Nic Claxton

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

Kalela
RealGM
Posts: 13,537
And1: 12,401
Joined: May 16, 2011
Location: Northern Kentucky
   

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#41 » by Kalela » Tue Jun 18, 2019 1:07 pm

clyde21 wrote:
Kalela wrote:I will admit I didn't watch either - more Hayes than Claxton - play much but Hayes and Claxton are almost identical in everything. Why is one projected to be a lottery player and the other a late first round pick in every mock draft?


hmm, Clax and Hayes are not really all that similar, Clax can stretch and shoot somewhat, while Hayes is a more traditional big with a bigger/stronger body.


Production wise they are similar players. Claxton is only one year older. Why is one considered a lottery talent and the other an end of the round talent?
Edit: Extend Mazzulla
pad300
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,995
And1: 418
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#42 » by pad300 » Tue Jun 18, 2019 4:30 pm

Kalela wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Kalela wrote:I will admit I didn't watch either - more Hayes than Claxton - play much but Hayes and Claxton are almost identical in everything. Why is one projected to be a lottery player and the other a late first round pick in every mock draft?


hmm, Clax and Hayes are not really all that similar, Clax can stretch and shoot somewhat, while Hayes is a more traditional big with a bigger/stronger body.


Production wise they are similar players. Claxton is only one year older. Why is one considered a lottery talent and the other an end of the round talent?


Efficiency. TS%. Claxton .533 vs Hayes .739
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,563
And1: 69,990
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#43 » by clyde21 » Tue Jun 18, 2019 4:45 pm

Kalela wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Kalela wrote:I will admit I didn't watch either - more Hayes than Claxton - play much but Hayes and Claxton are almost identical in everything. Why is one projected to be a lottery player and the other a late first round pick in every mock draft?


hmm, Clax and Hayes are not really all that similar, Clax can stretch and shoot somewhat, while Hayes is a more traditional big with a bigger/stronger body.


Production wise they are similar players. Claxton is only one year older. Why is one considered a lottery talent and the other an end of the round talent?


i don't know what 'production wise they're similar players' even means...again, different body types, different skill sets, Hayes has a better inside/roll game while Claxton has a better outside/shooting game. Hayes a better rim protector, Clax much more of a passer.

also, a lot of people do think Clax is a top 20 guy, some have him slotted 17 to Atlanta.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,563
And1: 69,990
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#44 » by clyde21 » Tue Jun 18, 2019 4:46 pm

pad300 wrote:
Kalela wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
hmm, Clax and Hayes are not really all that similar, Clax can stretch and shoot somewhat, while Hayes is a more traditional big with a bigger/stronger body.


Production wise they are similar players. Claxton is only one year older. Why is one considered a lottery talent and the other an end of the round talent?


Efficiency. TS%. Claxton .533 vs Hayes .739


to be fair the types of shots they take aren't similar at all, so we can't really judge their TS%s... but that goes back to them not really being all that similar at this point
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,245
And1: 5,237
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#45 » by Kilo » Wed Jun 19, 2019 3:17 pm

Late invite into the draft green room. 21 invited to be there now.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 44,929
And1: 17,063
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#46 » by Jamaaliver » Wed Jun 19, 2019 3:24 pm

^That's too many invites.

He COULD be WAITING...FOR A LOOOOONG TIME.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,245
And1: 5,237
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#47 » by Kilo » Wed Jun 19, 2019 5:35 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:^That's too many invites.

He COULD be WAITING...FOR A LOOOOONG TIME.


League does their homework with the invitation lists. To add him a day before the draft - somebody went out of their way to get him there. His agent likely went to the league with something and then the league reached out to teams to see where they had him falling on their boards.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 44,929
And1: 17,063
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#48 » by Jamaaliver » Wed Jun 19, 2019 5:41 pm

I've seen it not work out so well...in both the NBA and NFL.

Spoiler:
Rashard Lewis wrote:You know I was just a kid. I was just 18 years old, excited about being drafted to the NBA. I felt like all of Houston was watching me. My high school was watching me. I think they had a draft party at my coach's house. I'll never forget that day, being in the green room with my family and my agent.

As my name was getting passed, I couldn't even take it no more and I had to leave and go to the restroom because I didn't want nobody to see how hurt I was. So I started crying in the restroom while nobody was around.
SB Nation

If I wasn't likely to go in the top 15 picks...I'd likely just setup a watch party at home or school. Surrounded by family and friends.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,531
And1: 4,030
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#49 » by EvanZ » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:08 pm

Kalela wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Kalela wrote:I will admit I didn't watch either - more Hayes than Claxton - play much but Hayes and Claxton are almost identical in everything. Why is one projected to be a lottery player and the other a late first round pick in every mock draft?


hmm, Clax and Hayes are not really all that similar, Clax can stretch and shoot somewhat, while Hayes is a more traditional big with a bigger/stronger body.


Production wise they are similar players. Claxton is only one year older. Why is one considered a lottery talent and the other an end of the round talent?


