Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#441 » by ImHeisenberg » Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:24 pm

breakchains wrote:Just to answer the question posed in the thread title, not only is Wiggins not a lock to go #1, he's basically a lock not to go #1, as Embiid is on a different level than everyone else as a prospect.


Nothing boosts draft stock like a great showing in the tournament. He's not a lock to be #1, but nobody has locked up the #1 spot. That's pretentious and moronic to believe that.

Especially considering we have no idea who will be in the lottery, and what order it will fall. If the Kings, Pistons or 76ers get the top pick, they may very well pass over Embiid for somebody like Wiggins, Parker, Exum, Randle or Smart.

There's a lot of good prospects in this draft. I believe the draft order will be dictated by team needs, to some extent.
OrlChamps2030
General Manager
Posts: 8,035
And1: 4,336
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#442 » by OrlChamps2030 » Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:25 pm

Flight33 wrote:
breakchains wrote:Just to answer the question posed in the thread title, not only is Wiggins not a lock to go #1, he's basically a lock not to go #1, as Embiid is on a different level than everyone else as a prospect.


Tournament can change everything.


.. Like when Burke tore up the tourney and his draft stock plummeted?

.. Or when Marcus Smart **** the bed and was a lock to go #2??

And didn't Anthony Bennett have an unimpressive showing and get knocked out in the first round ( IIRC ) and ended up going #1??

Embiid is about as close as it gets to being a lock at #1
EricAnderson
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,774
And1: 2,245
Joined: May 28, 2008

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#443 » by EricAnderson » Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:36 pm

SlowPaced wrote:Wiggins hasn't been that good in college but I do think it's just fooling people at this point. NBA game fits Wiggins much better. Paul George's stats in his freshman year weren't much different.


WHile i agree hs games more suited for the pros dont see the freakish Dominiue Vince Carter like explosion/athletic ability that i saw on his hs higlights where it looked like this guy was a once a decade type talent when it looks like thats clearly not the case now..

Unless hes holding it back a ltitle in fear of injury?
User avatar
Nikos Beard
Junior
Posts: 435
And1: 380
Joined: Jul 11, 2013
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#444 » by Nikos Beard » Tue Jan 21, 2014 1:59 am

EricAnderson wrote:
SlowPaced wrote:Wiggins hasn't been that good in college but I do think it's just fooling people at this point. NBA game fits Wiggins much better. Paul George's stats in his freshman year weren't much different.


WHile i agree hs games more suited for the pros dont see the freakish Dominiue Vince Carter like explosion/athletic ability that i saw on his hs higlights where it looked like this guy was a once a decade type talent when it looks like thats clearly not the case now..

Unless hes holding it back a ltitle in fear of injury?


It's (lack of) confidence, not fear of injury. Under an offense that suits him better he'll be more comfortable doing the things we've seen him do in those high school highlight videos.
Okada
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,595
And1: 687
Joined: Dec 06, 2013
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#445 » by Okada » Tue Jan 21, 2014 4:20 am

I agree Embiid is a heavy favorite for #1 but yeah, all it takes to change that is one player having a big tournament and Embiid doesn't.
crazy_me_87
Analyst
Posts: 3,238
And1: 1,877
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#446 » by crazy_me_87 » Tue Jan 21, 2014 7:00 pm

bounced back with a nice 17/7 12 Ft attempts game

if Embiid stays another year like hes leaning towards right now..

and Wiggins maybe has a good showing at the Tournament

he could be still back in the 1 spot..

he has still the most raw talent and if Embiid does not declare.. its his spot again to loose

Parker could stay too... wow.. this draft could get depleted at the end
DoD_Magyar
Sophomore
Posts: 248
And1: 70
Joined: Nov 10, 2013

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#447 » by DoD_Magyar » Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:46 pm

crazy_me_87 wrote:bounced back with a nice 17/7 12 Ft attempts game

if Embiid stays another year like hes leaning towards right now..

and Wiggins maybe has a good showing at the Tournament

he could be still back in the 1 spot..

he has still the most raw talent and if Embiid does not declare.. its his spot again to loose

Parker could stay too... wow.. this draft could get depleted at the end


Exum also could stay too. Idk why but he talked with some collages. Without Parker, Embiid and Exum , this draft going to be trash.

By the way, Wiggins played good last night. 12 FT attempt looks good. But he needs FG mades also. I can't remember a game which Wiggins made at least 8-9 FG Made.
crazy_me_87
Analyst
Posts: 3,238
And1: 1,877
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#448 » by crazy_me_87 » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:56 pm

i agree with the "passive" argument

but i think its a little overblown

anthony davis was not seen as a second NBA year 20ppg scorer when he was in college

the system he played in just didnt let him dominate offensivly

i think its the same with Kansas.. Self plays a very balanced offense..

i agree he would benifit from more scoring output stock wise..

but he is shooting a solid 47% .. so the more scoring has to come from more touches and WIggins isnt the kind of kid wich will ask to shoot more... either Coach tells him or he wont hes a Team player
sikma42
Head Coach
Posts: 6,822
And1: 6,040
Joined: Nov 23, 2011

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#449 » by sikma42 » Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:05 am

crazy_me_87 wrote:i agree with the "passive" argument

but i think its a little overblown

anthony davis was not seen as a second NBA year 20ppg scorer when he was in college

the system he played in just didnt let him dominate offensivly

i think its the same with Kansas.. Self plays a very balanced offense..

i agree he would benifit from more scoring output stock wise..

but he is shooting a solid 47% .. so the more scoring has to come from more touches and WIggins isnt the kind of kid wich will ask to shoot more... either Coach tells him or he wont hes a Team player


Davis played on an overwhelming talented team. It wasn't the system, it was just that it was a balanced attack. And he wasn't that skilled in college, I honk he benefitted from playing in Kentucky because teams NEVER came their with the idea to just shut him down.

