Jonathan Jeanne

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

User avatar
12footrim
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,457
And1: 2,387
Joined: Jul 09, 2012

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#41 » by 12footrim » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:35 am

Gam wrote:
zzaj wrote:Maybe a bit like Thon Maker but with a lower athletic ceiling and upside at different respective positions? FWIW, in time, I don't think either will ever be much more than 8th-9th bench players in the NBA. Just too much ground to make up in BBIQ and feel for the game at the NBA pace.

Or Hasheem Thabeet, maybe?


Thon has been starting and playing 5-20 minutes a night for us since before the ASB. His ceiling is much closer to Perennial All-Star than it is to 8th-9th man.


That's a leap if I've ever heard one. Rookie classes every year have plenty of guys with similar statistical profiles and impact if not superior ones and far far more fizzle out of the NBA or never amount to anything more than the few that ever pan out to being an All Star. This guy also has the suspicion he's could be 24 years old on top of it which would make that less of a realistic reality.
User avatar
SlowPaced
RealGM
Posts: 12,708
And1: 17,487
Joined: Jan 28, 2013
Location: An Inconvenient Place
   

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#42 » by SlowPaced » Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:47 am

I haven't seen this dude play, but based on what I've heard and read, he seems to be a Lucas Nogueira type.

Nogueira really figured it out defensively this season but he's trash on offense.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#43 » by doordoor123 » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:43 pm

SlowPaced wrote:I haven't seen this dude play, but based on what I've heard and read, he seems to be a Lucas Nogueira type.

Nogueira really figured it out defensively this season but he's trash on offense.


If you haven't watched him play, how do you think he's a Nogueira type? Because I don't see that at all. Jeanne is more of a PF than C.
User avatar
SlowPaced
RealGM
Posts: 12,708
And1: 17,487
Joined: Jan 28, 2013
Location: An Inconvenient Place
   

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#44 » by SlowPaced » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:57 pm

doordoor123 wrote:
SlowPaced wrote:I haven't seen this dude play, but based on what I've heard and read, he seems to be a Lucas Nogueira type.

Nogueira really figured it out defensively this season but he's trash on offense.


If you haven't watched him play, how do you think he's a Nogueira type? Because I don't see that at all. Jeanne is more of a PF than C.


I wrote "based on what I've heard and read" for a reason.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#45 » by doordoor123 » Wed Apr 26, 2017 3:43 pm

SlowPaced wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
SlowPaced wrote:I haven't seen this dude play, but based on what I've heard and read, he seems to be a Lucas Nogueira type.

Nogueira really figured it out defensively this season but he's trash on offense.


If you haven't watched him play, how do you think he's a Nogueira type? Because I don't see that at all. Jeanne is more of a PF than C.


I wrote "based on what I've heard and read" for a reason.


No, I got that. But I also don't trust the stuff you've heard and read because I think there are a lot of people out there giving bad information on Jeanne specifically.
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#46 » by retrobro90 » Fri May 12, 2017 6:51 am

Theres some pretty basic stuff that could make Jeanne really deadly as an NBA pro. He just needs to build chemistry and work on his timing out of the PnR but he would be such a threat given his size/length and quickness. I like him as a prospect because it seems like most of his weaknesses are correctable with good coaching and experience.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,540
And1: 4,036
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#47 » by EvanZ » Sat May 13, 2017 4:33 pm

As I predicted Jeanne opened up a lot of eyes at the Combine. We're looking at one of the most intriguing guys in this Draft, who could move way, way up. Maybe even a lottery pick after he works out with teams.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#48 » by Showtime:Part2 » Sat May 13, 2017 6:08 pm

EvanZ wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
Are you trolling again or is this a real take?


Do you watch basketball or nah?


Yeah, but I'm not sure we're watching the same game. Are we talking about the Ingram that shot 62% from the free throw line, 29% on 3s, 47.4% TS overall, 8.5 PER, and ranked #459 in RPM this season? That Ingram?

Because that Ingram was terrible as a rookie on both ends of the court. He shows some flashes of something, but he's very far from being a useful NBA player.

But, of course, now you'll tell me you were trolling. Just as you did a few years after telling me Jimmer would be an All-Star. :lol:


13 and 4 on 52% ts post asb w terrific d vs 8 and 4 on 45% pre asb. Do your homework first
Warspite:

Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,540
And1: 4,036
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#49 » by EvanZ » Sat May 13, 2017 10:03 pm

Showtime:Part2 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
Do you watch basketball or nah?


Yeah, but I'm not sure we're watching the same game. Are we talking about the Ingram that shot 62% from the free throw line, 29% on 3s, 47.4% TS overall, 8.5 PER, and ranked #459 in RPM this season? That Ingram?

Because that Ingram was terrible as a rookie on both ends of the court. He shows some flashes of something, but he's very far from being a useful NBA player.

But, of course, now you'll tell me you were trolling. Just as you did a few years after telling me Jimmer would be an All-Star. :lol:


13 and 4 on 52% ts post asb w terrific d vs 8 and 4 on 45% pre asb. Do your homework first


Uh, ok. Am I supposed to be impressed by more minutes and slightly more efficient half-season? Because I'm not.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
dorkestra
RealGM
Posts: 10,387
And1: 12,675
Joined: Mar 03, 2013

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#50 » by dorkestra » Wed May 24, 2017 4:06 am

I really like Jonathan Jeanne. I am tricking myself into seeing a little bit of Rudy. The agility and length combination is enticing.
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,927
And1: 16,925
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#51 » by GimmeDat » Wed May 24, 2017 4:15 am

He's going to have to put on a fair bit of weight, but the tools are there.

