Baseline Runner wrote:Carter is intriguing to me because he is a PF with strong rim protection skills. There haven't been many of those in the NBA lately.
So he is a 5. I agree.
Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831
Baseline Runner wrote:Carter is intriguing to me because he is a PF with strong rim protection skills. There haven't been many of those in the NBA lately.
cedric76 wrote:I think Carter will be drafted by orlando if JJJ and Bamba r gone
Baseline Runner wrote:Chi town wrote:Love is worth a late 1st. Age and injury.
BS, you are aware half to 2/3s of the draft picks in the top 10 will either be a bust or have mediocre careers. Draft picks are so overrated.
arh1109 wrote:Wendall Carter Jr. – Zach Randolph
Shared the low post with Marvin Bagley at Duke. He’s a big body down low who can score in different areas on the floor. Has a solid jumpshot from midrange and hopefully will be a knockdown three point shooter at the next level. His anticipation on rebounds is fairly good as he isn’t the best vertical leaper at the center spot. Solid strength for a center although his wingspan and standing reach are average. Has decent verticality. Has great basketball i.q. and a good defender at the 5 spot. One of his weaknesses is an inability to slide his feet on switches. I don’t think this will be a huge problem at the next level. In my opinion, he is one of the most complete players in the draft. He’s already close to reaching his full potential and will be a solid player for whoever drafts him.
GameBredAPBT wrote:arh1109 wrote:Wendall Carter Jr. – Zach Randolph
Shared the low post with Marvin Bagley at Duke. He’s a big body down low who can score in different areas on the floor. Has a solid jumpshot from midrange and hopefully will be a knockdown three point shooter at the next level. His anticipation on rebounds is fairly good as he isn’t the best vertical leaper at the center spot. Solid strength for a center although his wingspan and standing reach are average. Has decent verticality. Has great basketball i.q. and a good defender at the 5 spot. One of his weaknesses is an inability to slide his feet on switches. I don’t think this will be a huge problem at the next level. In my opinion, he is one of the most complete players in the draft. He’s already close to reaching his full potential and will be a solid player for whoever drafts him.
If I didn't know any better, I'd wager this was a troll post (heck, perhaps it is).
Carter has almost nothing in common with Randolph.
Also, a 19 year old is close to reaching his full potential? Okay....what? Not only is he not done maturing physically, he had a very underwhelming year at Duke. He was drafted based off of potential, not what he showed in college.
arh1109 wrote:GameBredAPBT wrote:arh1109 wrote:Wendall Carter Jr. – Zach Randolph
Shared the low post with Marvin Bagley at Duke. He’s a big body down low who can score in different areas on the floor. Has a solid jumpshot from midrange and hopefully will be a knockdown three point shooter at the next level. His anticipation on rebounds is fairly good as he isn’t the best vertical leaper at the center spot. Solid strength for a center although his wingspan and standing reach are average. Has decent verticality. Has great basketball i.q. and a good defender at the 5 spot. One of his weaknesses is an inability to slide his feet on switches. I don’t think this will be a huge problem at the next level. In my opinion, he is one of the most complete players in the draft. He’s already close to reaching his full potential and will be a solid player for whoever drafts him.
If I didn't know any better, I'd wager this was a troll post (heck, perhaps it is).
Carter has almost nothing in common with Randolph.
Also, a 19 year old is close to reaching his full potential? Okay....what? Not only is he not done maturing physically, he had a very underwhelming year at Duke. He was drafted based off of potential, not what he showed in college.
There both 6'9 and have relative short wingspans to play center. They both have shooting touch. They both have strength that they use more than atheleticism to carve out space on rebounds and postups. They both run the floor in a similar amount of time. And I don't know how you define potential. I say its how skilled a player already is in different facets of the game, attitude, and work ethic. I think he has most of those down besides maybe attitude. You can't improve athelticism, body, or a player's intelligence/mind.
Truebiscuit wrote:arh1109 wrote:GameBredAPBT wrote:
If I didn't know any better, I'd wager this was a troll post (heck, perhaps it is).
Carter has almost nothing in common with Randolph.
Also, a 19 year old is close to reaching his full potential? Okay....what? Not only is he not done maturing physically, he had a very underwhelming year at Duke. He was drafted based off of potential, not what he showed in college.
There both 6'9 and have relative short wingspans to play center. They both have shooting touch. They both have strength that they use more than atheleticism to carve out space on rebounds and postups. They both run the floor in a similar amount of time. And I don't know how you define potential. I say its how skilled a player already is in different facets of the game, attitude, and work ethic. I think he has most of those down besides maybe attitude. You can't improve athelticism, body, or a player's intelligence/mind.
He's got a 7'4.5" wingspan with a 9'1" standing reach... I don't know if I'd call that short.
GimmeDat wrote:The more I go back and watch to reassure myself, the happier I am. He will almost undoubtedly be a high positive impact player. Maybe he won't put up stat-lines on the level of some of the top picks in this draft, but Wendell could quickly become an integral ying to Markkanen's yang.
Grits n Gravy wrote:GimmeDat wrote:The more I go back and watch to reassure myself, the happier I am. He will almost undoubtedly be a high positive impact player. Maybe he won't put up stat-lines on the level of some of the top picks in this draft, but Wendell could quickly become an integral ying to Markkanen's yang.
A lot of people who don't watch the Celtics play criticize or at least misunderstand Al Horford. He's one of the most impactful players in the league and never puts up big, gaudy numbers. Funnily enough quite a few people have compared him to Al I believe.
GimmeDat wrote:Grits n Gravy wrote:GimmeDat wrote:The more I go back and watch to reassure myself, the happier I am. He will almost undoubtedly be a high positive impact player. Maybe he won't put up stat-lines on the level of some of the top picks in this draft, but Wendell could quickly become an integral ying to Markkanen's yang.
A lot of people who don't watch the Celtics play criticize or at least misunderstand Al Horford. He's one of the most impactful players in the league and never puts up big, gaudy numbers. Funnily enough quite a few people have compared him to Al I believe.
Yeah, and what's more, Carter is an elite rebounder compared to Al, and maayybe more athletic (will have to go back and watch young Al), probably a more advanced array of scoring moves as well.
It remains to be seen whether Wendell can be a defender anywhere close to Horford though (he should beat him as a rim protector but the mobility and awareness is the question mark), whether his passing is on the same level, and I would say Al seems to be better driving off face up situations, though Wendell could well be good at that as well. I'd also say Wendell's shot is a question mark to a degree, though Al's isn't exactly elite himself (outside of him shooting 43% this year on 3 attempts a game, which was great).
If we get an Al-esque piece with Carter, I'll be a happy man.
Dr Positivity wrote:I like the player but I don't really like him and Markkanen going forward together on defense. Seems like they would have trouble against the GSWs and HOUs
GimmeDat wrote:The more I go back and watch to reassure myself, the happier I am. He will almost undoubtedly be a high positive impact player. Maybe he won't put up stat-lines on the level of some of the top picks in this draft, but Wendell could quickly become an integral ying to Markkanen's yang.
Dr Positivity wrote:I like the player but I don't really like him and Markkanen going forward together on defense. Seems like they would have trouble against the GSWs and HOUs