LeBron_da_Don wrote:He seems to be what Shaun Livingston was supposed to be
I had the exact same thought.
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus
LeBron_da_Don wrote:He seems to be what Shaun Livingston was supposed to be

slightly OT, but syracuse's schedule has been cupcake city.
jman3134 wrote:slightly OT, but syracuse's schedule has been cupcake city.
It's really not though. This is why I have said on twitter and elsewhere that I am reserving judgment on him. So far I like what I see, but it is tough with who they've played. So far, he seems to have a really good handle and first step.


Cusefan03 wrote:Wow mcw was absolutely TERRIBLE today. He finished with 13 points on 3-15, 7-15 ft and 0-2 from 3 with only 4 assists and 3 turnovers. In the second half he tried to carry the load offensively but absolutely nothing was falling for him. Most of his misses were layups through contact. The only positives I take out of this game were he was still able to get into the lane at will and he got to the line a lot but when your missing more than half of the ft's it pretty much turns into a negative. He had a chance to prove the people who were leary about him that hes a great pg but all he did was increase the skepticism. Even I'm starting to worry about his ability to finish.
Grang33r wrote:Cusefan03 wrote:Wow mcw was absolutely TERRIBLE today. He finished with 13 points on 3-15, 7-15 ft and 0-2 from 3 with only 4 assists and 3 turnovers. In the second half he tried to carry the load offensively but absolutely nothing was falling for him. Most of his misses were layups through contact. The only positives I take out of this game were he was still able to get into the lane at will and he got to the line a lot but when your missing more than half of the ft's it pretty much turns into a negative. He had a chance to prove the people who were leary about him that hes a great pg but all he did was increase the skepticism. Even I'm starting to worry about his ability to finish.
Temple figured a way to play against him. They made him into a shoot first player, instead of pass first. As you saw, he struggled a lot. I like him game a lot though but if he can't get better finishing, i don't think he'll be able to succeed at the next level.
teamjosh04 wrote:Grang33r wrote:Cusefan03 wrote:Wow mcw was absolutely TERRIBLE today. He finished with 13 points on 3-15, 7-15 ft and 0-2 from 3 with only 4 assists and 3 turnovers. In the second half he tried to carry the load offensively but absolutely nothing was falling for him. Most of his misses were layups through contact. The only positives I take out of this game were he was still able to get into the lane at will and he got to the line a lot but when your missing more than half of the ft's it pretty much turns into a negative. He had a chance to prove the people who were leary about him that hes a great pg but all he did was increase the skepticism. Even I'm starting to worry about his ability to finish.
Temple figured a way to play against him. They made him into a shoot first player, instead of pass first. As you saw, he struggled a lot. I like him game a lot though but if he can't get better finishing, i don't think he'll be able to succeed at the next level.
Very true. unlike the cupcakes they played, Temple didn't collapse their defense on him and leave shooters open from 3-pt shots. they took away the easy assists MCW has been getting in the halfcourt and made him prove he can finish himself. and he can't at this point.
as for his touch, thats the least of my worries. he has good touch. dealing with the contact just throws him off.
Here is what I wrote about him today, but this has been my take on him since the beginning of the year:
"Yesterday Michael Carter-Williams showed some of the things Ive been concerned about all year and they lost to Temple. This is why I've been saying lets wait until Big East play. I've had a lot of people ask me why I've been so down on MCW and I feel somewhat vindicated after yesterday. Im not overreacting to one bad game here, everyone else has been overreacting to a string of solid games against a very weak schedule. His flaws have been on display all year.
Carter-Williams is very good in transition and has been able to get into the paint and make the simple pass this year. He has racked up a lot of assists and can see over defenses, but its ridiculous to compare his passing ability to Rubio's or Kendall Marshall's. Those guys have an out of this world knowledge of the game and the ability to see things before they happen. Carter-Williams has a good feel for the game, but is nowhere near the point guard either of them are.
Syracuse did much of their damage in transition play as they have all year. Carter-Williams himself is the key in this, as he is great at forcing turnovers and getting out on the break. His long strides and ability to change directions with good body control are key factors. He also does a good job finding ways to get the ball to teammates.
In the halfcourt, Carter-Williams has been very aggressive. Against San Diego State, Carter-Williams relied on his quick first step and a floater to get his points. He didn't go all the way to the rim against them. After that, Cuse has been playing cupcakes whose centers barely rival MCW in length and he has been able to get into the painted area. He still struggled finishing with contact and that was especially evident yesterday against Temple - their toughest opponent since SDSU.
Carter-Williams relies on his terrific first step to create offense in the halfcourt at this point. He has a good feel for the pick and roll game, but is too turnover prone to run it consistent. He has a loose dribble and combined with his height, struggles in the traffic an on ball screen creates. Its also true when he drives into the lane - that combined with his lack of strength is a big concern.
Syracuse's defense has been able to put their players in position to get overrated by NBA scouts. From Hakim Warrick, Jonny Flynn, Donte Greene, Dion Waiters, Wesley Johnson - these guys have all been major disappointments once they've gotten into the NBA. Carter-Williams is making like Waiters on defense this year - showing good anticipation skills and gambling for a lot of steals. He's a huge threat in this area, but how does it translate?
Carter-Williams will have a sizable learning curve to make up for on defense when he gets to the NBA and his predecessors aren't positive examples of success. He does have great tools on this end of the floor, but it doesn't automatically make him a great defender.
All in all, there can't be a more overrated player in the country right now from a NBA Draft perspective. This is a kid who also has character concerns and that came before the shoplifting incident. He is competitive and has a love for the game which is a positive. Yes he was willing to sit on the bench for a full season and didn't transfer despite contemplating it, but why would he transfer? He would have had to sit out a whole season and he knew that he would be starter this year at Cuse. Its hardly a reason to applaud him.
Carter-Williams wasn't even looked at as a point guard until late in his high school career, and even up until this year, has always been considering a combo guard. He has made great strides in learning the point guard position but still has a long way to go. His potential is definitely worth a first round pick this season but the "best point guard prospect in the country" talk needs to stop."
ManualRam wrote:his form is fine, but he tends to rush his shots. i think he plays a little too fast, which makes him effective in some areas and hurts him in others. will he be as effective if/when he slows his game down a little bit?
he also can't play to contact near the paint. he tries to finish over the defense and take away shot blockers leverage, but he doesn't have the strength to do so.

