Wade Baldwin

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#41 » by doordoor123 » Sat May 14, 2016 3:23 am

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
Fischella wrote:I think he was a lock to go lotto all year long, likely to go somewhere between MIN, NOLA, DEN, SAC, MIL, ORL, UTH, CHI.

Has a really good case for been a top10 pick.
I can't see how he doesnt go top14, he could go as high as 4 if Phila gets LA's pick.


A big thing at the combine is that there are teams that don't like his demeanor and attitude. But I'm sure the teams that don't mind won't mind taking him earlier.


Where did you read this?


Go to the thread Predicting the draft. Chad Ford says it in a recent article and two more people say it. Polarizing.
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,141
And1: 7,821
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#42 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Sat May 14, 2016 4:05 am

doordoor123 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
A big thing at the combine is that there are teams that don't like his demeanor and attitude. But I'm sure the teams that don't mind won't mind taking him earlier.


Where did you read this?


Go to the thread Predicting the draft. Chad Ford says it in a recent article and two more people say it. Polarizing.


Thanks.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
User avatar
MalonesElbows
Starter
Posts: 2,421
And1: 1,487
Joined: Sep 14, 2009
     

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#43 » by MalonesElbows » Sat May 14, 2016 7:47 pm

Utah will probably take him or Demetrius Jackson. As much as the fan base hypes Exum, he is a 5 PER player that just tore is ACL, so is an unknown. I don't see Utah in love with any of the wings or bigs, a lot of red flags on any of them at 12, so Baldwin would make some sense. Bucks might nab him also, choosing to pass on someone super raw like Skal.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#44 » by KqWIN » Sat May 14, 2016 8:42 pm

MalonesElbows wrote:Utah will probably take him or Demetrius Jackson. As much as the fan base hypes Exum, he is a 5 PER player that just tore is ACL, so is an unknown. I don't see Utah in love with any of the wings or bigs, a lot of red flags on any of them at 12, so Baldwin would make some sense. Bucks might nab him also, choosing to pass on someone super raw like Skal.


I think it makes very little sense at all to draft a point guard for the sake of drafting a point guard. A rookie PG, especially outside of the top 10, is no guarantee at all. Jackson or Baldwin may be the highest guy on their board at 12, but the idea of fixing the PG position by throwing in another young and inexperienced PG doesn't add up to me. If your issue with the PG position is that Exum is unknown, it wouldn't makes sense to fix it by throwing in another unkown.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#45 » by doordoor123 » Sun May 15, 2016 2:58 pm

KqWIN wrote:
MalonesElbows wrote:Utah will probably take him or Demetrius Jackson. As much as the fan base hypes Exum, he is a 5 PER player that just tore is ACL, so is an unknown. I don't see Utah in love with any of the wings or bigs, a lot of red flags on any of them at 12, so Baldwin would make some sense. Bucks might nab him also, choosing to pass on someone super raw like Skal.


I think it makes very little sense at all to draft a point guard for the sake of drafting a point guard. A rookie PG, especially outside of the top 10, is no guarantee at all. Jackson or Baldwin may be the highest guy on their board at 12, but the idea of fixing the PG position by throwing in another young and inexperienced PG doesn't add up to me. If your issue with the PG position is that Exum is unknown, it wouldn't makes sense to fix it by throwing in another unkown.


The team has also said on multiple occasions that they want players that can come in and help out immediately. They apparently really like Marquese Chriss and Jakob Poeltl a lot. I've also heard they could trade back because they like players that will get drafted later on.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,665
And1: 11,761
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#46 » by HotelVitale » Sun May 15, 2016 4:30 pm

doordoor123 wrote:
KqWIN wrote:
MalonesElbows wrote:Utah will probably take him or Demetrius Jackson. As much as the fan base hypes Exum, he is a 5 PER player that just tore is ACL, so is an unknown. I don't see Utah in love with any of the wings or bigs, a lot of red flags on any of them at 12, so Baldwin would make some sense. Bucks might nab him also, choosing to pass on someone super raw like Skal.
I think it makes very little sense at all to draft a point guard for the sake of drafting a point guard. A rookie PG, especially outside of the top 10, is no guarantee at all. Jackson or Baldwin may be the highest guy on their board at 12, but the idea of fixing the PG position by throwing in another young and inexperienced PG doesn't add up to me. If your issue with the PG position is that Exum is unknown, it wouldn't makes sense to fix it by throwing in another unkown.
The team has also said on multiple occasions that they want players that can come in and help out immediately. They apparently really like Marquese Chriss and Jakob Poeltl a lot. I've also heard they could trade back because they like players that will get drafted later on.


Chriss might be the lotto pick that's least likely to help any decent team next year. In any case, he's definitely not a guy you'd pick cuz he can chip in right now.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#47 » by doordoor123 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:58 pm

HotelVitale wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
KqWIN wrote: I think it makes very little sense at all to draft a point guard for the sake of drafting a point guard. A rookie PG, especially outside of the top 10, is no guarantee at all. Jackson or Baldwin may be the highest guy on their board at 12, but the idea of fixing the PG position by throwing in another young and inexperienced PG doesn't add up to me. If your issue with the PG position is that Exum is unknown, it wouldn't makes sense to fix it by throwing in another unkown.
The team has also said on multiple occasions that they want players that can come in and help out immediately. They apparently really like Marquese Chriss and Jakob Poeltl a lot. I've also heard they could trade back because they like players that will get drafted later on.


