clyde21 wrote:^ no one is saying he's a bust
. That's a the draw. Low bust potential.
clyde21 wrote: and no one is claiming he has to be Anthony Davis,
Good. That would be a rediculously high standard to have for a top 3 pick in a draft that most people view as weak at the top.
clyde21 wrote:but if you're talking about a top 3 or top 5 CENTER in today's NBA...you HAVE to be a multi-level player, you just have to be
Who's saying he is going to be a top 3 or top 5 center in the NBA? If he can be on the Nurkic, Adams, Capella, Favors, Vuch, Drummond, Turner tier that would be excellent value for a top pick in what is percieved as a weak draft.
clyde21 wrote:and when the majority of his offense is gonna come on catching and put-backs, he needs ELITE hands, which I'm not sure he has at this point...
yea, nothing is set in stone, he's still super young with a lot of developement ahead,
Imo opinion you answered yourself there.
clyde21 wrote:but he's being graded as a top pick in the draft, these things matter
So Wiseman needs to be top 5 or 6 at his position and be a "multilevel" player, top be worthy of a top 5 pick? Well you have Scottie Lewis and RJ Hampton at the top of your board does the standard stay the same for them? Do they have to be top 5 at their position to be drafted top 5? You have to grade on a curve, Zion/Luka/Ayton aren't in this draft.
But I'm talking to a guy with RJ Hampton #1 and Scottie Lewis #4.
This is a lesson I learned last year, if you have a guy ranked higher than everyone else, you BETTER be right, because odds are, if your higher on him than everyone else you'll be the one to draft him. Last year I missed on my #7 ranked player, that means if I stay true to my big board, any pick after #9 (my last top 6 pick went #9) I would've missed.
If you have Anthony Bennet #1 on your big board and Giannis #2, you still end up with Anthony Bennet. If you have Kendall Marshall #12 on your big board and Draymond Green #13, it doesn't matter, because you end up picking Kendall Marshall.
Last year you had Bol Bol #2, that means if you stayed true to your big board your team would've 100% ended up with Bol Bol. I know your a proponent of trading down, but what if you can't trade down? Then do you pick Bol Bol #2? Or do you deviate from your big board? What's the point of having a player #2 on your big board if he's available a #2 and #1 goes #1, but you don't pick the player you ranked #2 at #2? You'll probably say "I would've traded down" what if you get bad offers to trade down? And are you really going to trade down more than 5 picks or so? What if somebody staels your #2 pick?
At the top of the draft you need to be 100% safe.
And just like the first sentence I quoted you in, "no one is saying Wiseman will bust" combine that with him being extremely athletic (for his massive size) him being the top ranked HS player in the country his senior year and him posted a 19/11 on 73% shooting and only in 20mpg, while player OVERALL extremely impressive defense (compared to other college players not compared to NBA veterans, although obviously we would expect him, like most top prospects to get more fundamental with age, and consistency on his fundamentals is his only real weakness defensively)