clyde21 wrote:BostonCouchGM wrote:BostonCouchGM wrote:
that's rich coming from you.
and also, it's not that Primo is a bad prospect, it's that there was way better still on the board and they could have taken him later after trading down and picking up more picks/assets. THAT's why it's the worst pick of the draft.
Interesting…
lol...u gonna puff your chest bc something completely unforseen happened with the kid off court?
nah, I'm going to take credit for being right. Feels good. You take an immature, youngest player in the draft, and you increase the likelihood of him never reaching his potential. It's a factor you have to consider in player evaluation. And it's not like he was some unbelievable talent. He had talent, sure. And good size. But we're talking about a kid who only put up 8-3 with less than an assist per game while shooting 43% from the field. SAS were once again trying to be the smartest guy in the room and took him much higher than he should have gone given what a high risk long shot he was. It just made no sense why they'd take an 18 y/o combo guard when they had Murray at PG and Vassell at SG. Along with Keldon Johnson they had the makings of a competitive team. If you want to take a project take one of the centers (Kai Jones, Sengun, Sims) that plays a position that isn't already locked down, giving them two big lineups with Poeltl, or a glue guy, 3 and D wing like Trey Murphy to play the 4. Just more Spurs nonsense but their apologists will never admit it. "but they're 5-2...show's how much you know!!"