clyde21 wrote: getrichordie wrote:
i think you're confused tbh but have at it
Man you really resort to anything when the discussion isn't going your way.
why would a continue a discussion with a dude that has no idea what the discussion is about?
Pretty certain it's the other way around.
You don't understand the difference between my Butler take and my Mannion take? Maybe you have forgotten what I said about Butler. IDK. I can't speak to what you are thinking, only what you are posting. I have absolutely nothing against 6'3 guards. What I do have a problem is people catapulting prospects because they are
6'3 with questionable skill sets as it pertains to how well they will translate to the NBA.
Somehow, during this discussion about Mannion, you've singled out that I pointed out Mannion is 6'3" when it was more about his translatable skill set only having vision + IQ. You've also managed to compare Mannion to Conley when it had ZERO relation to the question I asked and when I pointed out the difference between the prospects, you pivoted and ducked my counterargument. After that, or maybe somewhere in between, you also managed to falsely state that Ball was on my #1 board.
So I'm well aware of the discussion being had. Are you? Because you keep bringing up stuff that isn't pertinent at all in an effort to change the topic or fluff up your theory that I have something against 6'3" guards when I'm clearly higher on Crutcher and Flynn than most, but you choose to ignore that for some strange reason.
Lastly, dude -- it's okay to be wrong. Just accept it and move on.