Evan Mobley - USC
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:51 pm
needs his own thread, IMO best big prospect since Towns, multi-level, multi-position big that can create on his own, stretch, score inside and defend.
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2024151
ThunderBolt wrote:Right now Cade is my number one but I’m definitely feeling better if okc doesn’t get number one. His performance this week was so well rounded. I read some comments about him not being athletic. I don’t see a non-athlete at all. He’s definitely more fluid than dynamic but I think I would prefer that in the modern nba.
ThunderBolt wrote:Right now Cade is my number one but I’m definitely feeling better if okc doesn’t get number one. His performance this week was so well rounded. I read some comments about him not being athletic. I don’t see a non-athlete at all. He’s definitely more fluid than dynamic but I think I would prefer that in the modern nba.
clyde21 wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:Right now Cade is my number one but I’m definitely feeling better if okc doesn’t get number one. His performance this week was so well rounded. I read some comments about him not being athletic. I don’t see a non-athlete at all. He’s definitely more fluid than dynamic but I think I would prefer that in the modern nba.
i think Cade+SGA would be too tempting to pass up in the back court for you guys
Marcus wrote:clyde21 wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:Right now Cade is my number one but I’m definitely feeling better if okc doesn’t get number one. His performance this week was so well rounded. I read some comments about him not being athletic. I don’t see a non-athlete at all. He’s definitely more fluid than dynamic but I think I would prefer that in the modern nba.
i think Cade+SGA would be too tempting to pass up in the back court for you guys
How long you give that combo before best back court in the association convo becomes legit?
clyde21 wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:Right now Cade is my number one but I’m definitely feeling better if okc doesn’t get number one. His performance this week was so well rounded. I read some comments about him not being athletic. I don’t see a non-athlete at all. He’s definitely more fluid than dynamic but I think I would prefer that in the modern nba.
i think Cade+SGA would be too tempting to pass up in the back court for you guys
ThunderBolt wrote:clyde21 wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:Right now Cade is my number one but I’m definitely feeling better if okc doesn’t get number one. His performance this week was so well rounded. I read some comments about him not being athletic. I don’t see a non-athlete at all. He’s definitely more fluid than dynamic but I think I would prefer that in the modern nba.
i think Cade+SGA would be too tempting to pass up in the back court for you guys
Agreed. However Moberly looks like a great consolation prize if things don’t go our way. Perhaps I’m just used to watching a more clumsy brute center in Steven adams, but Mobley impressed me. I’m higher on bigs in the modern NBA than a lot of people.
clyde21 wrote:Marcus wrote:clyde21 wrote:
i think Cade+SGA would be too tempting to pass up in the back court for you guys
How long you give that combo before best back court in the association convo becomes legit?
probably within a couple of years, they are that good, two 6-7 dudes that can score, pass and defend? ridiculous.
Marcus wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:clyde21 wrote:
i think Cade+SGA would be too tempting to pass up in the back court for you guys
Agreed. However Moberly looks like a great consolation prize if things don’t go our way. Perhaps I’m just used to watching a more clumsy brute center in Steven adams, but Mobley impressed me. I’m higher on bigs in the modern NBA than a lot of people.
Always felt like the guard takeover was only going to last as long as it took bigs to bridge the skill gap. Size is always unteachable so always priority one IMO. The PnP PnR plus perimeter and rim protection potential combo of SGA and Mobes makes sense. Sets the foundation of mobile size at two key positions. I wouldn't be so curious about what's at the top because there are options at each position. I'd be looking at the additional first rounders and figuring out what fits there.
clyde21 wrote:not including Zion but yes, obviously not better than Zion.
Fischella wrote:clyde21 wrote:not including Zion but yes, obviously not better than Zion.
So he really isn't the best big man prospect since KAT, is he?
Maybe don't use hyperboles when they aren't warranted just for dramatic effect and making a point