clyde21 wrote:yoyoboy wrote:clyde21 wrote:
in the lotto you draft for upside, not median outcomes. even if Williams has a higher chance of reaching his best case scenario, you don't pull the trigger that high on this archetype, im sorry.
this is why a dude like Joshua Primo went 12th last year...everyone was surprised, I wasn't...you draft for upside in the lotto. that's just how it should be. you can find players like Mark Williams in FA every year.
no disrespect to Williams either I like him for what it is, but yea no way lotto.
In a weaker draft like this though? I’m not sure there are players around 10-11 who have outrageously more upside than Williams. Realistically you’re looking at slightly more upside with significantly worse median outcomes. I can agree in the upper half of the lotto you shoot mainly for upside but after that, especially when the draft class isn’t impressive, I’d be perfectly comfortable drafting a player with a good chance of being a high-level role player. It’s why I was so adamant on the Cavs picking Mikal Bridges in 2018. You knew he wouldn’t be a star yet I’m pretty sure half the teams in the lotto are now kicking themselves for passing up on him. Also I’m really not sure there are plenty of players in FA like Mark Williams every year. There are a lot of teams who need defensive bigs right now that can’t seem to find them. And how many of them have 7’7 wingspans?
Utah just drafted Udoka at the end of R1 couple of yrs ago who had a 7-7 wingspan, it's something but still not really huge factor, and yea you can find a lot bigs in FA to D up the paint and grab a few boards for you, it's not particularly hard or expensive. you can also find them later in the draft on a regular basis.
for example in 2021 draft you had:
Sharpe #27
Queta #39
Bassey #53
Sims #58
is Williams really that much better than these guys in terms of how his archetype is gonna project?
and yea, doesn't matter if it's a weak class, you always gotta aim high if you're picking lotto and really the top20 tbh, a guy like Mark Williams doesn't really change the trajectory of your team at all even if he reaches his high end outcome. also a Williams high end outcome would likely have less impact than a wing's or a combo guards medium outcome, that has to factor.
but at the end of the day different people have different draft philosophies.
I think Mark is a better prospect than any of those guys. But with that said, I dont see the value of taking him high in the draft. Even if Mark is the top level of this archetype of a player, I dont think the impact difference is still great enough to make him worth a top 10ish or lotto pick, compared to say an average raw defensive big that you can get early 2nd.
This is why I dont think about taking raw athletic/defensive only bigs higher than 25 in the draft (I feel like if your picking 25th-30th in the 1st, youre an elite team and using a 1st on a guy like this can be worth it).
Gobert: 27th overall pick
Capella: 25th overall pick
Williams: 27th overall pick
Gafford: 38th overall pick
Mitchell Robinson: 36th overall pick
Those 5 guys make up half of the top 10 in blocked shots at the moment so far this season. Those are also kind of the who's who in defensive 1st bigs. You can throw Jarrett Allen in there as well (22nd overall pick).
That to me is when a player of this archetype enters my draft board. Basically the ideal 1st round pick for already elite teams who could use a 5, or the ideal 2nd round pick for a bad lotto team. But ya raw athletic 5s or defense only 5s, 25th pick and on is where the value becomes worth it. Not because they will end up being the 25th or worse player in the draft, but that is the time where you can find these guys in most drafts.