Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 34,870
And1: 17,373
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Occupied Los Angeles
     

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#61 » by babyjax13 » Wed Feb 1, 2023 6:23 pm

Hal14 wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:If the Thompson twins don't develop passable jumpers they are bench players at best. Other players have been extreme outlier athletes while not being anything but bench guys in the NBA, e.g. Gerald Green, Shannon Brown, etc. They have some nice passing ability, but every time I've seen them Ausar has been passive to a fault and can't punish defenses for going under screens or switching, and Amen presses to generate rim pressure but that advantage can been mitigated because he can't shoot, either. Based on their lack of development in their most important swing skill, I can't see how anyone would have confidence in OTEs development program. Ollie might be a good game manager, and I love Mike Miller, but either the program can't identify what players need for the NBA, can't help them develop those skills, or there is something fundamentally wrong with how the twins do and/or have approached the game.

They literally just turned 20. Stop expecting them to be amazing shooters. Most of the league's best shooters are guys who are age 26 or older.

Ausar has improved his 3 pt % this season dramatically.

Also, remember that 3 pt % is not everything. It's actually pretty low on the list of indicators to look for when projecting 3 pt shooting ability long term at the NBA level.

Volume is a big indicator and both of the twins are shooting good volume from 3 and on long 2's. They'll be fine and they project as arguably the 2 best defensive prospects in this draft class, arguably the 2 best passing prospects in this class, arguably the 2 best prospects in the class in terms of rim pressure while being generational prospects in terms of athleticism.

Both of them have terrible forms. Amen shoots 66% from the line and Ausar shoots 67%, so I'm not sure what about them is supposed to suggest that they can shoot. They have ability and athleticism that paired with some actual development could result in star players, but you are acting like pointing out their shortcomings is some kind of misrepresentation of who they are as players. If we can't judge them by what we see or their statistical profiles, what is there? Highlights? Like, it's cute that sometimes they blow by a bunch of defenders and finish over some high school guys, but that schtick won't work as well in the NBA if it isn't paired with other developments in their game. Right now they are are projected to be both the oldest, and least developed players in the lottery. I mean, look at this ****, they still can't shoot and this is what it looked like when they were preparing for this season. Does anything in this video give you confidence they'll be passable shooters any time soon?

;si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE

I'm not saying they won't or can't develop, like everyone else, I am pointing out that there are some major issues in their game that are really important for their future development. Right now Amen is absolute **** as a shooter, and Ausar is improving but still not good (from threes: Amen 23%, Ausar 32%).
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
SeattleJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,324
And1: 2,710
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#62 » by SeattleJazzFan » Wed Feb 1, 2023 7:18 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
SeattleJazzFan wrote:if dillon mitchell had played in OTE, yeah, chances are very good he'd be in the top 7 discussion. if you're an elite athlete who can't shoot, go play OTE - even g league - anywhere with a more wide open, up and down style. college basketball is too crowded and it's tough for a guy like that to get production.

I have to say I disagree. I had him as a second rounder based on high school. It was clear even in that context he was big, not skilled. Maybe I was an outlier, but I think watching a few games he would have been moved down a lot.


iirc, most had him top 10. but i'm old and forgetful so i could be way off as well.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 34,870
And1: 17,373
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Occupied Los Angeles
     

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#63 » by babyjax13 » Wed Feb 1, 2023 7:22 pm

SeattleJazzFan wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
SeattleJazzFan wrote:if dillon mitchell had played in OTE, yeah, chances are very good he'd be in the top 7 discussion. if you're an elite athlete who can't shoot, go play OTE - even g league - anywhere with a more wide open, up and down style. college basketball is too crowded and it's tough for a guy like that to get production.

I have to say I disagree. I had him as a second rounder based on high school. It was clear even in that context he was big, not skilled. Maybe I was an outlier, but I think watching a few games he would have been moved down a lot.


iirc, most had him top 10. but i'm old and forgetful so i could be way off as well.

They did, but I think he would have been exposed at any elevated level of play. OTE has some guys that are big and athletic, and would have exposed that against better competition he just kind of...sucks. But college is also a much better proving ground. Mitchell could still improve, the shotmaking could be what people hoped and then he looks more interesting.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,573
And1: 69,999
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#64 » by clyde21 » Wed Feb 1, 2023 7:36 pm

i had Dillon Mitchell top10 coming in, before he showed ZERO development in terms of on-ball skills and shooting, but yea there is no doubt OTE is much more tailored for these types of guys vs. college.

that said Ausar/Amen are clearly more skilled than Dillon at this point.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 21,493
And1: 20,054
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#65 » by Hal14 » Wed Feb 1, 2023 9:15 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:If the Thompson twins don't develop passable jumpers they are bench players at best. Other players have been extreme outlier athletes while not being anything but bench guys in the NBA, e.g. Gerald Green, Shannon Brown, etc. They have some nice passing ability, but every time I've seen them Ausar has been passive to a fault and can't punish defenses for going under screens or switching, and Amen presses to generate rim pressure but that advantage can been mitigated because he can't shoot, either. Based on their lack of development in their most important swing skill, I can't see how anyone would have confidence in OTEs development program. Ollie might be a good game manager, and I love Mike Miller, but either the program can't identify what players need for the NBA, can't help them develop those skills, or there is something fundamentally wrong with how the twins do and/or have approached the game.