Chriss might be the lotto pick that's least likely to help any decent team next year. In any case, he's definitely not a guy you'd pick cuz he can chip in right now.


Completely disagree. Not as raw as a lot of people are saying.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#48 » by KqWIN » Sun May 15, 2016 5:01 pm

doordoor123 wrote:The team has also said on multiple occasions that they want players that can come in and help out immediately. They apparently really like Marquese Chriss and Jakob Poeltl a lot. I've also heard they could trade back because they like players that will get drafted later on.


Not sure that is entirely true. Saying on multiple occasions is not the same thing as a few tweets from a reporter that are just as much speculation than anything. When were these multiple occasions by the way? I'm interested.
User avatar
freewhitemoon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,837
And1: 1,351
Joined: Oct 14, 2015
 

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#49 » by freewhitemoon » Sun May 15, 2016 5:04 pm

he's a bad rebounder, passer and defender. Only thing he does at the moment is dunk and shoot a bit and it's hard to foresee how quickly his range will translate. Clearly a project pick
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#50 » by doordoor123 » Sun May 15, 2016 5:15 pm

KqWIN wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:The team has also said on multiple occasions that they want players that can come in and help out immediately. They apparently really like Marquese Chriss and Jakob Poeltl a lot. I've also heard they could trade back because they like players that will get drafted later on.


Not sure that is entirely true. Saying on multiple occasions is not the same thing as a few tweets from a reporter that are just as much speculation than anything. When were these multiple occasions by the way? I'm interested.


Actually in interviews with multiple members of the staff. Every time Snyder is interviewed on the subject, it's exactly what he says. Maybe you've only seen tweets, but I've actually listened to interviews.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#51 » by KqWIN » Sun May 15, 2016 5:21 pm

doordoor123 wrote:
KqWIN wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:The team has also said on multiple occasions that they want players that can come in and help out immediately. They apparently really like Marquese Chriss and Jakob Poeltl a lot. I've also heard they could trade back because they like players that will get drafted later on.


Not sure that is entirely true. Saying on multiple occasions is not the same thing as a few tweets from a reporter that are just as much speculation than anything. When were these multiple occasions by the way? I'm interested.


Actually in interviews with multiple members of the staff. Every time Snyder is interviewed on the subject, it's exactly what he says. Maybe you've only seen tweets, but I've actually listened to interviews.


Funny because, I listen to every interview from Dennis Lindsey or Quin Snyder I can get my hands on, but I guess I'll have to take your word for it. If you ever find those interviews, I'd love to listen them.
SmokeyPaw
Starter
Posts: 2,207
And1: 1,163
Joined: May 14, 2016
 

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#52 » by SmokeyPaw » Sun May 15, 2016 10:25 pm

Baldwin had dropped on Ford's board recently, due to leadership/coachability concerns. He's expected to move back up Monday after the combine. Apparently did well in some interviews.

Interesting article on WB: http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/college/vanderbilt/2015/12/25/wade-baldwin-serves-vanderbilts-challenger/76930228/ . His parents were DEA and FBI agents.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 28,877
And1: 8,859
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#53 » by Chi town » Mon May 16, 2016 3:22 pm

SmokeyPaw wrote:Baldwin had dropped on Ford's board recently, due to leadership/coachability concerns. He's expected to move back up Monday after the combine. Apparently did well in some interviews.

Interesting article on WB: http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/college/vanderbilt/2015/12/25/wade-baldwin-serves-vanderbilts-challenger/76930228/ . His parents were DEA and FBI agents.


Interesting read.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,429
And1: 9,792
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#54 » by M-C-G » Mon May 16, 2016 3:30 pm

Chi town wrote:
SmokeyPaw wrote:Baldwin had dropped on Ford's board recently, due to leadership/coachability concerns. He's expected to move back up Monday after the combine. Apparently did well in some interviews.

Interesting article on WB: http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/college/vanderbilt/2015/12/25/wade-baldwin-serves-vanderbilts-challenger/76930228/ . His parents were DEA and FBI agents.


Interesting read.


Sounds like kind of a different dude. Seems ultra competitive, and maybe that gets him in some trouble, but nothing I have seen scares me with him. He is absolutely the guy I take at 10 right now for the Bucks.
PickMeUpASixer
Junior
Posts: 269
And1: 93
Joined: May 02, 2014
 

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#55 » by PickMeUpASixer » Mon May 16, 2016 5:39 pm

freewhitemoon wrote:he's a bad rebounder, passer and defender. Only thing he does at the moment is dunk and shoot a bit and it's hard to foresee how quickly his range will translate. Clearly a project pick


6.5 A/40 and 5.5 RB/40 are both strong numbers...
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,494
And1: 16,315
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#56 » by Dr Positivity » Mon May 16, 2016 6:10 pm

Tough history for NBA players who were in need of any sort of therapy and he sounds like a candidate by the way he talks about things like controlling anger like it's a part of his life. Would think teams background checks will be important
Liberate The Zoomers
User avatar
kennydorglas
Suns Forum Statistical Savant
Posts: 8,892
And1: 6,125
Joined: Jul 31, 2012
Location: Bauru SP
Contact:
       

Re: Wade Baldwin 

Post#57 » by kennydorglas » Mon May 16, 2016 8:13 pm

Image

He's probably one of the most complete players in this draft.
"I got nothing to prove in this league. I’m a max player, and I’ll continue to be a max player."
Five foot Eighton

“No matter what you do or how you do it, as long as you have true passion you will succeed.”
Luis “WEEZY” Egurrola

Return to NBA Draft