dham1974 wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:dham1974 wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but Jabari plays on one end of the floor. He's not great from long range he's melo without the versatile scoring. So how does he have higher floor? Ingram is the better passer more versatile scorer and better defender.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
I dont have much doubt that Jabari will be a good 3 point shooter within the next couple years. He was a good 3 point shooter all throughout high school and the first half of college. He has good form so I dont think it will be long till hes a legit threat from there. Jabar was the better 3 point shooter than Melo in college and Melo didnt have a good 3 point shooting season till he was 24, Melo has had 8 seasons where he has shot under 35% from 3. Jabari has the much better footwork and low post scoring as well than Ingram. Jabari is also the far superior athlete as well. Ingram without a doubt is the superior defender coming out of college and has the higher defensive upside. But I think Jabari has all the tools to become at least an average defender. I think he is going to be an offensive stud, I think in a couple years Jabari is going to be a 23-25 ppg scorer while shooting around 50% (again put up 19/6 on 50% after the break this year). I dont think the edge Ingram is going to have over him on defense will be enough to make up for the edge on the offensive end that Jabari has.
So you're talking about all the things Jabari could work on and become better but acting like Ingram is a finished product lol ok
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Jabari Parker's weakness coming into the NBA was lack of athleticism, lack of ability to get into the paint, below the rim play - which he proved all of that wrong (he's probably one of the most dynamic finishers in the NBA), essentially he mitigated most of his offensive weaknesses already.
The thing you're harping on...is one of the things that Parker proved he could already do. Parker could shoot in college and HS, and just doesn't take shots in the NBA out of coaching design.
How is projecting Parker to be a 3 point shooter, which is what people already know he can do, the same as giving Parker benefit of the doubt while giving Ingram none?
Also, it is way easier to project the type of player Parker will become than Ingram because Parker is not nearly as raw as Ingram (nor was Parker as raw as Ingram when Parker was in college).
On top of that, Parker was a better player in college than Ingram was...