They literally just turned 20. Stop expecting them to be amazing shooters. Most of the league's best shooters are guys who are age 26 or older.

Ausar has improved his 3 pt % this season dramatically.

Also, remember that 3 pt % is not everything. It's actually pretty low on the list of indicators to look for when projecting 3 pt shooting ability long term at the NBA level.

Volume is a big indicator and both of the twins are shooting good volume from 3 and on long 2's. They'll be fine and they project as arguably the 2 best defensive prospects in this draft class, arguably the 2 best passing prospects in this class, arguably the 2 best prospects in the class in terms of rim pressure while being generational prospects in terms of athleticism.

Both of them have terrible forms. Amen shoots 66% from the line and Ausar shoots 67%, so I'm not sure what about them is supposed to suggest that they can shoot. They have ability and athleticism that paired with some actual development could result in star players, but you are acting like pointing out their shortcomings is some kind of misrepresentation of who they are as players. If we can't judge them by what we see or their statistical profiles, what is there? Highlights? Like, it's cute that sometimes they blow by a bunch of defenders and finish over some high school guys, but that schtick won't work as well in the NBA if it isn't paired with other developments in their game. Right now they are are projected to be both the oldest, and least developed players in the lottery. I mean, look at this ****, they still can't shoot and this is what it looked like when they were preparing for this season. Does anything in this video give you confidence they'll be passable shooters any time soon?

;si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE

I'm not saying they won't or can't develop, like everyone else, I am pointing out that there are some major issues in their game that are really important for their future development. Right now Amen is absolute **** as a shooter, and Ausar is improving but still not good (from threes: Amen 23%, Ausar 32%).

Volume is a good indicator, like I just mentioned in my previous post. Let's look at volume of 3PA per 40 mins:

Ousmane Dieng 8.0 (but his FT% and 3 PT% are very similar to the twins)
Dariq Whitehead 7.3 (big injury red flags)
Nick Smith Jr. 6.7 (big injury red flags)
GG Jackson 6.6
Jaden Ivey 6.3
Keegan Murray 5.9
Cason Wallace 5.8
Ausar Thompson 5.7
Maxwell Lewis 5.5
Franz Wagner 4.6
Amen Thompson 4.4
Josh Giddey 4.4
Dyson Daniels 4.3
Jeremy Sochan 4.3
Paolo Banchero 4.0
Jalen Williams 3.7
Scoot Henderson 3.3
Anthony Black 3.2
Jarace Walker 3.0
Scottie Barnes 2.7

When you look at the combination of 3Pt%, 3PA per 40 mins and FT% together, the Thompson's are in similar territory as Banchero, Sochan, Daniels, Anthony Black, GG Jackson, Ousmane Dieng, Josh Giddey, Franz Wagner, Scottie Barnes and Jarace Walker. So why are people on here being such sticklers with the Thomson twins' shooting? Where was that same energy with these other guys?

That's 19 players. All of them either went lottery or have a strong chance of going lottery this year. Out of the 19 players, Ausar is 8th in volume and Amen is 11th. So they're middle of the pack.

Then you have a few guys in this year's class with crazy high volume (Keyonte, Jett, Whitmore, Brandon Miller, Sensabaugh). But Jett, Keyonte, Sensabaugh and Miller all have similar flaws - not very good athleticism, not good burst off the dribble to get to the rim, not great finishing at the rim, not great handle, not great defenders, not elite passers. These guys are obviously all better shooting prospects than the twins, but the twins crush them in all of those other areas (athleticism, burst, rim pressure, defense, passing, ability to rise up over a defender at the rim). Then you have Whitmore, who does have really good athleticism, but is not a good defender, really low passing feel, can only drive in straight lines..)

Whitehead (in addition to injury red flags) has really just been a supporting piece at Duke so it's hard to project the type of star upside that the Thompsons have. The injuries have taken away a lot of Whitehead's athleticism (perhaps the athleticism comes back over time as he gets healthier but that's no guarantee), his handle was the weakest part of his game prior to the injuries, his defense is good but not nearly on the twins level (his D has also gotten worse at Duke post-injury than it was at Monterve), his passing feel is average at best.

In the similar boat as some of these guys I just mentioned in the "good shooters but not great at anything else" bucket is Jabari Smith. Similar deal. Couldn't dribble, couldn't get to the rim, low number of dunks, low FG% at the rim, high % of his rim attempts that got blocked, very good defender but very low feel passer, not great athleticism. But now in the NBA he is only shooting 30% from 3. That's the danger when you draft a guy and so much of his value as a prospect is tied to his shooting. If the shots aren't falling, then it's hard for that player to be a positive contributor. Same thing happened with Aaron Nesmith - he got drafted lottery and is was mostly tied to his shooting. But then the shots weren't falling as much in the NBA and then he gets benched.

