Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 1,427
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#1 » by ecuhus1981 » Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:41 pm

I would like to frame this discussion from a big-board perspective, instead of a literal "re-draft". The teams that selected players had not only talent in mind, but team direction, positional fit and many other factors in their decisions.

With that said, here is how I see the 2019 draft class, in terms of current on-court production as well as long-term asset value:

1) Zion Williamson
2) Ja Morant
3) DeAndre Hunter
4) RJ Barrett
5) Tyler Herro
6) Darius Garland
7) Matias Thybulle
8) Brandon Clarke
9) PJ Washington
10) Cameron Johnson
11) Coby White
12) Cam Reddish
13) Talen Horton-Tucker
14) Nicholas Claxton
15) Nickeil Alexander-Walker
16) Rui Hachimura
17) Chuma Okeke
18) Bol Bol
19) Cody Martin
20) Daniel Gafford

I'm sure you'll have your own spin on this list, so please share. Let me know who you think I should have higher or lower, and provide your own Top 20, thanks!
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
User avatar
Roger Murdock
RealGM
Posts: 11,884
And1: 4,658
Joined: Aug 12, 2008
 

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#2 » by Roger Murdock » Wed Apr 21, 2021 4:24 pm

If you could go back to draft night I’m fairly certain the top 5 remains the exact same. I think the shake up would be if the Pelicans don’t trade with the Hawks (which looks like a disaster now) and take Garland at 4 who’s a perfect fit with Zion. But in that event Cavs just take Hunter and it’s still the same top 5.

After that it gets Whacky. Culver is a total bust. White and Hayes don’t look good but have some tools. Rui stays top 10. Reddish goes R2 like Culver.

Lots of good players though. I’d round out the top 10 with Herro, Rui, Clarke, Keldon, and Washington in some order
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 31,041
And1: 14,297
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Tuscaloosa Alabama
Contact:
     

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#3 » by babyjax13 » Wed Apr 21, 2021 4:54 pm

I think this is a draft where talent evaluators performed better than usual. The player I was most insistent that I did not buy the hype on was Culver (I thought NAW was a slightly superior prospect and Culver was going to be overdrafted) but outside of that the lottery didn't look terrible. I think Hayes is probably a bit underrated on this list and in general, I think New Orleans is making a mistake by playing Adams more than him, tbh. I agree that Keldon Johnson should be higher, and KPJ should be on the list...but otherwise not too many qualms with the list you have.

Bazley, Grant Williams, and Jordan Poole should probably be on the bubble for the top 20, as well.

1. Zion Williamson
2. Ja Morant
3. RJ Barrett
4. De'Andre Hunter
5. Tyler Herro
6. Kevin Porter Jr.
7. PJ Washington
8. Darius Garland
9. Keldon Johnson
10. Jaxson Hayes
11. Brandon Clarke
12. Nic Claxton
13. Chuma Okeke
14. Talen Horton-Tucker
15. Coby White
16. Rui Hachimura
17. Cam Reddish
18. Nickiel Alexander Walker
19. Darius Bazley
20. Grant Williams
---
Bubble (no order): Jordan Poole, Daniel Gafford, Cody Martin, Caleb Martin, Bol Bol, Jalen McDaniels, Jaylen Nowell, Eric Paschall, Isaiah Roby, Goga Bitazde, Luka Samancic, Ty Jerome, Terrence Mann, Miye Oni

It was a monster of a draft.

EDIT: I'd move Garland up to 3 and move KPJ over Herro and Washington over Hunter the more I think about it (and the more I've seen Garland).
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 61,713
And1: 69,197
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
   

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#4 » by clyde21 » Wed Apr 21, 2021 5:22 pm

this is a mix of what I thought before the draft (because it's still early) and what we've seen so far in the NBA

1 Zion Williamson
2 RJ Barrett
3 Ja Morant
4 DeAndre Hunter
5 Tyler Herro
6 Darius Garland
7 Keldon Johnson
8 Kevin Porter Jr.
9 Bol Bol
10 Coby White
11 P.J. Washington
12 Nicolas Claxton
13 Chuma Okeke
14 Nickeil Alexander-Walker
15 Brandon Clarke
16 Darius Bazley
17 Matisse Thybulle
18 Luguentz Dort
19 Talen Horton-Tucker
20 Rui Hachimura

biggest disappointment for me so far has been Sekou.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 61,713
And1: 69,197
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
   

