Mirotic12 wrote:UcanUwill wrote:I think Manu was easily better than Llull and Spanoulis, Better than Doncic too for sure. Doncic started the year like a GOAT, but he looked very ordinary as of late.
Manu in Europe - Manu never had a season close to as good as Llull did last year. Manu never carried teams on his back to finals and championships. He played in a super stacked team, which was easily the best team in Europe, and was one of several stars in the team.
Spanoulis carried teams with mid level or lower budgets to 4 finals and 2 championships, with only some help from Printezis in a couple years. No comparison at all in terms of impact and ability to change games.
Manu to Doncic - I honestly can't see any advantage for Manu on an individual level, other than athleticism and defense. Doncic is clearly better in every other way.
Manu has no become quite overrated as to what level of player he was in Europe, due to people that are NBA fans overrating what he did there. The same way people do it for Sabonis. Suddenly they became these unheard of untouchable players in Europe, when the actual fact was they were nothing all that special in EuroLeague.
I remember quite well, that for example, no one considered Manu to be as good as Bodiroga when he was in Europe. He was never thought as even in the discussion for best player in Europe, and people saying otherwise don't remember right, or simply don't know and assume it.
You can make an argument for Doncic being the best player in Europe, something Manu wasn't even in his mid 20s.
Well, Sabonis a age 40 had one of the best individual seasons in Euroleague history. Sponoulis over Manu I give you that, that OLY team was build very well around Spanoulis, just a bunch of defensive juggernauts and Spanoulis + Printezis leading the offense. SImilar to 2001 76ers team. What Spanoulis did with Olympiakos was more impressive, tho I dont think he was the better player obviously.







