KobesScarf wrote:It's as simple as could be you just have your mind made up already
After reading through this argument.... This is the pot calling the kettle black.
Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831
KobesScarf wrote:It's as simple as could be you just have your mind made up already
GimmeDat wrote:You guys think he can play some 3, if not immediately, at least down the road? He's 6'5 with a 6'10 wingspan, and of course, super athletic, can play bigger than his size.

Fischella wrote:I am not huge on his defense and I think people are putting him in that box when he is just all over the place, he has tools but like DJ Stephens or McDaniels had, and were never really sound defenders.
What I do like it's his offensive upside, has some creation to his game, can pass, and I think the shooting might end up been good too, I think somebody compared him to Oladipo and I can see that in time.
I think he should come back probably though, with a season in which he proves to be worth of a higher usage, he can easily go top10, and this year I think he goes late 1st at best, a ton depends on workouts for him though.
clyde21 wrote:KobesScarf wrote:clyde21 wrote:
Literally everything? That's your answer to my question when I said be specific?![]()
So you think 21-year-old rookie Zhaire Smith is going to be better than 21-year-old Zhaire Smith with already a year under his belt in the NBA?
Mkay buddy.
Do I need to list every aspect of basketball?
Anyway I think he should stay all 4 years in college so the difference is 19 year old rookie vs 22 year old rookie. Or better yet 22 year old rookie vs 22 year old last year of his rookie contract with a new HC or soon to be fired HC
But you think a 22-year-old rookie Zhaire Smith is better than 22-year-old Zhaire Smith who's going to be entering his 3rd year in the league?
Makes ZERO sense on any level.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.

vincecarter4pres wrote:Call me crazy, but I don't think I can name more than 2 or 3 guys in this draft I'd take over him.
Ruzious wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:Call me crazy, but I don't think I can name more than 2 or 3 guys in this draft I'd take over him.
You may be crazy, but he's a player who does things with his combo of athleticism and body control that other players physically cannot do. If I'm a GM, he's one of a few players in this draft that I'd target - you can likely get him later than he should go.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
EvanZ wrote:I feel like MKG was taken #2 for less valid reasons, so I'm fine with Zhaire going 5-10. Zhaire's shot is not broken, not a guarantee he becomes a great shooter, but it's sure as hell more likely than some guys I've seen recently.
EvanZ wrote:I feel like MKG was taken #2 for less valid reasons, so I'm fine with Zhaire going 5-10. Zhaire's shot is not broken, not a guarantee he becomes a great shooter, but it's sure as hell more likely than some guys I've seen recently.
Fischella wrote:EvanZ wrote:I feel like MKG was taken #2 for less valid reasons, so I'm fine with Zhaire going 5-10. Zhaire's shot is not broken, not a guarantee he becomes a great shooter, but it's sure as hell more likely than some guys I've seen recently.
Zhaire is also not close to the defender MKG was though
I am fine with him at any point after the top8-9 guys, but I understand why teams would take more of a wait&see approach with him, he probably ends up coming back, I think for him there is very little risk and a lot to gain by doing so