contest attempt" is going to be higher in NBA because of better players? I think that's kind of a circular argument and in that case you have presented it in a way where it's not possible to disprove your point even in theory. What I would reply in that case is that you can't prove your hypothesis either, because he is not playing in NBA right now.

My point is, what happens when bigger, longer and stronger defenders null Doncic's shot by giving him contested mid-range jumpers or open drives at the rim where a 7'2 DPOY is waiting there? Because that's what they'll do, nobody's stupid to let Doncic, an elite off the dribble shooter from 3 just pull up like it's nothing.

I get your point, I disagree on the (implied) answer to your own question, though. I guess we will have to wait and see. :)
Ettorefm
Head Coach
Posts: 7,391
And1: 5,260
Joined: Aug 08, 2011
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
 

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#183 » by Ettorefm » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:12 pm

I am genuinely interested in seeing these stats. Where can I look them up? I'm not saying you are wrong, but I really haven't seen this anywhere.


Give me a few minutes, I'll post it

That's true but they also include contested jumpers that are not drives. I'm sure you will agree that FG% is lower for those.


Agreed

I don't get a feeling that Doncic is having it easy. It looks to me like he is being contested. Are you simply saying that he is not as contested because the quality of "contest attempt" is going to be higher in NBA because of better players?


No, that's not it. what I'm saying is that he only takes shots (close one, driving ones, 0-3 ones) he can easily make, which is fine and smart, but the point is - what kind of shots are those?

It's like saying DeAndre jordan has a 70% FG and 85% on dunk attempts - that's awesome, but 1)Low attempts and 2)He only takes those easy shots; if they're remotely contested, he passes the ball, so just as it shows he's VERY SMART and efficient, it also shows he's limited in many ways.

Watch the last three Real Madrid games and see how many close-range shots are contested. If you only attempt shots when you're open or 2 on 1 fast break situations, or grabbing an offensive rebound and simply laying it in, that's GREAT, but Doncic is not a role player - he's a SUPERSTAR project. He'll be asked to do a lot more than that.

See Lonzo Ball. He's just like that. His numbers are awful right now but getting better each month, so I'll just take his game from UCLA. He had a very efficient driving game, but at the same time all prospects had a consensus he was a very bad slasher, finisher and not that good on half-court sets. Why is that?

Because if you look at the VIDEO, and not stats, 90% of his shots were easy shots. If he had a tough finish to do, he'd pass instead. If the right side was kinda open but a C was coming to contest it, he'd pass the ball. He had TONS AND TONS of FG made by simply grabbing rebounds and scoring, or fast break opportunities 3 on 1, 2 on 1. His efficiency on those shots are practically 100% - no pro player can miss open layups or putbacks.

Understand my point?

I think I'll compile every single driving shot from Doncic in the last months. I think it'll add to the discussion. Even in the last few games, where he had ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE passes off drive and kick situations, I just imagine what he would do if defenses took the open 3 pointer off, would he suddenly score every time because that 's what the defense is giving him? Or would he deny the open lane and try a stepback or a long 2?

TL;DR - He's not having it easy; he's being contested. The thing is, when he's contested, he doesn't take the shot. He only tries layups he can easily make, which is
1) Good for the team
2) Extremely smart
3) A red flag, because it shows a gap in his scoring capabilities.
bagsboy wrote:For two hundred years Democrats stole the productive output of slaves and now they seek to enrich themselves with the productive output from the 'rich'. First, Republicans needed to end slavery and next they need to fix taxation with a flat fair tax.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,536
And1: 9,962
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#184 » by The-Power » Mon Dec 18, 2017 3:56 pm

Ettorefm wrote:TL;DR - He's not having it easy; he's being contested. The thing is, when he's contested, he doesn't take the shot. He only tries layups he can easily make, which is
1) Good for the team
2) Extremely smart
3) A red flag, because it shows a gap in his scoring capabilities.