Bottom line:

1) The twins shooting profile isn't as bleak as you guys think when you consider volume - and compare that volume to other prospects from the past couple years.

2) If you only look at shooting, sure, maybe you have them in the 13-16 range. But if that's the case, then you would also have Anthony Black, Josh Giddey, Scottie Barnes, GG Jackson, Jeremy Sochan, Dyson Daniels and Jarace Walker in that range.

3) Looking at only shooting is a big mistake. Like I said, guys like George, Whitehead, Miller, Sensabaugh, Howard and Whitmore project as better shooters, but the twins are better in basically every other area (most areas the twins are MUCH better than these guys). And shooting is the easiest thing to improve on once you're in the league.

Lastly, another indicator for shooting projection is volume and % of 2 point jumpers. I don't have stats on this or a whole breakdown comparing them to the other guys listed above, but if you've watched a good chunk of OTE games you'd know that the twins do take a good volume of 2 pt jumpers (because opposing defenses pack it into the paint to try and force them to take jumpers) and while their % of making 2 pt jumpers (I don't think) is great, they do make at least some of them here and there which is a good sign - especially where lots of the other guys mentioned in this post (Barnes, Sochan, Jarace Walker, Brandon Miller, Giddey, Keyonte, Whitmore, etc.) do not take (or make) very many 2 pt jumpers at all..
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 34,870
And1: 17,373
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Occupied Los Angeles
     

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#66 » by babyjax13 » Wed Feb 1, 2023 10:13 pm

Hal14 wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:They literally just turned 20. Stop expecting them to be amazing shooters. Most of the league's best shooters are guys who are age 26 or older.

Ausar has improved his 3 pt % this season dramatically.

Also, remember that 3 pt % is not everything. It's actually pretty low on the list of indicators to look for when projecting 3 pt shooting ability long term at the NBA level.

Volume is a big indicator and both of the twins are shooting good volume from 3 and on long 2's. They'll be fine and they project as arguably the 2 best defensive prospects in this draft class, arguably the 2 best passing prospects in this class, arguably the 2 best prospects in the class in terms of rim pressure while being generational prospects in terms of athleticism.

Both of them have terrible forms. Amen shoots 66% from the line and Ausar shoots 67%, so I'm not sure what about them is supposed to suggest that they can shoot. They have ability and athleticism that paired with some actual development could result in star players, but you are acting like pointing out their shortcomings is some kind of misrepresentation of who they are as players. If we can't judge them by what we see or their statistical profiles, what is there? Highlights? Like, it's cute that sometimes they blow by a bunch of defenders and finish over some high school guys, but that schtick won't work as well in the NBA if it isn't paired with other developments in their game. Right now they are are projected to be both the oldest, and least developed players in the lottery. I mean, look at this ****, they still can't shoot and this is what it looked like when they were preparing for this season. Does anything in this video give you confidence they'll be passable shooters any time soon?

;si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE

I'm not saying they won't or can't develop, like everyone else, I am pointing out that there are some major issues in their game that are really important for their future development. Right now Amen is absolute **** as a shooter, and Ausar is improving but still not good (from threes: Amen 23%, Ausar 32%).

Volume is a good indicator, like I just mentioned in my previous post. Let's look at volume of 3PA per 40 mins:

Ousmane Dieng 8.0 (but his FT% and 3 PT% are very similar to the twins)
Dariq Whitehead 7.3 (big injury red flags)
Nick Smith Jr. 6.7 (big injury red flags)
GG Jackson 6.6
Jaden Ivey 6.3
Keegan Murray 5.9
Cason Wallace 5.8
Ausar Thompson 5.7
Maxwell Lewis 5.5
Franz Wagner 4.6
Amen Thompson 4.4
Josh Giddey 4.4
Dyson Daniels 4.3
Jeremy Sochan 4.3
Paolo Banchero 4.0
Jalen Williams 3.7
Scoot Henderson 3.3
Anthony Black 3.2
Jarace Walker 3.0
Scottie Barnes 2.7

When you look at the combination of 3Pt%, 3PA per 40 mins and FT% together, the Thompson's are in similar territory as Banchero, Sochan, Daniels, Anthony Black, GG Jackson, Ousmane Dieng, Josh Giddey, Franz Wagner, Scottie Barnes and Jarace Walker. So why are people on here being such sticklers with the Thomson twins' shooting? Where was that same energy with these other guys?

That's 19 players. All of them either went lottery or have a strong chance of going lottery this year. Out of the 19 players, Ausar is 8th in volume and Amen is 11th. So they're middle of the pack.

Then you have a few guys in this year's class with crazy high volume (Keyonte, Jett, Whitmore, Brandon Miller, Sensabaugh). But Jett, Keyonte, Sensabaugh and Miller all have similar flaws - not very good athleticism, not good burst off the dribble to get to the rim, not great finishing at the rim, not great handle, not great defenders, not elite passers. These guys are obviously all better shooting prospects than the twins, but the twins crush them in all of those other areas (athleticism, burst, rim pressure, defense, passing, ability to rise up over a defender at the rim). Then you have Whitmore, who does have really good athleticism, but is not a good defender, really low passing feel, can only drive in straight lines..)