FYI...people were projecting Davis to be a 20 pig scorer. I also don't think too many people are surprised it happened early either.

Wiggins will be fine too. But it isn't just the system slowing him down, he has a skill deficiency and thinks he deserves superstar calls. Personally, I think he is a bit soft right now. Luckily, he will get more calls in the NBA and will have time to work on his skills.
Jazzfan12
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,294
And1: 213
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#450 » by Jazzfan12 » Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:05 am

Davis ORtg: 139
Wiggins ORtg: 113.6

That's larger than the difference between LeBron James and a random scrub in efficiency.
boateng
Banned User
Posts: 1,537
And1: 245
Joined: Oct 31, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#451 » by boateng » Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:54 pm

His stock has fallen no doubt

Before he was a cert to go number 1 whilst at this moment in time he could even fall out the top 3

I think Parker and Embiid will go before him then you have the likes of Exum, Randle and Smart that could be surprises.
Big_C_KU
Junior
Posts: 460
And1: 106
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#452 » by Big_C_KU » Sat Jan 25, 2014 4:27 pm

boateng wrote:His stock has fallen no doubt

Before he was a cert to go number 1 whilst at this moment in time he could even fall out the top 3

I think Parker and Embiid will go before him then you have the likes of Exum, Randle and Smart that could be surprises.


It seems that Wiggins is sitting strongly at #2 in most mocks. Mostly to do with the fact that if Parker isn't scoring he doesn't have much effect on the game while Wiggins effects games in other areas than just scoring. That's become noticeable since conference play began.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Golabki
General Manager
Posts: 8,400
And1: 1,112
Joined: Jan 31, 2005

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#453 » by Golabki » Sat Jan 25, 2014 4:37 pm

Big_C_KU wrote:
boateng wrote:His stock has fallen no doubt

Before he was a cert to go number 1 whilst at this moment in time he could even fall out the top 3

I think Parker and Embiid will go before him then you have the likes of Exum, Randle and Smart that could be surprises.


It seems that Wiggins is sitting strongly at #2 in most mocks. Mostly to do with the fact that if Parker isn't scoring he doesn't have much effect on the game while Wiggins effects games in other areas than just scoring. That's become noticeable since conference play began.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using RealGM Forums mobile app

I'm a big believer in drafting the guys that dominate the NCAA at an earlier age.

Physically, Wiggins is a prototype SF for the NBA, so he gets bonus point for that, but his level of play just put him #1 or in the top 3.
DoD_Magyar
Sophomore
Posts: 248
And1: 70
Joined: Nov 10, 2013

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#454 » by DoD_Magyar » Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:14 am

Wiggins with 19 pts in first half at TCU.

Kid is playing great today.
Tave
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,356
And1: 1,356
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#455 » by Tave » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:27 am

He looked really good tonight, and TCU's offense did everything it could to beat him up on picks and make him chase shooters. Kid will be a nightmare on both ends when he fills out.
Hogified05
Rookie
Posts: 1,149
And1: 506
Joined: Jul 09, 2010
Location: Florida
Contact:
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#456 » by Hogified05 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:21 pm

Two things that he will need to improve to become the player we all think he can be. His assertiveness, which will improve when an NBA team says it's on you to score, plus he doesn't have to be dominate with this Kansas team. Then his ball handling. He just dribbles it to high, he gets too loose with it to much. Once he tightens that up he will be a superstar.

I think most people were worried about his shot, but he shoots it fine. He is starting to find his stroke and over the last few games he was shooting like 80 some percent from the line. It's also a plus that he is getting to the line alot. That's the sign of a good scorer.

For me Embiid is number one because 7 foot centers with his skill set are so hard to find. But Wiggins is solid number 2 for me right now. Followed by Parker and Randle. This draft more then any in recent memory will rely on the order the teams pick where the players get picked.
The hero Orlando deserves is out there somewhere, Dwight was not the one we needed. So we will hunt for him...
bigboi
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,648
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 05, 2010

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#457 » by bigboi » Sun Jan 26, 2014 8:42 pm

It's simple as this. Wiggins is dominant when teams play man to man, but when he is facing zone he sucks. That's why his stats aren't higher, teams have been playing a lot of zone on Kansas
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.

Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
sikma42
Head Coach
Posts: 6,822
And1: 6,040
Joined: Nov 23, 2011

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#458 » by sikma42 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:27 pm

bigboi wrote:It's simple as this. Wiggins is dominant when teams play man to man, but when he is facing zone he sucks. That's why his stats aren't higher, teams have been playing a lot of zone on Kansas

I really think we throw around the word dominant a little too much.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,172
And1: 15,037
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#459 » by 165bows » Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:25 am

sikma42 wrote:
bigboi wrote:It's simple as this. Wiggins is dominant when teams play man to man, but when he is facing zone he sucks. That's why his stats aren't higher, teams have been playing a lot of zone on Kansas

I really think we throw around the word dominant a little too much.


I think the word dominate gets thrown around too much when people really mean dominant.
User avatar
beans-boy
Sophomore
Posts: 175
And1: 69
Joined: Jan 18, 2013

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#460 » by beans-boy » Mon Jan 27, 2014 6:34 pm

Ya'll complete trippers!

Once scouts see Exums 1st step in workouts he will climb to number two! It's elite.. ELITE. He will get to the line at will...

A Kobe/Penny hybrid beats out a T-Mac or Truth hybrid everyday of the week..

Dis boy done some nassty things..

Return to NBA Draft