doordoor123 wrote:Lol what? How are you disagreeing with me? A better shooter when you're 7'2 you can just dominate the game by standing next to the basket, but he learned to shoot. He also has good footwork in the post. None of that is natural ability. Shooting is repetition and muscle memeory. Post game is actually really hard and why a lot of centers have a hard time learning how to play in the post.
I find it ridiculous to say that one player is more dedicated because he is more skilled. Michael Beasley is infinitely more skilled than someone like Tony Allen, but that doesn't mean he is more dedicated to becoming a better player. Take a look at all the D-League guys that are just a shot away from being an NBA caliber players. You can bet that those guys are working everyday to become a better shooter, but there's still going to be guys that will better shooters after putting in a fraction of the work.
Skill development requires hard work, but hard work doesn't guarantee skill development. People always say that shooting can be taught, and while that's true it doesn't mean that everyone can be taught. Most guys that can't shoot coming into the league end up not being able to shoot, and it's not because they didn't work at it. The ones that do improve are the exceptions. If all took to become a great shooter was hard work, there would be a whole lot more great shooters in the league.
They are completely different players coming into the league, which is why I'm lukewarm on the comparison. If you want to say that Jeanne is more dedicated to becoming a better jump shooter, fine, but that doesn't mean he has a better work ethic than Gobert. That because it isn't a part of Gobert's game. If Gobert had been working on his post moves and shooting ability this whole time he'd either still be in the D-League or back in Europe.
Also, you don't just dominate the game because you're 7'2. If that's the case, you could just as easily say that Jeanne is lazy and doesn't want to dominate the game. He shoots >50% from the field, hardly domination.