HadAnEffectHere wrote:Miller is absolutely not projecting to be an awesome NBA player, he's going to have a very Brandon Ingram like career of being fringe top 50 forever and this was what basically everyone expected of him.
Anyway, your stat comparisons are really awful because you're specifically focusing on eFG% and not TS% when Ace's inefficiency comes through most obviously in TS% because Ace never got to the line at all. He's a clear step below a lot of these guys when TS% is considered and above basically no one.
I also don't think he's even slightly close to a super freak athlete like Edwards, Brown, or Wiggins. Ace is not very coordinated.
Lol mkay, first Brandon Miller is in his 2nd season and already put up
83% Off epm
64% Def epm
83% Overall
That is basically peak Ingram, so yes if Miller doesn't improve at all from here on out sure he is Brandon Ingram. How many #2 picks are done improving after 2 seasons? Assuming a 2nd year player who averaged 21 ppg is not a good NBA player is just overthinking a very simple answer.
Please show me your statistical analysis and I will tell you it sucks too so we are even lol... again the point of it is that most young wings aren't good playmakers in college and even with Ace's "terrible shot selection" he is shooting the same percentage as elite wing prospects.
I really don't feel great betting against a #2 prospect with great measurables, great athletic testing, elite shot making and great defensive tools. Seems weird the haters are really digging in their heels over Ace averaging 1.3 assists instead of 2 assists per game. And upset with 3.8 fta when Tatum averaged 4.8 and PG averaged 4.6. Those are such minor differences for a guy with his prestige and natural talent.