Whitehead (in addition to injury red flags) has really just been a supporting piece at Duke so it's hard to project the type of star upside that the Thompsons have. The injuries have taken away a lot of Whitehead's athleticism (perhaps the athleticism comes back over time as he gets healthier but that's no guarantee), his handle was the weakest part of his game prior to the injuries, his defense is good but not nearly on the twins level (his D has also gotten worse at Duke post-injury than it was at Monterve), his passing feel is average at best.

In the similar boat as some of these guys I just mentioned in the "good shooters but not great at anything else" bucket is Jabari Smith. Similar deal. Couldn't dribble, couldn't get to the rim, low number of dunks, low FG% at the rim, high % of his rim attempts that got blocked, very good defender but very low feel passer, not great athleticism. But now in the NBA he is only shooting 30% from 3. That's the danger when you draft a guy and so much of his value as a prospect is tied to his shooting. If the shots aren't falling, then it's hard for that player to be a positive contributor. Same thing happened with Aaron Nesmith - he got drafted lottery and is was mostly tied to his shooting. But then the shots weren't falling as much in the NBA and then he gets benched.

Bottom line:

1) The twins shooting profile isn't as bleak as you guys think when you consider volume - and compare that volume to other prospects from the past couple years.

2) If you only look at shooting, sure, maybe you have them in the 13-16 range. But if that's the case, then you would also have Anthony Black, Josh Giddey, Scottie Barnes, GG Jackson, Jeremy Sochan, Dyson Daniels and Jarace Walker in that range.

3) Looking at only shooting is a big mistake. Like I said, guys like George, Whitehead, Miller, Sensabaugh, Howard and Whitmore project as better shooters, but the twins are better in basically every other area (most areas the twins are MUCH better than these guys). And shooting is the easiest thing to improve on once you're in the league.

Lastly, another indicator for shooting projection is volume and % of 2 point jumpers. I don't have stats on this or a whole breakdown comparing them to the other guys listed above, but if you've watched a good chunk of OTE games you'd know that the twins do take a good volume of 2 pt jumpers (because opposing defenses pack it into the paint to try and force them to take jumpers) and while their % of making 2 pt jumpers (I don't think) is great, they do make at least some of them here and there which is a good sign - especially where lots of the other guys mentioned in this post (Barnes, Sochan, Jarace Walker, Brandon Miller, Giddey, Keyonte, Whitmore, etc.) do not take (or make) very many 2 pt jumpers at all..


(1) volume + 3PT% + FT% using some of your comparable players already in the NBA + Black because he is mocked in a similar area:
Banchero
3/34%/74%
Just not comparable percentages to Amen, and still quite a bit better than Ausar. Also a big, so spacing the court is much less of a swing skill, just needed to develop a bit to keep defenses honest. Still shooting 32% from 3 in the NBA.

Sochan
3/29%/59%
The question for Sochan was shooting, he has completely revamped his stroke, people were more comfortable with him b/c he was a big, so while shooting was a swing skill he could still carve out a role without it. Still shooting 27% from 3, so it is not clear he can shoot. Seems like a poor example thus far.

Daniels
3.6/26%/74%
The question for Daniels was shooting. He is shooting 31% from 3 in the NBA, but did exhibit development in the gleague in that regard. It's still not clear he is going to be an average or plus shooter, it is still the swing skill that will determine his future role in the NBA. FT% much better than both twins.

Wagner
3.6 attempts/34.5%/84%
Clearly not comparable to the Thompson twins in terms of percentages.

Black
3/32%/72%
Shooting is the clear swing skill. Percentages are much better than Amen, similar to Ausar (FT% a bit better).

I will say that I have more confidence in Ausar because his percentages are not as atrocious, but you mainly cited some mid/late lottery players, and the ones for whom shooting was a swing skill still have not become + shooters in the NBA. Out of the guys you mentioned I think the only + shooter of the group is Franz. So I don't see a convincing argument here at all. I also think you are straw manning a bit, most people recognized a lot of these guys needed to work on their shooting - and the ones for whom that was not the case, were just not comparable to Amen/Ausar (esp. Amen).

We are also talking about where the twins should go, I am not sure they should be in that 3-6 range, and my impression is that you think they should be. If that's the case, it's also not totally relevant that guys mocked far after them (i.e. that we can recognize there are more questions or lower upside) have bigger questions. I'll fully admit that if, say, Amen learns to shoot at 36% from 3 in the league on good volume that he could easily be the second or third best prospect in this class, barring injuries for he and other players.

(2) other guys also couldn't shoot
That point matters, IMO, most with guards and wings in the same draft range. I didn't have Giddey in the conversation for third, I didn't have Daniels there, I don't have Walker there, and I agree that Black's shooting is likely going to be bad enough that he shouldn't be there, either. But I do think all those guys were reasonable picks in the 5-12 range, and that's were the twins should be.