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#5 » by clyde21 » Wed Apr 21, 2021 5:23 pm

babyjax13 wrote:It was a monster of a draft.


funny how that works...almost everyone here except for a select few hated it.
User avatar
CptCrunch
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,290
And1: 4,364
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#6 » by CptCrunch » Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:47 pm

My big board on the Knicks forum:

CptCrunch wrote:1. Zion

2. Morant/Barrett

3. Culver/Hunter/Reddish/Washington


viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1838415&p=75320940&hilit=zion#p75320940

Pretty good aside from Culver ruining it. Keep in mind May 2019 was when a big portion of the media/board wanted Morant over Zion. This climaxed near the end of their rookie season when the vast majority of this forum preferred Morant over Zion.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 10,245
And1: 7,903
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#7 » by BlazersBroncos » Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:54 pm

I didnt expect him to vault up the draft boards but I surprised draftniks have not noticed how drastically improved Nassir Little has been this year. Still inconsistent, but looking like a NBA player if not a low usage 4/5th starter sometime in the future.
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,749
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#8 » by nolang1 » Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:34 pm

Covid and the bubble has really thrown things off with this draft where my assessment before the draft was probably more accurate than going into this season (remember when people were actually saying stuff like 'would you trade Tyler Herro for #1 in 2020?").

The one player where I'm probably most different than consensus would be Jaxson Hayes. He's still 20 and in a one-number metric like LEBRON the only 20-and-under players with a better rating from this draft are and Zion and Horton-Tucker (last year for 19-and-under players it was just Zion). Obviously that's not the end-all be-all for evaluating players, but I'd say that's pretty good for someone who's regarded as super raw with no clue what he's doing.

New Orleans isn't even a good fit for him since Zion is essentially a 5 on offense and is good enough that it's put the organization in more of a win-now mode where they've done stuff like trade a 1st for Steven Adams plus move Hernangomez ahead of Hayes in the rotation for a while because of one good game he had against the Kings, all to chase a play-in spot. Since his last DNP in early March Hayes is averaging 17.4 points and 8.8 rebounds per 36 while shooting 72.8% on twos and 81.3% on free throws in addition to being 3-7 on threes in that time. He's not some huge negative like you'd expect a super raw player to be and his shooting and foul avoidance are clearly trending in the right direction.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,011
And1: 18,087
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#9 » by NO-KG-AI » Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:57 pm

Brandon Clarke’s shine has gone down a lot hmm?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 39,217
And1: 36,979
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#10 » by zimpy27 » Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:12 pm

clyde21 wrote:this is a mix of what I thought before the draft (because it's still early) and what we've seen so far in the NBA

1 Zion Williamson
2 RJ Barrett
3 Ja Morant
4 DeAndre Hunter
5 Tyler Herro
6 Darius Garland
7 Keldon Johnson
8 Kevin Porter Jr.
9 Bol Bol
10 Coby White
11 P.J. Washington
12 Nicolas Claxton
13 Chuma Okeke
14 Nickeil Alexander-Walker
15 Brandon Clarke
16 Darius Bazley
17 Matisse Thybulle
18 Luguentz Dort
19 Talen Horton-Tucker
20 Rui Hachimura

biggest disappointment for me so far has been Sekou.


I agree mostly but probably have THT higher than Coby and Thybulle above Clarke. Bol Bol would be behind Dort for me.

I think Bol Bol might be your Anthony Randolph but fingers crossed that Malone is just easing him back like he did with MPJ.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 61,713
And1: 69,197
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
   

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#11 » by clyde21 » Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:00 am

zimpy27 wrote:I agree mostly but probably have THT higher than Coby and Thybulle above Clarke. Bol Bol would be behind Dort for me.

