mitchweber wrote:Dr Mufasa wrote:I agree... I'm more critical of the way teams (and fans) judge upside and natural talent, often putting too much emphasis on pure athleticism and not enough on skill or bball IQ. IMO James Harden's upside >>>>>>>> Demar Derozan's.
But yeah, a legit 7 footer with very good footwork and a midrange jumpshot definitely should not have been given a 'safe' label.
I don't know if I would go that far per se. I think the bigger problem is that people assume far too much certainty with regards to "upside". The truth is that if Joe Alexander does everything right, picks up a lot of skill, really gets the NBA game and realizes his full potential, he may be the better player than Lopez. But people fail to realize what a tall order that is.
Yea that's sort of what I mean. It isn't rare for players to learn to shoot once they hit the NBA, true. But handles, first step, passing vision and hands, bball IQ... for all of those, the players who have them, show it by their draft... it's very hard/impossible to go from horrible in those skills to superstar level after you hit the nba, or else everyone would be doing it. Well first step is a part of athleticism, but the fact that Derozan's isn't very good and Harden's is maybe means Derozan's athleticism is not as perfect as billed and Harden's is underrated. I think Harden's upside is bigger than Derozan because he does have a great first step, great handles, great shooting range, great passing skills, great bball IQ... all things that wing players must excel in to be stars. Meanwhile Derozan stinks at literally every one of those things. At some point there's just too much to just acquire out of nowhere once he hits the NBA because he's athletic. It's sort of like saying Thabeet's offensive ceiling is Kareem Abdul-Jabbar because he's 7'2+ and as mobile as him. Well that's not really untrue, but of course it's obvious Thabeet just doesn't have the skills in place to achieve that...