It's only a red flag if a) you believe he can't considerably improve on his finishing through contests and/or b) if you want him to be one of the best scorers in the league. I would argue that the first will improve – the question is just by how much – and that the second isn't a necessity for Doncic to be one of the best players in the league.

And another question I'd like to pose here since we're playing the ‘imagine him in the NBA‘ game: which top prospect would not struggle to score reliably, efficiently and at a high volume in non-PnR situations if being tightly guarded by some of the best defenders in the NBA? There is not a single player in college basketball who would not have this supposed red flag at the moment.
Ettorefm
Head Coach
Posts: 7,391
And1: 5,260
Joined: Aug 08, 2011
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
 

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#185 » by Ettorefm » Mon Dec 18, 2017 3:59 pm

The-Power wrote:
Ettorefm wrote:TL;DR - He's not having it easy; he's being contested. The thing is, when he's contested, he doesn't take the shot. He only tries layups he can easily make, which is
1) Good for the team
2) Extremely smart
3) A red flag, because it shows a gap in his scoring capabilities.

It's only a red flag if a) you believe he can't considerably improve on his finishing through contests and/or b) if you want him to be one of the best scorers in the league. I would argue that the first will improve – the question is just by how much – and that the second isn't a necessity for Doncic to be one of the best players in the league.

And another question I'd like to pose here since we're playing the ‘imagine him in the NBA‘ game: which top prospect would not struggle to score reliably, efficiently and at a high volume in non-PnR situations if being tightly guarded by some of the best defenders in the NBA? There is not a single player in college basketball who would not have this supposed red flag at the moment.


Finishing through contests it's not just balance, strength or practice, it's based on your athletic ability also. But specially, it's about play style and willingness.

I recently watched his full highlights against Olimpiacos in which he had a great game, but it 's amazing how he had over 10 opportunities for layups and settled for stepback jumpers or equivocally passed the ball. It's extremely frustrating, the lane was wide open and he didn't take the opportunities.

It's a mental thing for him (not saying he has a block or anything), he's not that kind of guy. He's doesn't have the drive to...well, drive. He prefers to pump fake or take fadeaways instead of going through the opponent's body, sometimes guys way weaker than him.
bagsboy wrote:For two hundred years Democrats stole the productive output of slaves and now they seek to enrich themselves with the productive output from the 'rich'. First, Republicans needed to end slavery and next they need to fix taxation with a flat fair tax.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,536
And1: 9,962
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#186 » by The-Power » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:01 pm

Ettorefm wrote:
The-Power wrote:
Ettorefm wrote:TL;DR - He's not having it easy; he's being contested. The thing is, when he's contested, he doesn't take the shot. He only tries layups he can easily make, which is
1) Good for the team
2) Extremely smart
3) A red flag, because it shows a gap in his scoring capabilities.

It's only a red flag if a) you believe he can't considerably improve on his finishing through contests and/or b) if you want him to be one of the best scorers in the league. I would argue that the first will improve – the question is just by how much – and that the second isn't a necessity for Doncic to be one of the best players in the league.

And another question I'd like to pose here since we're playing the ‘imagine him in the NBA‘ game: which top prospect would not struggle to score reliably, efficiently and at a high volume in non-PnR situations if being tightly guarded by some of the best defenders in the NBA? There is not a single player in college basketball who would not have this supposed red flag at the moment.


Finishing through contests it's not just balance, strength or practice, it's based on your athletic ability also. But specially, it's about play style.

I recently watched his full highlights against Panathinaikos in which he had a great game, but it 's amazing how he had over 10 opportunities for layups and settled for stepback jumpers or equivocally passed the ball. It's extremely frustrating, the lane was wide open.

