clyde21 wrote:nolang1 wrote:karkinos wrote:i love this draft class
mostly because of UK (pj washington, keldon johnson, and tyler herro).
given how disciplined herro played under calipari, and although his high school mixtapes show him as a great one on one shot creator vs lesser competition, he could be a really, really excellent rip hamilton type of guy if he gets the right coach and system.
Kentucky was a borderline top 10 team in a weak year for college basketball as a whole. I understand that sometimes the whole isn't quite as good as the sum of its parts, but I'm having a hard time seeing how the 3rd-best player on a college team that wasn't some dominant juggernaut is supposed to be a difference-maker in the NBA.
better Kentucky class than '18 IMO.
Herro/PJ/Keldon
Knox/Shai/Vanderbilt
and I liked SGA/Vanderbilt
Well that would leave Knox, who was dead last in the league in RPM and has a long way to go to not be a total bust, as the 3rd-best. So like I said, how is one college team that wasn't that great supposed to have multiple NBA prospects worth getting excited about? At least last year, someone like Vanderbilt wasn't helping the team much because he was limited due to injury and got drafted in the 2nd round based on what he showed in high school. I get that it's much easier to just 'like' every prospect so that whenever some late pick pans out, you get to say 'see I told you so' while the 20-30 other players who wash out of the league are quickly forgotten, but if a college team has 3 lottery picks (and the supporting cast isn't all walk-ons) that's typically enough to steamroll the vast majority of teams to a much greater degree than Kentucky did.