From the recent hype around him he sounds like a definite 1st rounder.
Mr.Raptorsingh
RealGM
Posts: 34,955
And1: 28,585
Joined: May 17, 2007
 

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#52 » by Mr.Raptorsingh » Wed May 24, 2017 4:33 am

Definitely needs to put on some considerable weight imo. I'd be hesitant to play him in a NBA game if I were a coach based on where he is right now.
dorkestra
RealGM
Posts: 10,387
And1: 12,675
Joined: Mar 03, 2013

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#53 » by dorkestra » Wed May 24, 2017 5:31 am

If you're picking late lotto or mid teens, there isn't a higher ceiling guy you could take IMO. We'll look back in a few years and wonder how he wasn't consensus top five. He'll be a hell of a lot better than Isaac, Monk, either Collins, and any other big man in this draft will be, IMO.
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,461
And1: 11,041
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#54 » by Catchall » Wed May 24, 2017 8:55 pm

He's a polarizing prospect, a bit like Thon Maker last year.....which, as it turns out, might serve as a rough comp for him as a player at this stage.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,540
And1: 4,036
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#55 » by EvanZ » Wed May 24, 2017 10:49 pm

He's light enough to be a 4 today, he'll definitely be a 5 in time. You're looking at Rudy Gobert with better shot, better mobility, and handles.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#56 » by KqWIN » Thu May 25, 2017 12:27 am

I'd caution the Rudy Gobert comparison. It's an easy connection to make, but there's a lot more to Rudy Gobert than his measurables.

I don't really now much about his mental makeup, but that will be key here. He's going to need to have a great deal of work ethic, passion, and desire to be great. That's true for every prospect, but especially guys for prospects like this. If he gets discouraged he could flame out of the league quickly.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#57 » by doordoor123 » Thu May 25, 2017 1:27 am

KqWIN wrote:I'd caution the Rudy Gobert comparison. It's an easy connection to make, but there's a lot more to Rudy Gobert than his measurables.

I don't really now much about his mental makeup, but that will be key here. He's going to need to have a great deal of work ethic, passion, and desire to be great. That's true for every prospect, but especially guys for prospects like this. If he gets discouraged he could flame out of the league quickly.


To learn the footwork and to have a jump shot shows more dedication than Gobert had. Gobert was pretty much just a guy with great measureables.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#58 » by KqWIN » Thu May 25, 2017 1:47 am

doordoor123 wrote:
KqWIN wrote:I'd caution the Rudy Gobert comparison. It's an easy connection to make, but there's a lot more to Rudy Gobert than his measurables.

I don't really now much about his mental makeup, but that will be key here. He's going to need to have a great deal of work ethic, passion, and desire to be great. That's true for every prospect, but especially guys for prospects like this. If he gets discouraged he could flame out of the league quickly.


To learn the footwork and to have a jump shot shows more dedication than Gobert had. Gobert was pretty much just a guy with great measureables.


I completely disagree. Being a better shooter or more skillful player does not show that you have more dedication. Different players work on different things, and there's a great deal of natural ability involved with all skills.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#59 » by doordoor123 » Thu May 25, 2017 3:25 am

KqWIN wrote:
doordoor123 wrote:
KqWIN wrote:I'd caution the Rudy Gobert comparison. It's an easy connection to make, but there's a lot more to Rudy Gobert than his measurables.

I don't really now much about his mental makeup, but that will be key here. He's going to need to have a great deal of work ethic, passion, and desire to be great. That's true for every prospect, but especially guys for prospects like this. If he gets discouraged he could flame out of the league quickly.


To learn the footwork and to have a jump shot shows more dedication than Gobert had. Gobert was pretty much just a guy with great measureables.


I completely disagree. Being a better shooter or more skillful player does not show that you have more dedication. Different players work on different things, and there's a great deal of natural ability involved with all skills.


Lol what? How are you disagreeing with me? A better shooter when you're 7'2 you can just dominate the game by standing next to the basket, but he learned to shoot. He also has good footwork in the post. None of that is natural ability. Shooting is repetition and muscle memeory. Post game is actually really hard and why a lot of centers have a hard time learning how to play in the post.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: Jonathan Jeanne 

Post#60 » by KqWIN » Thu May 25, 2017 3:57 am

doordoor123 wrote:Lol what? How are you disagreeing with me? A better shooter when you're 7'2 you can just dominate the game by standing next to the basket, but he learned to shoot. He also has good footwork in the post. None of that is natural ability. Shooting is repetition and muscle memeory. Post game is actually really hard and why a lot of centers have a hard time learning how to play in the post.


I find it ridiculous to say that one player is more dedicated because he is more skilled. Michael Beasley is infinitely more skilled than someone like Tony Allen, but that doesn't mean he is more dedicated to becoming a better player. Take a look at all the D-League guys that are just a shot away from being an NBA caliber players. You can bet that those guys are working everyday to become a better shooter, but there's still going to be guys that will better shooters after putting in a fraction of the work.

Skill development requires hard work, but hard work doesn't guarantee skill development. People always say that shooting can be taught, and while that's true it doesn't mean that everyone can be taught. Most guys that can't shoot coming into the league end up not being able to shoot, and it's not because they didn't work at it. The ones that do improve are the exceptions. If all took to become a great shooter was hard work, there would be a whole lot more great shooters in the league.

They are completely different players coming into the league, which is why I'm lukewarm on the comparison. If you want to say that Jeanne is more dedicated to becoming a better jump shooter, fine, but that doesn't mean he has a better work ethic than Gobert. That because it isn't a part of Gobert's game. If Gobert had been working on his post moves and shooting ability this whole time he'd either still be in the D-League or back in Europe.

Also, you don't just dominate the game because you're 7'2. If that's the case, you could just as easily say that Jeanne is lazy and doesn't want to dominate the game. He shoots >50% from the field, hardly domination.

Return to NBA Draft