And you say he cannot develop a more drive-oriented game after entering the league at 18 years old if his coaches want him to? Limited athletic ability or not, if you say the lanes were wide open but he didn't take it then this is entirely fixable.
Ettorefm
Head Coach
Posts: 7,391
And1: 5,260
Joined: Aug 08, 2011
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
 

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#187 » by Ettorefm » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:11 pm

The-Power wrote:
Ettorefm wrote:
The-Power wrote:It's only a red flag if a) you believe he can't considerably improve on his finishing through contests and/or b) if you want him to be one of the best scorers in the league. I would argue that the first will improve – the question is just by how much – and that the second isn't a necessity for Doncic to be one of the best players in the league.

And another question I'd like to pose here since we're playing the ‘imagine him in the NBA‘ game: which top prospect would not struggle to score reliably, efficiently and at a high volume in non-PnR situations if being tightly guarded by some of the best defenders in the NBA? There is not a single player in college basketball who would not have this supposed red flag at the moment.


Finishing through contests it's not just balance, strength or practice, it's based on your athletic ability also. But specially, it's about play style.

I recently watched his full highlights against Panathinaikos in which he had a great game, but it 's amazing how he had over 10 opportunities for layups and settled for stepback jumpers or equivocally passed the ball. It's extremely frustrating, the lane was wide open.

And you say he cannot develop a more drive-oriented game after entering the league at 18 years old if his coaches want him to? Limited athletic ability or not, if you say the lanes were wide open but he didn't take it then this is entirely fixable.


Well, then why are we even discussion this? If everything is fixable and probably will improve on every prospect, then fine...

I'm evaluating the prospect based on his strengths, weaknesses and specially style of play and how his game translates to the NBA, and a playmaker who can create for others, can rebound the ball and shoot from anywhere is exactly what's needed in 2017, but I don't believe his 1 on 1 game will ever be what's expected of him (i.e clutch moments).

I mean, Curry gets criticized because he doesn't make teams pay as much as he should when they give him the lane and take his shot out, imagine a guy like Doncic who's tall as hell and teams can simply switch and not feel the difference in strength/height. Without the pick n roll, Doncic is just a pull up jumpshooter from 3.

Imagine him playing against the Cavs. Crowder is on him, and they call a pick (Let's say the C is Robin Lopez, he might go to the bulls). Tristan thompson/Love can EASILY matchup against him, and as they're tall and stronger than him, he'd have to blow by them, which is what every other pick n roll ball handler does. But we all know Doncic is not that fast, quick or has a great first step. ALl the space you get by setting a pick for an elite pick'n'roll player like Doncic is negated by simply switching. He can't abuse guys without his shooting.

The only answer would be for the smallest guy in the court to set a pick for him, and that dynamic is completely different from what Doncic is used to. It takes away the Pop, the Roll, it's just a forced switch.

Take a look at all point-forwards or simply great SF's who run the pick n roll. They all have something common - the ability to get past anyone in this league. Giannis, Lebron, Durant, Paul george is a great pick'n'roll player, Simmons, . Is there any other SF with a PG-like game at 6'8/6'9 whose speed and quickness is below average?

Maybe turkoglu? I can't think of anyone else. If he were 6'3, he'd be steve Nash. He could get tips from him on how to use his balance, ball handling and learn the shortcuts to be a great finisher and driver withotu being an elite athlete. Also, there aren't that many amazing PG defenders, and PG defense is not that relevant anyway (picks take that away, different from a 6'9 guy running the pick n roll and not being able to destroy the C with his speed).

SFs are the most athletic and best defensive position in the league.
bagsboy wrote:For two hundred years Democrats stole the productive output of slaves and now they seek to enrich themselves with the productive output from the 'rich'. First, Republicans needed to end slavery and next they need to fix taxation with a flat fair tax.
thr3ep01nte4
Junior
Posts: 346
And1: 150
Joined: Oct 31, 2015

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#188 » by thr3ep01nte4 » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:17 pm

Clearly there will always be detractors till he proves it he can do it. Just like they used to say Dirk was soft and couldn’t win with him , then 2011 shut them up.