(3) other guys have different questions (athleticism)

Sure, not sure how that is relevant. No one is saying that other prospects don't have their own issues. The point is that the twins are older than most of the other lottery prospects, while not exhibiting much development on their swing skill. The other guys may live or die in terms of being stars vs. roleplayers based on their athleticism. Most of the guys you are talking about though just are not going to go top 5-7, so outside of George and Whitmore, I don't see the point (and I don't think the Twins are more developed than George in almost any way; they are athletes with some court vision and in that regard are more developed, but George is a bonafide scorer who isn't selfish --- that pretty easily translates, I'm not sure pnr/drivers who can't shoot translates as easily). Some guys I disagree with your assessment on in terms of their place physically in the league, but that doesn't change the overall point.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 21,493
And1: 20,054
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#67 » by Hal14 » Wed Feb 1, 2023 11:17 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Both of them have terrible forms. Amen shoots 66% from the line and Ausar shoots 67%, so I'm not sure what about them is supposed to suggest that they can shoot. They have ability and athleticism that paired with some actual development could result in star players, but you are acting like pointing out their shortcomings is some kind of misrepresentation of who they are as players. If we can't judge them by what we see or their statistical profiles, what is there? Highlights? Like, it's cute that sometimes they blow by a bunch of defenders and finish over some high school guys, but that schtick won't work as well in the NBA if it isn't paired with other developments in their game. Right now they are are projected to be both the oldest, and least developed players in the lottery. I mean, look at this ****, they still can't shoot and this is what it looked like when they were preparing for this season. Does anything in this video give you confidence they'll be passable shooters any time soon?

;si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE

I'm not saying they won't or can't develop, like everyone else, I am pointing out that there are some major issues in their game that are really important for their future development. Right now Amen is absolute **** as a shooter, and Ausar is improving but still not good (from threes: Amen 23%, Ausar 32%).

Volume is a good indicator, like I just mentioned in my previous post. Let's look at volume of 3PA per 40 mins:

Ousmane Dieng 8.0 (but his FT% and 3 PT% are very similar to the twins)
Dariq Whitehead 7.3 (big injury red flags)
Nick Smith Jr. 6.7 (big injury red flags)
GG Jackson 6.6
Jaden Ivey 6.3
Keegan Murray 5.9
Cason Wallace 5.8
Ausar Thompson 5.7
Maxwell Lewis 5.5
Franz Wagner 4.6
Amen Thompson 4.4
Josh Giddey 4.4
Dyson Daniels 4.3
Jeremy Sochan 4.3
Paolo Banchero 4.0
Jalen Williams 3.7
Scoot Henderson 3.3
Anthony Black 3.2
Jarace Walker 3.0
Scottie Barnes 2.7

When you look at the combination of 3Pt%, 3PA per 40 mins and FT% together, the Thompson's are in similar territory as Banchero, Sochan, Daniels, Anthony Black, GG Jackson, Ousmane Dieng, Josh Giddey, Franz Wagner, Scottie Barnes and Jarace Walker. So why are people on here being such sticklers with the Thomson twins' shooting? Where was that same energy with these other guys?

That's 19 players. All of them either went lottery or have a strong chance of going lottery this year. Out of the 19 players, Ausar is 8th in volume and Amen is 11th. So they're middle of the pack.

Then you have a few guys in this year's class with crazy high volume (Keyonte, Jett, Whitmore, Brandon Miller, Sensabaugh). But Jett, Keyonte, Sensabaugh and Miller all have similar flaws - not very good athleticism, not good burst off the dribble to get to the rim, not great finishing at the rim, not great handle, not great defenders, not elite passers. These guys are obviously all better shooting prospects than the twins, but the twins crush them in all of those other areas (athleticism, burst, rim pressure, defense, passing, ability to rise up over a defender at the rim). Then you have Whitmore, who does have really good athleticism, but is not a good defender, really low passing feel, can only drive in straight lines..)

Whitehead (in addition to injury red flags) has really just been a supporting piece at Duke so it's hard to project the type of star upside that the Thompsons have. The injuries have taken away a lot of Whitehead's athleticism (perhaps the athleticism comes back over time as he gets healthier but that's no guarantee), his handle was the weakest part of his game prior to the injuries, his defense is good but not nearly on the twins level (his D has also gotten worse at Duke post-injury than it was at Monterve), his passing feel is average at best.

In the similar boat as some of these guys I just mentioned in the "good shooters but not great at anything else" bucket is Jabari Smith. Similar deal. Couldn't dribble, couldn't get to the rim, low number of dunks, low FG% at the rim, high % of his rim attempts that got blocked, very good defender but very low feel passer, not great athleticism. But now in the NBA he is only shooting 30% from 3. That's the danger when you draft a guy and so much of his value as a prospect is tied to his shooting. If the shots aren't falling, then it's hard for that player to be a positive contributor. Same thing happened with Aaron Nesmith - he got drafted lottery and is was mostly tied to his shooting. But then the shots weren't falling as much in the NBA and then he gets benched.