EddieJonesFan wrote:His problems seem to be fixable though. Isn't that an important distinction when looking at a young prospect like him?
Johnlac1 wrote:How many pgs the size, skills, and athletic ability of MCW are in the NBA? Kidd is 6'4 and past his prime. Dragic is 6'4. Rubio is 6'4. The top pgs are mostly 6'3 and under. You almost have to back to Magic Johnson or Penny Hardawy to find a big pass-first pg with that much potential. Compared to Rubio, he's a better athlete with not quite the court vision or passing ability. But it's still outstanding. And like Rubio, he's a good defensive player. At the moment he can't finish like Kidd in his prime or Dragic, but that can be worked on. Rubio is not a great finisher and cannot get to the basket as well as MCW. MCW's outside shot needs work as well, but it looks better than Rubio's. As a Bucks fan, I'd gladly take him over Jennings. But he'll get picked before the Bucks get a chance at him.
Johnlac1 wrote:How many pgs the size, skills, and athletic ability of MCW are in the NBA? Kidd is 6'4 and past his prime. Dragic is 6'4. Rubio is 6'4. The top pgs are mostly 6'3 and under. You almost have to back to Magic Johnson or Penny Hardawy to find a big pass-first pg with that much potential. Compared to Rubio, he's a better athlete with not quite the court vision or passing ability. But it's still outstanding. And like Rubio, he's a good defensive player. At the moment he can't finish like Kidd in his prime or Dragic, but that can be worked on. Rubio is not a great finisher and cannot get to the basket as well as MCW. MCW's outside shot needs work as well, but it looks better than Rubio's. As a Bucks fan, I'd gladly take him over Jennings. But he'll get picked before the Bucks get a chance at him.