NBA draft (at the top) always leans towards physical dominant and offensively talented players. GMs, for their jobs sake, will often prefer college players. So at this point, it’s quite clear Doncic will not be no.1. (Bagley and Ayton pretty much have that covered. He will probably be no.3 coming draft time.) But that doesn’t mean he cannot be the best player afterwards. You have to be in the best situation to develop. Say if the Hawks get the no.3 pick and he can work with Bud, then he could end up being better than both those guys in the long run.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,536
And1: 9,962
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#189 » by The-Power » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:49 pm

Ettorefm wrote:
The-Power wrote:And you say he cannot develop a more drive-oriented game after entering the league at 18 years old if his coaches want him to? Limited athletic ability or not, if you say the lanes were wide open but he didn't take it then this is entirely fixable.


Well, then why are we even discussion this? If everything is fixable and probably will improve on every prospect, then fine...

I'm all for discussing strengths and weaknesses, discussing the likeliness of overcoming deficiencies, the translation of skill- and mind-sets as well as how much weaknesses and strengths are going to matter in the NBA.

Having said that, it's not about discussing the issues but the certainty some argue with that he can't develop in those areas. I'm not addressing specifically you here because you provide quality insights. But in this thread you sometimes get the impression that Doncic is who he is, which is absolutely crazy for any 18 year old player.

My ‘this is entirely fixable‘ comment referred to the open lanes Doncic had but refused to enter. This is indeed entirely fixable. Creating those lanes consistently is a different matter and that Doncic will never be someone who just drives to the rim in isolation no matter who's guarding him is something I would completely agree with. It doesn't matter he won't be able to get past anybody, though.


Ettorefm wrote:I'm evaluating the prospect based on his strengths, weaknesses and specially style of play and how his game translates to the NBA, and a playmaker who can create for others, can rebound the ball and shoot from anywhere is exactly what's needed in 2017, but I don't believe his 1 on 1 game will ever be what's expected of him (i.e clutch moments).

Nothing I'd disagree with. I believe that he'll be able to finish games 1-on-1 when his shot is falling but generally speaking it's going to be about PnR's with him and there's nothing wrong with that.

Ettorefm wrote:I mean, Curry gets criticized because he doesn't make teams pay as much as he should when they give him the lane and take his shot out

He does? Curry being able to create great scoring opportunities for himself and his teammates when teams try to take his shot away is exactly what makes Golden State's offense one of the greatest of all-time. Curry has plenty of ways to punish defenses who try to take away his shot and so will Doncic – in slightly different ways, though. If they both need a pick to create those opportunities consistently then so be it, there's nothing wrong or unreliable with that.

Ettorefm wrote:Imagine him playing against the Cavs. Crowder is on him, and they call a pick (Let's say the C is Robin Lopez, he might go to the bulls). Tristan thompson/Love can EASILY matchup against him, and as they're tall and stronger than him, he'd have to blow by them, which is what every other pick n roll ball handler does. But we all know Doncic is not that fast, quick or has a great first step. ALl the space you get by setting a pick for an elite pick'n'roll player like Doncic is negated by simply switching. He can't abuse guys without his shooting.

Virtually every switch creates takes some time or leaves a little more space to do something. It's then on trying to be as effective as possible in this split second and mentally Doncic is more prepared for doing this than any other player his age I can remember. There's a great chance that he'll be able to get past Love, for instance, with some momentum (which he can create by just taking one dribble backwards). Or, if Love sags off, he can pull up. You can also use a second screen, or the same screener again who then gets some momentum towards the basket. There are countless opportunities to create for yourself and others if you can shoot, you're brilliant in reading the game, with no seconds wasted, and you're a passing savant.
Nikson
Junior
Posts: 402
And1: 79
Joined: Oct 21, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#190 » by Nikson » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:53 pm

pacersGM wrote:
J_T wrote:
Here is a question, I hope you don't think it's unfair. All these Euroleague players that Doncic is supposedly not able to beat 1 on 1... what do you think an actual score would have been if they played a first to 11 game? Do you think that Doncic would actually be losing more often than not?


