GameBredAPBT wrote:[instagram][/instagram]nolang1 wrote:The DraftExpress writeup of the McDonald's scrimmages has me confident I'll be watching much less college basketball next season. Some takeaways:
The draft is looking weak enough that you can expect to see teams being much more willing to trade first-rounders than in previous years as well as 2018 guys returning to school to get drafted much higher.
R.J Barrett gets Jimmy Butler as an upside comparison, which has some (not me) wondering if such a player would even be a good return for the no. 1 pick.
In addition to the motor stuff, Reddish does not have much confidence shooting the ball and is inconsistent with his mechanics.
Big dropoff after those two with Zion having a tough time scoring outside the paint and Romeo Langford having good tools and scoring instincts but a not so good jumper and overall feel for the game.
Nassir Little and Keldon Johnson helped themselves by competing on defense and showing improved offensive ability, to the point that Little could be the 3rd-best long-term prospect.
Barrett is 1,000x the athlete & prospect that Butler is/was
Obviously (well not obviously because saying 1000x better is just stupid, but I digress), but Butler improved at a rate in the NBA that would be unfair to expect from anyone else and his background is the polar opposite of Barrett's (growing up homeless in a small town in Texas vs. having a dad who was a pro basketball player + high-ranking executive and playing for a big-name basketball academy). The only thing I'm saying is that Butler in my eyes has clearly been one of the top 5-10 players the last two years, so I don't understand how drafting a player who becomes that good or at least has the potential to would be a poor use of the 1st overall selection.