Bottom line:

1) The twins shooting profile isn't as bleak as you guys think when you consider volume - and compare that volume to other prospects from the past couple years.

2) If you only look at shooting, sure, maybe you have them in the 13-16 range. But if that's the case, then you would also have Anthony Black, Josh Giddey, Scottie Barnes, GG Jackson, Jeremy Sochan, Dyson Daniels and Jarace Walker in that range.

3) Looking at only shooting is a big mistake. Like I said, guys like George, Whitehead, Miller, Sensabaugh, Howard and Whitmore project as better shooters, but the twins are better in basically every other area (most areas the twins are MUCH better than these guys). And shooting is the easiest thing to improve on once you're in the league.

Lastly, another indicator for shooting projection is volume and % of 2 point jumpers. I don't have stats on this or a whole breakdown comparing them to the other guys listed above, but if you've watched a good chunk of OTE games you'd know that the twins do take a good volume of 2 pt jumpers (because opposing defenses pack it into the paint to try and force them to take jumpers) and while their % of making 2 pt jumpers (I don't think) is great, they do make at least some of them here and there which is a good sign - especially where lots of the other guys mentioned in this post (Barnes, Sochan, Jarace Walker, Brandon Miller, Giddey, Keyonte, Whitmore, etc.) do not take (or make) very many 2 pt jumpers at all..


(1) volume + 3PT% + FT% using some of your comparable players already in the NBA + Black because he is mocked in a similar area:
Banchero
3/34%/74%
Just not comparable percentages to Amen, and still quite a bit better than Ausar. Also a big, so spacing the court is much less of a swing skill, just needed to develop a bit to keep defenses honest. Still shooting 32% from 3 in the NBA.

Sochan
3/29%/59%
The question for Sochan was shooting, he has completely revamped his stroke, people were more comfortable with him b/c he was a big, so while shooting was a swing skill he could still carve out a role without it. Still shooting 27% from 3, so it is not clear he can shoot. Seems like a poor example thus far.

Daniels
3.6/26%/74%
The question for Daniels was shooting. He is shooting 31% from 3 in the NBA, but did exhibit development in the gleague in that regard. It's still not clear he is going to be an average or plus shooter, it is still the swing skill that will determine his future role in the NBA. FT% much better than both twins.

Wagner
3.6 attempts/34.5%/84%
Clearly not comparable to the Thompson twins in terms of percentages.

Black
3/32%/72%
Shooting is the clear swing skill. Percentages are much better than Amen, similar to Ausar (FT% a bit better).

I will say that I have more confidence in Ausar because his percentages are not as atrocious, but you mainly cited some mid/late lottery players, and the ones for whom shooting was a swing skill still have not become + shooters in the NBA. Out of the guys you mentioned I think the only + shooter of the group is Franz. So I don't see a convincing argument here at all. I also think you are straw manning a bit, most people recognized a lot of these guys needed to work on their shooting - and the ones for whom that was not the case, were just not comparable to Amen/Ausar (esp. Amen).

We are also talking about where the twins should go, I am not sure they should be in that 3-6 range, and my impression is that you think they should be. If that's the case, it's also not totally relevant that guys mocked far after them (i.e. that we can recognize there are more questions or lower upside) have bigger questions. I'll fully admit that if, say, Amen learns to shoot at 36% from 3 in the league on good volume that he could easily be the second or third best prospect in this class, barring injuries for he and other players.

(2) other guys also couldn't shoot
That point matters, IMO, most with guards and wings in the same draft range. I didn't have Giddey in the conversation for third, I didn't have Daniels there, I don't have Walker there, and I agree that Black's shooting is likely going to be bad enough that he shouldn't be there, either. But I do think all those guys were reasonable picks in the 5-12 range, and that's were the twins should be.

(3) other guys have different questions (athleticism)

Sure, not sure how that is relevant. No one is saying that other prospects don't have their own issues. The point is that the twins are older than most of the other lottery prospects, while not exhibiting much development on their swing skill. The other guys may live or die in terms of being stars vs. roleplayers based on their athleticism. Most of the guys you are talking about though just are not going to go top 5-7, so outside of George and Whitmore, I don't see the point (and I don't think the Twins are more developed than George in almost any way; they are athletes with some court vision and in that regard are more developed, but George is a bonafide scorer who isn't selfish --- that pretty easily translates, I'm not sure pnr/drivers who can't shoot translates as easily). Some guys I disagree with your assessment on in terms of their place physically in the league, but that doesn't change the overall point.