what the .... did i just read? tell me, are you serious with this?
and for guys to have the nerves to come at be after posting a draftexpress made video showing his inability to create in iso? really ? :)

thats your thought process on this, really? nice :)

Now you are in panic.
Nikson
Junior
Posts: 402
And1: 79
Joined: Oct 21, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#191 » by Nikson » Mon Dec 18, 2017 4:59 pm

Ettorefm wrote:
I am genuinely interested in seeing these stats. Where can I look them up? I'm not saying you are wrong, but I really haven't seen this anywhere.


Give me a few minutes, I'll post it


What kind of minutes did you think of ? :wink:
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#192 » by pacersGM » Mon Dec 18, 2017 5:09 pm

1. Name 2 guys who are between 6ft3 and 6ft8 who were or are average quick and average athletes ib general and who are or were superstars? Il wait

2. If gms would draft with stat sheets in their hands and closed eyes then players like denzel valentine, doug mcdermont, tyler hansborough, would be drafted 1,2,or third every year. But no, they are not. They become solid nba players with low ceiling and low bust possibility.

Thats what doncic is. A low bust option on a lot higher level then the 3 guys i mentioned.

But he wont ever become a 1on1 iso wonder, he wont become an elite defender or athlete.

History shows that without that your no superstar. Forget bird
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#193 » by pacersGM » Mon Dec 18, 2017 5:29 pm

and how is the best passer in the world doing in the nba? the myth, the legend teodosic?
how is he doing on the bigger nba court, how are his assists multiplying in the more generous nba ass. counting system?
how come he doesnt get the clippers team keys and doesnt average 10 assists pg? how, as brilliant as he is?
like i predicted with him, he is good for 2-3 flashy passes and a 3pt shot, but he cant carry a team in no way shape or form.
and he cant get even the major minutes from the awesome austin rivers when he is healthy.

the nba is another beast. and not all romantics (bodiroga, teodosic, jasikevicius ...) are cut out for it.usualy the physical freaks with "low iq" and big vertical make the superstar list once they lean the game(giannis, westbrook ...)
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,536
And1: 9,962
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#194 » by The-Power » Mon Dec 18, 2017 5:30 pm

pacersGM wrote:History shows that without that your no superstar. Forget bird

Why should we forget Bird? Because he does not fit your narrative? What you're basically asking is how many players have been superstars who don't leverage their one-on-one skills to create offense – regardless of whether they could have done it more often or not.

In this case, Bird absolutely must be mentioned. Magic would fit this description as well. Curry leverages his shooting to get past defenders most of the time, and doesn't look for one-on-one match-ups frequently unless it's on mismatches. How often do you see Kawhi Leonard isolating on the top of the key and then blowing by his defender? It's also not exactly one of his trademark plays.

Not to mention that the NBA has changed compared to the 90's and 2000's when isolation was a huge part of the game. In today's game it's much less relevant for good teams and most of the time it's being used in (forced) mismatches. Or over the past five decades when big men were primary offensive anchors much more often than today. The superstar of today can look different from what you're used to, and it's time to take this into consideration.

The people who say Doncic needs to be a prolific one-on-one scorer to become a superstar are probably the same people who said you can't anchor elite offenses as a small guard whose primary skill is shooting/scoring – until Curry came along, and with him a bunch of successful score-first PGs. Basketball constantly changes; unfortunately, basketball minds take a lot longer to adjust on average.
J_T
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1,844
Joined: May 07, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#195 » by J_T » Mon Dec 18, 2017 5:32 pm

Ettorefm, I've read your latest posts and here is where I have a problem.

