acrossthecourt wrote:Because right now the number one pick keeps getting compared to Big Country Reeves.
that's new
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

acrossthecourt wrote:Because right now the number one pick keeps getting compared to Big Country Reeves.
acrossthecourt wrote:I'm not a sucker for trends. These are entirely different issues. Your logic train went off the tracks a while ago.
The game has changed. Defense has changed immensely due to rule and style changes. This is not being a "sucker" for changes ... this is realizing it's not the 1970's anymore and there are more valuable things a team can do.
Dirk is a prime counterexample. You're talking about high post offense, not low post, with a PF who can space the floor. That's more valuable than low post offense now! From big men at least.
This is the kind of thinking that made Mark Jackson go to post/iso basketball a ton last year. That was not ideal. Also, it's not really a trend. Even historically speaking it's better for an offense to move the ball outside or through a center who passes a ton, from Wilt finding success when he scored less to Portland's success with Walton to Olajuwon's team success when he started passing more, etc.
People keep saying he *can* learn to pass better, he *can* get in better shape, he *can* play defense -- this is supposed to be a number one pick and a lock. Hey, Leonard and Bledsoe and other non-shooters learned to shoot. How about we ignore any shooting problems a guy has? Marc Gasol slimmed down and won DPOTY. Should we all ignore problems from young kids being fat/out of shape? No, that's all ridiculous.
It's not about a guy not being able to make those changes and make a leap when they hit the NBA. It's more about probability and how it's better to bet on a guy who actually has those skillsets. Because right now the number one pick has lousy defense and he keeps getting compared to Al Jefferson and Big Country Reeves. That's not selling me. He could make vast improvements, sure, and so can everyone else.
(Hey, but at least he has that huge wingspan.)
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
HeartBreakKid wrote:I agree, the idea that Okafor is a "can't miss" talent is a little silly, I mean have the standards dropped that low for centers? Can't miss guy would describe guys like Duncan and Ewing.
E-Balla wrote:HeartBreakKid wrote:I agree, the idea that Okafor is a "can't miss" talent is a little silly, I mean have the standards dropped that low for centers? Can't miss guy would describe guys like Duncan and Ewing.
Duncan and Ewing were seniors coming out and weren't considered can't miss until they were 20. Jahlil started the season at 18. The standard hasn't dropped we are just dealing with younger players.

E-Balla wrote:HeartBreakKid wrote:I agree, the idea that Okafor is a "can't miss" talent is a little silly, I mean have the standards dropped that low for centers? Can't miss guy would describe guys like Duncan and Ewing.
Duncan and Ewing were seniors coming out and weren't considered can't miss until they were 20. Jahlil started the season at 18. The standard hasn't dropped we are just dealing with younger players.
HeartBreakKid wrote:E-Balla wrote:HeartBreakKid wrote:I agree, the idea that Okafor is a "can't miss" talent is a little silly, I mean have the standards dropped that low for centers? Can't miss guy would describe guys like Duncan and Ewing.
Duncan and Ewing were seniors coming out and weren't considered can't miss until they were 20. Jahlil started the season at 18. The standard hasn't dropped we are just dealing with younger players.
I'm aware those players were older, but even in this era Okafor is not really a generational prospect. Davis was also a center who was the same age and he was a much better prospect, and was certainly a can't miss type of player. Oden and Durant a few years before that.
I just don't think it is that crazy to pass up on him, I think he has some valid question marks and this draft is pretty damn talented. I would probably take Okafor over Wiggins and Parker last year, and those guys were very excellent prospects in their own right. That's probably the same tier I'd put him in, the same tier as Wiggins and Parker - but someone like a Joel Embiid I would have drafted over Okafor.
Justwar wrote:I don't think your giving towns credit on offense eballa the gap is closing pretty fast. Towns is super skilled
DickGrayson wrote:What does Okafor do outside of 10 feet?
kbitboc wrote:If it was last year's Joel Embiid with no health concerns whatsoever, would he be considered a better prospect than Okafor and Towns? Would he be the consensus higher pick?

djphan wrote:
where towns has a huge edge is on defense... and really it's not close.. you can say okafor can be a good defender but there is zero evidence to suggest that he will be other than wishful thinking... if you wanna go by the numbers or if you want to go by the eye test... there just hasn't been a defender this bad turning into something even decent...
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.