WargamesX wrote:FarBeyondDriven wrote:WargamesX wrote:
I didn’t say it’s the weakest class. I said I think the majority of the wings this class are weak, named a few I like, and I gave the metrics I use to judge wings. I still think the majority of the wings this year are going to struggle to stay in the league.
wasn't directed at you but this board as a whole
Ok that’s fair. I have tried to find good picks this draft and do believe it’s a solid center/pg draft.
yeah, I was just trying to point out to you or anyone else that may (not saying you do) need to become more familiarized with the wing prospects. When the "experts" (Ringer, Athletic, CBS, ESPN) decided this was a weak draft class over a year ago before anyone played, these are the wings they had as first round prospects that made up their talent pool:
Risacher
Buzelis
Holland
Williams
Edwards
Darlan
Biliew
Kugel
Mitchell, Dillon
Evans
Mgbako
Klintman
Dunn
Mitchell, Mark
Buyuktuncel
Brazile
![:lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
more than half of these guys aren't even still in this draft class!
Missing were the following guys who have solidified themselves as bonafide draft prospects, most as top 40 talents:
Salaun
Grant-Foster
Knecht
Watkins
George
Furphy
Smith
Dadiet
Djurisic
Flowers
Lewis
Scheierman
Sallis
Bridges
Tyson
Clifford
Mogbo
despite all of these guys being added to the talent pool and replacing the guys they initially were considering when declaring it a weak draft, none of these "experts" or those on here that regurgitate them, changed their assessment of this draft class. Why is that? How is that possible?
and that's just the wings!
For guards they didn't consider Sheppard, Carter, Mitchell, Carrington or Simpson
For bigs they didn't consider Missi, Chomche, Ighodaro or Perrin
that's 26 total players! Almost a complete first round of players these experts didn't consider when they were creating the narrative that it's the weakest draft since 2013. It'd be funny if it wasn't so absurd. 2024 class isn't elite, it isn't great even. It's probably landing on good for me, but that's such a far cry from "weakest since 2013"
The difference between me and everyone else is I'm judging the actual players in the talent pool. These people are using a year old talent pool missing 26 players!! And if they ARE now considering these 26 players they're essentially saying none of these 26 players makes a difference. That none of these 26 players is any better than the guys they originally had in the talent pool. It's just so laughable.