Stillwater wrote:shakes0 wrote:Stillwater wrote:The point is the averages are regular season there buddy..
you sure about that Stillwater?
If it isn't I will stand corrected but it is.
Consider yourself corrected.
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus
Stillwater wrote:shakes0 wrote:Stillwater wrote:The point is the averages are regular season there buddy..
you sure about that Stillwater?
If it isn't I will stand corrected but it is.
shakes0 wrote:Stillwater wrote:shakes0 wrote:
you sure about that Stillwater?
If it isn't I will stand corrected but it is.
sorry if the clue I gave you earlier wasn't strong enough, but to put it simply you are wrong. College stats are for all games played including conference and NCAA tournaments.
Consider yourself corrected.
Stillwater wrote:shakes0 wrote:Stillwater wrote:If it isn't I will stand corrected but it is.
sorry if the clue I gave you earlier wasn't strong enough, but to put it simply you are wrong. College stats are for all games played including conference and NCAA tournaments.
Consider yourself corrected.
Interesting...doesnt change my point that much though does it. Mitchell is a legit NBA prospect in the same mold as these other all star caliber nba guards and whether he reaches their level in the league is yet to be determined but the skill is there its obvious
EMG518 wrote:Stillwater wrote:shakes0 wrote:
sorry if the clue I gave you earlier wasn't strong enough, but to put it simply you are wrong. College stats are for all games played including conference and NCAA tournaments.
Consider yourself corrected.
Interesting...doesnt change my point that much though does it. Mitchell is a legit NBA prospect in the same mold as these other all star caliber nba guards and whether he reaches their level in the league is yet to be determined but the skill is there its obvious
Your evaluation is just really off base. If he makes the league and gets in a rotation that would be an accomplishment.
bs there is no reason at all other than his age to lower my opinion on his draft stock. Nothing tells me he will fail at the next level the 2 way player I am talking about is going to be a stud. This is not some prospect that was overlooked based on anything but needing to improve as a player which he has. His athleticism and current skill set is easily above average NBA starting Guard material . He is not on radars of typical mid to high lottery teams that are entering long rebuilds and have a lot of time to develop etc and that require years of tanking and asset accumulation but anyone else will see a win now guard worth taking anywhere from 7-14.Stillwater wrote:EMG518 wrote:Stillwater wrote:Interesting...doesnt change my point that much though does it. Mitchell is a legit NBA prospect in the same mold as these other all star caliber nba guards and whether he reaches their level in the league is yet to be determined but the skill is there its obvious
Your evaluation is just really off base. If he makes the league and gets in a rotation that would be an accomplishment.
bs there is no reason at all other than his age to lower my opinion on his draft stock. Nothing tells me he will fail at the next level the 2 way player I am talking about is going to be a stud. This is not some prospect that was overlooked based on anything but needing to improve as a player which he has. His athleticism and current skill set is easily above average NBA starting Guard material . He is not on radars of typical mid to high lottery teams that are entering long rebuilds and have a lot of time to develop etc and that require years of tanking and asset accumulation but anyone else will see a win now guard worth taking anywhere from 7-14.
If he goes after that then the NBA scouting system is broken
Stillwater wrote:EMG518 wrote:Stillwater wrote:Interesting...doesnt change my point that much though does it. Mitchell is a legit NBA prospect in the same mold as these other all star caliber nba guards and whether he reaches their level in the league is yet to be determined but the skill is there its obvious
His athleticism and current skill set is easily above average NBA starting Guard material

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
CptCrunch wrote:Stillwater wrote:EMG518 wrote:
His athleticism and current skill set is easily above average NBA starting Guard material
This is frankly nuts, have you look at the #15 PG and/or SG based on RPM/BPM or even scoring to see how good they are?
This is a Westbrook, Brogdon, Trae, Booker, Beal, Ingles kind of player. Solidly middle of the pack starting players at guard. And you claim Davion is 'solidly above average' which implies he should be even better.
By your scouting, I don't see how Davion is not a top 3 lock, and has a strong case for #1.
Brofessor24 wrote:IMO these players are overrated: Davion Mitchell, Isaiah Jackson, Scottie Barnes, Day'Ron Sharpe, and Keon Johnson.
These players are underrated: Isaiah Todd, Josh Christopher, Cameron Thomas, Jalen Johnson, and Nah'Shon Hyland.
SmoothLefty21 wrote:Moses Moody for sure. He's 6'6" and can shoot, that's about it. He's fine after the lottery, or at the very end of it, but people who have him at #6 are insane.
predators wrote:SmoothLefty21 wrote:Moses Moody for sure. He's 6'6" and can shoot, that's about it. He's fine after the lottery, or at the very end of it, but people who have him at #6 are insane.
Not all 6'6" is the same. There aren't very many athletic 6'6" guys with 7'1" wingspan players that can also shoot. The 7'1" wingspan part is kind of important.

Stillwater wrote:predators wrote:SmoothLefty21 wrote:Moses Moody for sure. He's 6'6" and can shoot, that's about it. He's fine after the lottery, or at the very end of it, but people who have him at #6 are insane.
Not all 6'6" is the same. There aren't very many athletic 6'6" guys with 7'1" wingspan players that can also shoot. The 7'1" wingspan part is kind of important.
Is'nt the knock on Moody that he is not aggressive enough in his approach to the game so far aka not an alpha ? I don't think anyone is drafted in the lottery anymore based on anthro alone.
Catchall wrote:Jalen Johnson can't shoot, so I'm not sure what that makes him--a defensive specialist like Bradon Clarke? Is his on-ball creation going to be so good that he plays like Ben Simmons?
Hal14 wrote:Catchall wrote:Jalen Johnson can't shoot, so I'm not sure what that makes him--a defensive specialist like Bradon Clarke? Is his on-ball creation going to be so good that he plays like Ben Simmons?
53.8% from 2 point range and 44.4% from 3 but he can't shoot?
predators wrote:Stillwater wrote:predators wrote:
Not all 6'6" is the same. There aren't very many athletic 6'6" guys with 7'1" wingspan players that can also shoot. The 7'1" wingspan part is kind of important.
Is'nt the knock on Moody that he is not aggressive enough in his approach to the game so far aka not an alpha ? I don't think anyone is drafted in the lottery anymore based on anthro alone.
It's not like he had Nassir Little or Kelly Oubre college career. He was the leading scorer on his team as freshmen (With decent efficiency) and took them to the tourney. He was productive and big. Big productive players are usually pretty good in the NBA.