NO-KG-AI wrote:King Ken wrote:NO-KG-AI wrote:
Cam is a no talent scrub, and always has been, there has never been a single generational trait about him, but that’s never been the issue I had with your analysis of Cam, or now Edey. I don’t see anything egregious or that bad about any of your particular analysis of any players in particular… but
You danced around the topic and circled all the way back around and didn’t touch the main issue: You claim these guys will basically end up busts unless they are on the Hawks, in which case they will not only make it, but they will be MVP or in your words, generational.
I’m not sure if it’s hedging(IE, he was a scrub, but would have been a GOAT in Atl!) or if it’s extreme homerism.
It would feel weird even if it were someone like the Spurs or Heat who have a history of drawing talent out of people, but the Hawks? Lmao. They do nothing special in terms of unlocking guys offensively or player development.
It’s just strange and baffling analysis, but I’m fascinated. We’ve seen no instances of guys going from scrub to generational just based on the team… but you think that mold breaker is the Hawks?
That's your personal opinion. He could be a scrub but his talent is legit. With all his flaws, no way he would have made it to the NBA if he wasn't extremely talented.
I've been as direct as possible.
I've said it could be Luka, Trae, or Harden. Any of those three players who are extremely heliocentric. Who get overproduction from centers that fit the off-ball prototype big man. Capela has easily overproduced his player type. Lively II is averaging more in the NBA than in college per game and per36 because he's playing with Luka. Zubac is averaging career highs playing with Harden. So yes, playing with one of the Harden's or even female Harden (C. Clark, Iowa), will greatly benefit Edey. Especially Trae who uses the center as an extension of himself. Does that help? It's simple, basic af, and even consumable for someone like yourself.
Cool story bro!
Another great sentence
It's not difficult to understand with Edey. It really isn't. If you really watch his game, he's a monster off the ball. That's where he does most of his damage. He's not this skillful strong post-player like B. Reeves or J. Okafor or insanely dominant post-player like Shaq as a college prospect. He's a movement big who uses his relentless motor, mental acuity, top-notch body control, and athleticism for his size to reign on college basketball. The problem is people watch the final stage and see his post-ups are like, he's just big, Boban can do that, etc, etc. But Boban doesn't do any of the other **** to get to that point. Forget that he's a terrific screener and his rolls are exceptional but with his BBIQ, he's a patience roller. His productivity isn't high just cause he's big. He's not even skilled for a low post-big-man NBA prospect.
I don't think he's a mold breaker but he's in his own prototype lane like Brandon Clarke was and Cameron Johnson. When guys are this productive, it's not for no reason.
I don’t hate your analysis on Edey at all, I think my point is that I, and most, disagree with the degree of variance that is there for his game based on the team he goes to.
I don’t think there is a player or scheme in NBA history that takes him from dud to MVP level.
I think he actually succeeds and carves out an NBA career. I think certain lineups could extract even more or less from him, but I don’t think the ceiling is nearly as high.
I’d love to be wrong and see a giant flourish though.
I do appreciate it. I've watched a lot of tape but I watched most after most of my posts in this thread outside of recently of course.
I don't believe he's a dud anywhere at this point. In fact, this is my recent review of what he is as a prospect:
Current: An elite garbageman with freakish athleticism for his size, possessing superior mental attributes and exceptional physical measurements. However, his fluidity limits his offensive potential when he has ball possession. He has superior movement skills and can execute high-level rolls. Elite Screener. His post-up play is limited unless he secures significant positioning in the low post.
Future: An elite garbageman with freakish athleticism for his size, possessing superior mental attributes and exceptional physical measurements. His fluidity, however, limits his offensive potential when he has ball possession. He has superior movement skills and can execute high-level rolls. Elite Screener. His post-up play is limited unless he secures significant positioning in the low-post, with potential for catch and shoot.
Overall, this is probably a 13-15.5 PPG playing 20-22MPG as a rookie. I don't see his upside for most as he will mainly be a screener, dunkers spot finisher, and offensive rebounder who can draw fouls and give good energy at the 5. More than likely a 17-19 PPG scorer with 24 MPG. His PER should be really good and his impact stats should be high but since he needs to be protected some on defense, it will take a team truly to invest in him to really get him to that 28-32MPG spot he has in college.
This is my general take, that's far from a dud. I've watched over 20 full games, possession by possession. He's an excellent player but more of a role player. Should be drafted in the 11-20 range but could fall into the 20s. I doubt he will fall into the 2nd round but since this is a good center class in my scout, this should be it for him.
The Hawks, Clippers, and Mavs all have a Harden. Those guys are different, they really read **** extremely well, and are offensive juggernauts on the ball with their playmaking + scoring. Those guys give these off-ball big-man players a massive push production-wise. Edey is one of the best off-ball bigs we have that's entered in a while. Sadly, he is not much of an on-ball presence but he's figured out how to score using his size, mental acuity, and movement to do a lot of damage offensively. It's not many that enter to be honest. Usually, the elite movement big is as good as it gets but those are exclusively rollers like Clingan for example.
I think Edey is unique. At first, I had major doubts, it didn't really have anything to do with more than his size and his end product but I've really see what he is and while it's not for everyone. He should still be an effective player in the NBA, even if it's as a rotational piece off the bench.