I think Bol Bol might be your Anthony Randolph but fingers crossed that Malone is just easing him back like he did with MPJ.


for sure, was always high risk high reward, but thats a bet I'm willing to take in that class every day after Zion.

that's a crowded front court tho with Jokic, Millsap, Green, MPJ, they drafted Zeke too and just added Gordon on top it...not a lot of mins to go around tbh but I've liked what I've seen when he's been on the court.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 39,217
And1: 36,979
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#12 » by zimpy27 » Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:13 am

It seems like most are firm on Ja as the second pick. I could easily see him slipping out of top 5 in a couple years as his 3 shooting looks like an issue.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#13 » by Stillwater » Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:54 am

I think its still a bit early but some are obviously developing faster than others...
example I think the jury is still way out on Sekou who hasnt had a real pg and is in a giant dumpster fire
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 1,427
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#14 » by ecuhus1981 » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:42 am

Stillwater wrote:I think its still a bit early but some are obviously developing faster than others...
example I think the jury is still way out on Sekou who hasnt had a real pg and is in a giant dumpster fire

I mean, some would argue that Sekou is accelerant for that dumpster fire...

Point taken.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#15 » by Stillwater » Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:27 pm

ecuhus1981 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:I think its still a bit early but some are obviously developing faster than others...
example I think the jury is still way out on Sekou who hasnt had a real pg and is in a giant dumpster fire

I mean, some would argue that Sekou is accelerant for that dumpster fire...

Point taken.

Sekou has been a massive disappointment so far but imo there is no chance the same thing happens if the spurs or the warriors draft him.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 10,245
And1: 7,903
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#16 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:18 pm

Sekou doesnt look athletic at all to me when I watch him. He doesnt make smart decisions and he doesnt have the shot to offset his mediocre athleticism. He seems to play wildly out of control and isnt the type to forget his mistakes quickly, letting them affect other areas of his game. He is in a situation on a bad team that should be very conducive to high mpg but he isnt cracking 20. Its been a rough run so far.
User avatar
Roger Murdock
RealGM
Posts: 11,884
And1: 4,658
Joined: Aug 12, 2008
 

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#17 » by Roger Murdock » Thu Apr 22, 2021 5:44 pm

zimpy27 wrote:It seems like most are firm on Ja as the second pick. I could easily see him slipping out of top 5 in a couple years as his 3 shooting looks like an issue.


I could easily see Garland and Barrett passing him but who else? He’s too athletic and dynamic to not end up top 5 IMO. Even someone real nice all around like Hunter doesn’t have the upside to surpass him I don’t think
shakes0
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,349
And1: 4,962
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#18 » by shakes0 » Thu Apr 22, 2021 6:12 pm

Roger Murdock wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:It seems like most are firm on Ja as the second pick. I could easily see him slipping out of top 5 in a couple years as his 3 shooting looks like an issue.


I could easily see Garland and Barrett passing him but who else? He’s too athletic and dynamic to not end up top 5 IMO. Even someone real nice all around like Hunter doesn’t have the upside to surpass him I don’t think


Before passing Ja, Garland and Barrett would first have to pass Hunter.

Hunter is at worst #3 in this draft behind Zion and Ja and could be ahead of Ja in the near future.
CP War Hawks
Analyst
Posts: 3,106
And1: 1,434
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
     

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#19 » by CP War Hawks » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:12 pm

shakes0 wrote:
Roger Murdock wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:It seems like most are firm on Ja as the second pick. I could easily see him slipping out of top 5 in a couple years as his 3 shooting looks like an issue.


I could easily see Garland and Barrett passing him but who else? He’s too athletic and dynamic to not end up top 5 IMO. Even someone real nice all around like Hunter doesn’t have the upside to surpass him I don’t think


Before passing Ja, Garland and Barrett would first have to pass Hunter.

Hunter is at worst #3 in this draft behind Zion and Ja and could be ahead of Ja in the near future.


I could give an 1a 1b for either Hunter and RJ in a vacuum. RJ is having a good season. But I take the 6-8 guy with the 7-2 wingspan that offers a different ceiling on both ends.
User avatar
Roger Murdock
RealGM
Posts: 11,884
And1: 4,658
Joined: Aug 12, 2008
 

Re: Re-Assessing the 2019 Draft 

Post#20 » by Roger Murdock » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:38 pm

Hunter doesn’t offer the offensive upside of Barrett or Garland. He’s played half the season and is 2 years older. Who cares if he’s marginally better right now. Garland has more dynamic scoring/ball handling/playmaking. Barrett is an all around stud on the wing. Hunters great but he’s a lower usage high efficiency guy rather than someone you can run a team through. I think the Hawks would definitely take him over Garland because it’s a better fit for their team but the Knicks and Cavs would prefer their guys.

Return to NBA Draft