-Not sure where you're getting your stats but Daniels shot 53% on free throws for the Ignite
-Not sure why you said this part "I didn't have Giddey in the conversation for third, I didn't have Daniels there, I don't have Walker there, and I agree that Black's shooting is likely going to be bad enough that he shouldn't be there, either." I never said anything about the twins being the 3rd pick so not sure why you added this part in. But Giddey certainly has a case for going top 3 in a 2021 redraft and Jarace Walker has a case for going 3rd in 2023. And while we're on the subject, who do you have 3rd and 4th on your board? I'm guessing whoever it is, the twins have a case for being a better prospect than at least 1 of them (if not both of them). It will also be kind of funny if you have Brandon Miller top 4, since you made such a big deal about the Thompson's age, yet they are both younger than Miller.
-Describing the twins as "athletes with some court vision" is really oversimplifying them as prospects - and underselling them significantly
-I don't consider paolo or Sochan to be a "big" and think both of them have played basically zero minutes at center this season
-Nothing to say about Barnes? Seems like he is probably the closest comparison we have in recent drafts as a guy with good athleticism, high passing feel, good defense about the same size, can get to his spots off the dribble but big questions about the shooting. He went 4th overall, he won ROY and is a franchise cornerstone for the raptors. Yet he didn't show the athleticism or rim pressure as the twins..not as good a shooter as Ausar, not as good a passer as Amen..
-Sochan isn't a poor example. I'm not arguing that these guys will become better shooters. I'm simply arguing that NBA teams will take a chance and use a high draft pick on a guy, even if they have shooting concerns. That's it. Full stop. So Sochan is a good example, so is Daniels, so is Scottie Barnes, so is Josh Giddey, Dieng and so is Anthony Black (currently going top 5 in some mocks). So is Kuminga. Whether these guys have improved as shooters in the NBA isn't really relevant because a) guys can still be really good NBA players without being elite shooters and b) NBA teams will draft these guys knowing that shooting is the easiest thing for players to improve in the league. Now, while I say that, NBA teams are also realistic and know that it takes time and to not expect some crazy improvement after only a half a season in the NBA.
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 21,493
And1: 20,054
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#68 » by Hal14 » Wed Feb 1, 2023 11:54 pm

Let's look at the age thing.

GG Jackson 12/17/2004
Dariq Whitehead 8/1/2004
Cam Whitmore 7/8/2004
Nick Smith Jr 4/18/2004
Scoot Henderson 2/3/2004
Anthony Black 1/20/2004
Victor Wembanyama 1/4/2004
Gradey Dick 11/20/2003
Keyonte George 11/8/2003
Cason Wallace 11/7/2003
Brice Sensabaugh 10/31/2003
Jett Howard 9/14/2003
Jarace Walker 9/4/2003
Ausar Thompson 1/30/2003
Amen Thompson 1/30/2003
Brandon Miller 11/22/2002
Maxwell Lewis 7/27/2002

So, out of the 17 guys who have the best shot at going in the lottery, the twins are the 14th and 15th oldest. So, they are on the older side but keep in mind lots of people are putting Miller top 5 (some even putting him at no. 3) and he's older than the twins.

Also, the twins are only 8 months older than Jarace and Jett, only 9 months older than Brice, just 10 months older than Dick, Keyonte and Wallace. Less than a year older than Wemby and Black.

Anything less than a year, really isn't that much of a difference.

And let's remember that last year we had 3 sophomores go in the top 6. Plus Chet (a sophomore aged freshman) went number 2..Murray was a junior aged sophomore and went number 4. So while age is obviously a factor, let's not overrate how important it is to NBA GM's.

The Bleacher Report mocks by Jonathan Wasserman usually are fueled by quite a bit of intel from NBA teams. The latest one was posted today, with the twins going 3 and 4..

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10063177-2023-nba-mock-draft-full-2-round-predictions-week-before-trade-deadline

Lastly, the other reason we shouldn't overrate a player's age too much is because just because a player is a year younger, that doesn't necessarily mean they will improve at a crazy amount during that year. Daimion Collins stock dropped significantly as a freshman. So did Matthew Cleveland, so did Jaden Hardy, so did Patrick Baldwin Jr, Peyton Watson, Harrison Ingram, Moussa Diabate. James Bouknight, JT Thor and Kai Jones got drafted because they were "young" but didn't take a leap once they got to NBA. Moses Moody and Jaden Springer got drafted and a big selling point for them was how young they were - well, what happened? Did being younger magically mean they'd show some crazy development once they were in the NBA? Of course not. Meanwhile, older prospects like Keegan Murray, Davion Mitchell, Chris Duarte, Herb Jones, Payton Pritchard have been much better NBA players. Emoni Bates was young and look at how his draft stock plummeted last year - while Agbaji's stock soared.
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
MemphisX
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,819
And1: 3,735
Joined: Nov 10, 2011

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#69 » by MemphisX » Thu Feb 2, 2023 1:43 am

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=XvUuvPMdI-WjhzcIMu47Fw
Check out my Memphis Grizzlies Youtube Channel --->>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbB6yGykQEUwl9hqWYVp45g
User avatar
The Moose
General Manager
Posts: 9,291
And1: 5,259
Joined: Apr 18, 2012
Location: Australia
 

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#70 » by The Moose » Thu Feb 2, 2023 1:48 am

Read on Twitter
?t=_IWjX9jB2KT5iw_-BYExXg&s=19

Both twins shooting under 40% in the half court

They are both complete transition merchants at this point that are negatives in the half court
Image
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,922
And1: 19,733
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#71 » by NO-KG-AI » Thu Feb 2, 2023 5:27 am

The physical profile is tantalizing on paper. I wouldn't be so mad at a guy not shooting great inside the 3 point line overall, but those numbers at the rim are YIKES
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,667
And1: 4,695
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#72 » by CptCrunch » Thu Feb 2, 2023 6:48 am

Did you guys see the prime Dwight Howard the Thompsons played against the other week. The guy must have blocked 15 shots and scared away another dozen.