1. First of all, there is nothing wrong with running an efficient game. Maybe I'm biased a bit, because I do think very highly of Steve Nash, I would put him in top 5 best PG's ever. In the history of the league he has run most efficient offense most consistently. You are making it sound like it's a weakness, I consider it a strength.

2. You are mentioning your frustration with him not "going all the way", but instead stopping for a jumper. I absolutely loved when I saw he added this to his game. It has become a very strong weapon for him and he should keep it. I think we have a difference of an opinion when defining "driving ability". I don't consider driving ability to start and end with layup. I think the reason why we might be thinking of that every time we think of driving, is because most of the guards doing it are 6'2 or 6'3. But if you are taller, there is absolutely no reason to go for the layup. It's much harder to get blocked that way as well, and it's much harder to defend by doubling. So if you don't count that as driving, then of course you will get numbers that are not where they should have been. For me that's driving, as it definitely doesn't require finishing to be a layup.

3. In EL season so far he has committed 11 fouls and drawn 74. From my recollection it looks like most of that is a consequence of him driving and defenders not being able to stop him without a foul. That does have to count as part of the driving ability as well, right?
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#196 » by pacersGM » Mon Dec 18, 2017 5:44 pm

The-Power wrote:
The people who say Doncic needs to be a prolific one-on-one scorer to become a superstar are probably the same people who said you can't anchor elite offenses as a small guard whose primary skill is shooting/scoring – until Curry came along, and with him a bunch of successful score-first PGs. Basketball constantly changes; unfortunately, basketball minds take a lot longer to adjust on average.


i dont know how long you watched basketball, but i can ashure you that curry is not one of the first score first point guards.
start by googling marbury and google will take you from there.

so i dont know where those people or you came up with that idea. so i really cant help you with that

and magic johnson was an average athlete at 6 ft 9 pg? wow, really. im learning something new each day.
Ettorefm
Head Coach
Posts: 7,391
And1: 5,260
Joined: Aug 08, 2011
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
 

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#197 » by Ettorefm » Mon Dec 18, 2017 5:47 pm

J_T wrote:Ettorefm, I've read your latest posts and here is where I have a problem.

1. First of all, there is nothing wrong with running an efficient game. Maybe I'm biased a bit, because I do think very highly of Steve Nash, I would put him in top 5 best PG's ever. In the history of the league he has run most efficient offense most consistently. You are making it sound like it's a weakness, I consider it a strength.

2. You are mentioning your frustration with him not "going all the way", but instead stopping for a jumper. I absolutely loved when I saw he added this to his game. It has become a very strong weapon for him and he should keep it. I think we have a difference of an opinion when defining "driving ability". I don't consider driving ability to start and end with layup. I think the reason why we might be thinking of that every time we think of driving, is because most of the guards doing it are 6'2 or 6'3. But if you are taller, there is absolutely no reason to go for the layup. It's much harder to get blocked that way as well, and it's much harder to defend by doubling. So if you don't count that as driving, then of course you will get numbers that are not where they should have been. For me that's driving, as it definitely doesn't require finishing to be a layup.

3. In EL season so far he has committed 11 fouls and drawn 74. From my recollection it looks like most of that is a consequence of him driving and defenders not being able to stop him without a foul. That does have to count as part of the driving ability as well, right?


Great post. I love this kind of discussions. i'll dive into each segment:

1. I completely agree. Nash is my favorite player of all time, I'm a Suns fan, btw. I'm all in favor of playing your strengths and not forcing the issue. The thing is , Nash was never a great scorer. An EFFICIENT and prolific scorer who could go HAM in the playoffs, but he was a 15 ppg scorer in his career. I think Doncic has potential to be a higher scorer for sure.

Doncic is like a taller Steve Nash with the body to play some defense, unlike Nash, wh otried, had the defensive BBIQ, but was constantly abused and exposed. I expect a lot from him.