I dunno, they are 10 and 11 for me. 8-)
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
Coeur
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,805
And1: 668
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#50 » by Coeur » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:28 pm

Kalela wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Kalela wrote:I will admit I didn't watch either - more Hayes than Claxton - play much but Hayes and Claxton are almost identical in everything. Why is one projected to be a lottery player and the other a late first round pick in every mock draft?


hmm, Clax and Hayes are not really all that similar, Clax can stretch and shoot somewhat, while Hayes is a more traditional big with a bigger/stronger body.


Production wise they are similar players. Claxton is only one year older. Why is one considered a lottery talent and the other an end of the round talent?

People see Hayes as a future starting Center. I think people are seeing claxton as that perfect 1st big off the bench and not a starting center or a power forward



Both of these guys have grown a lot on me and I’m now seeing more value in them both. I think there’s a really sweet spot on big guys in this draft from 8 or 9 to about 20. Goga/Bolbol/kabegele and these 2 guys. I still think Goga or bolbol should be in consideration starting at 4
logical_art
RealGM
Posts: 11,095
And1: 3,672
Joined: May 14, 2001

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#51 » by logical_art » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:15 am

How much worse than Joakim Noah is Claxton?
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#52 » by nolang1 » Thu Jun 20, 2019 2:17 am

logical_art wrote:How much worse than Joakim Noah is Claxton?


Joakim Noah was the best player on the college national champions and a possible #1 pick in the draft after his sophomore season, so a lot.
logical_art
RealGM
Posts: 11,095
And1: 3,672
Joined: May 14, 2001

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#53 » by logical_art » Thu Jun 20, 2019 2:19 am

nolang1 wrote:
logical_art wrote:How much worse than Joakim Noah is Claxton?


Joakim Noah was the best player on the college national champions and a possible #1 pick in the draft after his sophomore season, so a lot.


I'm talking about at the pro level.
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#54 » by nolang1 » Thu Jun 20, 2019 2:21 am

logical_art wrote:
nolang1 wrote:
logical_art wrote:How much worse than Joakim Noah is Claxton?


Joakim Noah was the best player on the college national champions and a possible #1 pick in the draft after his sophomore season, so a lot.


I'm talking about at the pro level.


Joakim Noah was DPOY and made 1st team all-NBA, so a lot. Much better rebounding, strength, basketball IQ, passing, basically everything except shooting, where Claxton doesn't have much to hang his hat on either as a 61% free throw shooter and a 30% 3-point shooter.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 44,929
And1: 17,063
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#55 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Jun 21, 2019 11:31 am

Kilo wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:^That's too many invites.

He COULD be WAITING...FOR A LOOOOONG TIME.


League does their homework with the invitation lists. To add him a day before the draft - somebody went out of their way to get him there. His agent likely went to the league with something and then the league reached out to teams to see where they had him falling on their boards.



How long did Bol Bol have to wait to be drafted? 4 Hours!!!!!

It's unconscionable that the NBA set this kid up to be let down and embarrassed like this on national TV.

Invited to the green room...not even a 1st round pick.

:nonono:

While Bol drew focus early in the NBA draft for sporting a suit with a giant spiderweb emblazoned on it, the 7-foot-2 center became the most compelling prospect of the post-lottery picks, seemingly waiting forever in the green room to be selected.

Bol finally went with the No. 44 pick to the Nuggets (via the Heat), more than four hours after the draft begun.




Somebody needs to get their a** chewed out in his rep team and in the league office.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,531
And1: 4,030
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#56 » by EvanZ » Mon Jun 24, 2019 3:53 am

Jamaaliver wrote:
Somebody needs to get their a** chewed out in his rep team and in the league office.


From what I heard he was the first client his agent had. Guess there's a learning curve!
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,563
And1: 69,990
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#57 » by clyde21 » Mon Jun 24, 2019 4:54 am

EvanZ wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:
Somebody needs to get their a** chewed out in his rep team and in the league office.


From what I heard he was the first client his agent had. Guess there's a learning curve!


not sure how credible this is, but there was talk that teams dropped him because they 'didn't like his handlers', so that could part of the issue.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
Barnsey
Junior
Posts: 296
And1: 88
Joined: Jun 14, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#58 » by Barnsey » Sun Jun 30, 2019 3:57 am

Ben Rubin from The Stepien has quite a compelling case for Nic Claxton:

https://www.thestepien.com/2019/03/22/draft-notes-nic-claxton-first-evaluation-can-matter/

Thoughts?
Twitter: @Barnsketball
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,531
And1: 4,030
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Nic Claxton 

Post#59 » by EvanZ » Wed Mar 8, 2023 3:22 pm

EvanZ wrote:
Kalela wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
hmm, Clax and Hayes are not really all that similar, Clax can stretch and shoot somewhat, while Hayes is a more traditional big with a bigger/stronger body.


Production wise they are similar players. Claxton is only one year older. Why is one considered a lottery talent and the other an end of the round talent?


I dunno, they are 10 and 11 for me. 8-)


There's no debate at this point Claxton turned out to be the better player.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/

Return to NBA Draft