Besides, goal tending is not allowed in the league unlike OTE so their shooting percentages will go up plus the open lanes will enable Amen to bulldoze his way to the rim for dunks every possession.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 21,493
And1: 20,054
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#73 » by Hal14 » Thu Feb 2, 2023 2:46 pm

NO-KG-AI wrote:The physical profile is tantalizing on paper. I wouldn't be so mad at a guy not shooting great inside the 3 point line overall, but those numbers at the rim are YIKES

The spacing they have to deal with is yikes. Teams pack it into the paint when defending them and have 2 (or even 3) big bodies at the rim challenging their shots there.

BoxAndOne also posted the same stats but for GG, whitmore and Black.

Just looking at their half court FG% at the rim:

Amen 52%
Ausar 39%
Whitmore 55%
GG 51%
Black 54%

So they're all pretty close to each other, in the same ballpark..except for Ausar. But Ausar is probably the best defender out of the bunch..and has a much higher 3 pt% than Amen. Ausar's 3 pt% is in same ballpark as GG, Black and Whitmore..

It'll be interesting to see how the data looks with a full season's worth of numbers..
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
SeattleJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,324
And1: 2,710
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#74 » by SeattleJazzFan » Thu Feb 2, 2023 6:10 pm

MemphisX wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=XvUuvPMdI-WjhzcIMu47Fw


so basically everything they do outside of dunking sucks.
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,667
And1: 4,695
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#75 » by CptCrunch » Thu Feb 2, 2023 6:26 pm

And we have a dude here comparing OTE stats against high schoolers against stats from Power 5 games against 20-22 year olds.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,441
And1: 9,244
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#76 » by Braggins » Thu Feb 2, 2023 6:35 pm

CptCrunch wrote:And we have a dude here comparing OTE stats against high schoolers against stats from Power 5 games against 20-22 year olds.

and their numbers are usually still worse, so I really don't get why these comparisons are being brought up as a positive somehow
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 21,493
And1: 20,054
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#77 » by Hal14 » Thu Feb 2, 2023 7:17 pm

CptCrunch wrote:And we have a dude here comparing OTE stats against high schoolers against stats from Power 5 games against 20-22 year olds.

Are you capable of having a discussion about these prospects without talking about the competition level in OTE? Seems to be all you talk about - it's a major crutch for you. You should change your name to CptCrutch.

The spacing in OTE is far worse than Power 5 colleges..
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
buzzkilloton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,858
And1: 2,442
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
Location: Bangkok
 

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#78 » by buzzkilloton » Fri Feb 3, 2023 12:08 am

So Boozer has played two OTE elite teams. Much better numbers then the Thompsons.

Then their is another 15 year old Quaintance that is the next best prospect in OTE. He was a #30 prospect in highschool. The Thompsons numbers are better then his but their not top 5 in the NBA draft at 5 years older better numbers.

https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/02/how-good-are-the-thompson-twins/
User avatar
The Moose
General Manager
Posts: 9,291
And1: 5,259
Joined: Apr 18, 2012
Location: Australia
 

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#79 » by The Moose » Fri Feb 3, 2023 1:31 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=VYtUUKP8a59BX9_uBokrGQ&s=19

The Thompson Twins rim fg% drops over 20% from non half-court to half-court attempts?

Ausar is supposedly a generational athlete while shooting 26% on halfcourt layups and has 5 dunks in the halfcourt for the entire season
Image
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 21,493
And1: 20,054
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Amen & Ausar Thompson - Potential 2022 NBA Draft Guys 

Post#80 » by Hal14 » Fri Feb 3, 2023 2:59 pm

The Moose wrote:
Read on Twitter
?t=VYtUUKP8a59BX9_uBokrGQ&s=19

The Thompson Twins rim fg% drops over 20% from non half-court to half-court attempts?

Ausar is supposedly a generational athlete while shooting 26% on halfcourt layups and has 5 dunks in the halfcourt for the entire season

Season is only like halfway over. Saying "entire season" makes it seem like you're reaching.

And I'm not sure if you've watched any OTE games but the spacing is horrible. Teams pack it into the paint, keeping them out of the paint and when they do get to there's 2 (if not 3) defenders there.

And it's also not fair to the twins to filter out transition plays. That's a big selling point for them as prospects. They're so fast, so explosive and athletic and use their instincts so well for leaking out and passing it ahead on the break, that they're able to get lots of easy buckets in transition.

Why are we penalizing them for being really good at something?

Is transition not a part of NBA basketball? Last time I checked, it was.

Running data and filtering out transition baskets for the twins is like filtering out 3 pointers for Brandon Miller or filtering out blocks for Wemby.
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)

Return to NBA Draft