The thing is, Nash was a complete player. He had everything on offense, and had NO weakneses on his offensive game. He had a great shot from 3pt, which opened the lane for him to score inside the paint against the best rim protectors in the league. He was a complete scorer, even though on low volume.

Doncic is not a 'pick your poison' kind of scorer. He's a one trick pony. the reason why it was so difficult to guard Nash was because he could shoot, drive and pass. you can't go over the screen, you can't go under. He'll make you pay for it.

If you go over and make Doncic drive, I'd be fine as the opposing coach. He'd probably (as he always do) get past the screen and take a midrange shot or stepback for a long 2, which I'm fine with. It's not very effective, and with long NBA defenders hurting his vision with gigantic arms, he won't make them as easily as in Europe.

PS: By one trick pony, I don't mean ''3PT SHOOTER''. I mean shooter, from anywhere on the court. If Curry didn't have a driving game, could make contested layups with either hand or score from tear drops, teams would guard him much easier. Giving Curry the lane is equally stupid, he'll score less because 2 < 3 but he'll still score on most of his attempts.

2. I don't understand your point, honestly. What do you mean by "if you're taller, there is no reason to go for for the layup"? Why would you do a stepback jumper instead of finishing at the rim when you're 6'8, and leave layups to guys who are 6'2? Shouldn't it be the opposite; guys who can easily get blocked by being shorter should use moves like midrange shots and floaters to prevent getting blocked?

3. "From my recollection it looks like most of that is a consequence of him driving and defenders not being able to stop him without a foul"

That's not AT ALL what I've seen. Every single game I've seen (and add highlight videos from games I couldn't watch) in the last two months (when I started focusing on EVERYTHING Doncic related, no game skipped), his fouls are mostly from being extremely smart at drawing fouls from pump fakes and guys trying to block his jumpshot. I remember only two times he drove to the rim and got fouled.

I actually can only remember of a single and1 from him. I'll look up the numbers and see how many And'1s he has.

He's extremely crafty and plays like a vet, making defenders commit and then drawing a stupid foul. It's not like he's going hard to the rim and guys can't do anything, so they have to foul him. I honestly don't understand where you're comin from, because if there is one guy that will do ANYTHING not to shoot a contested layup with contact, it's doncic.
bagsboy wrote:For two hundred years Democrats stole the productive output of slaves and now they seek to enrich themselves with the productive output from the 'rich'. First, Republicans needed to end slavery and next they need to fix taxation with a flat fair tax.
thr3ep01nte4
Junior
Posts: 346
And1: 150
Joined: Oct 31, 2015

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#198 » by thr3ep01nte4 » Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:11 pm

How does Doncic stack up against Trae Young?
Don7
Senior
Posts: 556
And1: 820
Joined: Nov 16, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#199 » by Don7 » Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:37 pm

The thing is, Nash was a complete player. He had everything on offense, and had NO weakneses on his offensive game. He had a great shot from 3pt, which opened the lane for him to score inside the paint against the best rim protectors in the league. He was a complete scorer, even though on low volume.

Doncic is not a 'pick your poison' kind of scorer. He's a one trick pony. the reason why it was so difficult to guard Nash was because he could shoot, drive and pass. you can't go over the screen, you can't go under. He'll make you pay for it.


18 year old Nash on Santa Clara?

I feel you are comparing Nash MVP with Luka.Doncic is a great player already but its still a prospect with a lot of room to improve.
Just this year he added that mid range jumper and it's becoming wet. Every month you see a new move.

About and1



1:20
1:35

Yust in this game.On some postups also(vs efes)



4:40 on drive

Yust took me a few seconds.
Johnny Firpo
RealGM
Posts: 14,173
And1: 9,512
Joined: Apr 17, 2009
 

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#200 » by Johnny Firpo » Mon Dec 18, 2017 8:26 pm

It's amazing how the naysayers in this thread consistently compare peak versions of players to an 18-year-old kid. And they are demanding to be taken seriously. It's hilarious.

Return to NBA Draft