EvanZ wrote:nolang1 wrote:MemphisX wrote:The problem is most people stopped watching Melo after Lonzo. If you actually watched him every step of the way and especially his growth in Australia, this was a likely consequence of his development. I was one of the most positive Melo supporters and I did not think he would develop this fast though.
He was like 40% true shooting in Australia. I would've taken him as the Timberwolves but it's definitely revisionist to act like he'd come in shooting this well or that he was some super obvious #1 prospect.
Uh is it revisionist if you had him obviously #1 and published it before the Draft?
What's disingenuous is to act like nobody had him #1.
Where did I say that? Learn to read, I'm obviously referring to the assertion that it was a 'likely consequence of his development' to go from 25% on threes in Australia to 36% so far as a rookie and be this successful out of the gate. Obviously this draft was regarded as not very strong and there's also a major difference between having him #1 and thinking he was going to be a Zion or Luka type of prospect who was head and shoulders above everyone else in the draft.