People were interested in these podcasts

Who slides, and why?

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 34,823
And1: 17,341
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Occupied Los Angeles
     

Who slides, and why? 

Post#1 » by babyjax13 » Tue Jun 13, 2023 6:30 am

Most years we see someone projected top 10-12 slide a few picks. Last year, Duren was projected top 10 in a lot of places and went 13th, and AJ Griffin was another player many had in the lottery who slid to 15th: https://www.nba.com/news/2022-consensus-mock-draft

This is the current top-10 on the hoopshype composite mock draft. Who slides, and why?
https://ftw.usatoday.com/lists/nba-mock-draft-2023-consensus-victor-wembanyama

1. Victor Wembenyama
2. Brandon Miller
3. Scoot Henderson
4. Amen Thompson
5. Cam Whitmore
6. Jarace Walker
7. Ausar Thompson
8. Taylor Hendricks
9. Anthony Black
10. Grady Dick
(11. Cason Wallace)
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 34,823
And1: 17,341
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Occupied Los Angeles
     

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#2 » by babyjax13 » Tue Jun 13, 2023 6:33 am

This is me reading *WAY* too much into who is REPORTED to work out and where, but my guess would be Ausar Thompson. Hoopshype's tracker has him working out with two teams so far, Portland and Charlotte. They also have him working out with the only teams reported to have worked out Amen. Because of the competition level in OTE, I could see a lot of teams in the 9-14 range (who I think are all hoping to make the playoffs) deciding to pick guys they feel more confident about. Could Ausar also be angling to slide down a bit so a team that picks Amen can also grab a later lottery pick?

The easy answer here, though, is Grady Dick --- and that's because Cason Wallace is, IMO, a better prospect, and Dick feels like a poor fit in Dallas (even though they worked him out).
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
BostonCouchGM
Head Coach
Posts: 6,714
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 07, 2018

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#3 » by BostonCouchGM » Tue Jun 13, 2023 6:46 am

Dick has no business being taken in the lottery. Since he's mocked in the top 10 a lot he could slide compared to mocks but it wouldn't really be a slide as far as his talent and where he should go.
User avatar
Nuntius
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,857
And1: 22,956
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
   

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#4 » by Nuntius » Tue Jun 13, 2023 6:47 am

Gradey Dick probably goes #11 to Orlando. It just makes way too much sense for it not to happen. Orlando needs shooting and they already have an even better lotto pick. I don't really consider that a drop, though, Gradey has been mocked at #11 in several other mocks.

I really don't believe that my Pacers are going to draft Ausar at #7 so I'd say that he's the one who slides based on the mock in the OP.
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."

She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 34,823
And1: 17,341
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Occupied Los Angeles
     

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#5 » by babyjax13 » Tue Jun 13, 2023 6:57 am

Nuntius wrote:Gradey Dick probably goes #11 to Orlando. It just makes way too much sense for it not to happen. Orlando needs shooting and they already have an even better lotto pick. I don't really consider that a drop, though, Gradey has been mocked at #11 in several other mocks.

I really don't believe that my Pacers are going to draft Ausar at #7 so I'd say that he's the one who slides based on the mock in the OP.


FWIW the OP is just an average of several mock drafts.

I could see Dick dropping. Great shooter, good off-ball cutter. No on-ball creation, poor defender. I think you can find what Grady Dick offers for an MLE type deal.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,459
And1: 2,151
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#6 » by Village Idiot » Tue Jun 13, 2023 10:55 am

I'll go with Whitmore. Black hole offensively and a bit undersized. I can see Coulibaly moving past him pushing Whitmore outside the top 10. Can also see some team picking Lively ahead of him.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 35,847
And1: 13,887
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#7 » by basketballRob » Tue Jun 13, 2023 12:53 pm

The Thompsons. Poor shooting and lack of elite competition.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Nuntius
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,857
And1: 22,956
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
   

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#8 » by Nuntius » Tue Jun 13, 2023 1:22 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
Nuntius wrote:Gradey Dick probably goes #11 to Orlando. It just makes way too much sense for it not to happen. Orlando needs shooting and they already have an even better lotto pick. I don't really consider that a drop, though, Gradey has been mocked at #11 in several other mocks.

I really don't believe that my Pacers are going to draft Ausar at #7 so I'd say that he's the one who slides based on the mock in the OP.


FWIW the OP is just an average of several mock drafts.


Ah, I see. I do think that the spots make sense then.

babyjax13 wrote:I could see Dick dropping. Great shooter, good off-ball cutter. No on-ball creation, poor defender. I think you can find what Grady Dick offers for an MLE type deal.


I could see it if Orlando wasn't at #11. Given the fact that they already have a higher pick at #6 and that they really, really need a shooter, I think that this is where Gradey goes.
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."

She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,666
And1: 4,694
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#9 » by CptCrunch » Tue Jun 13, 2023 2:16 pm

Village Idiot wrote:I'll go with Whitmore. Black hole offensively and a bit undersized. I can see Coulibaly moving past him pushing Whitmore outside the top 10. Can also see some team picking Lively ahead of him.


Hard disagree on Whitmore. Think he is fall proof really until 8 or so.

Yes he is a bit small for a PF. Sure he is a blackhole on offense, but his outlier talents on offense is simply too much in terms of self creation, being above rim player and absolutely stellar priors high school makes him a can't miss prospect.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,558
And1: 69,983
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#10 » by clyde21 » Tue Jun 13, 2023 3:52 pm

Whitmore is not dropping below 9
SeattleJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,317
And1: 2,707
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#11 » by SeattleJazzFan » Tue Jun 13, 2023 3:55 pm

clyde21 wrote:Whitmore is not dropping below 9


yup. no chance the jazz pass on him if he's there.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,497
And1: 4,009
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#12 » by EvanZ » Tue Jun 13, 2023 5:43 pm

CptCrunch wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:I'll go with Whitmore. Black hole offensively and a bit undersized. I can see Coulibaly moving past him pushing Whitmore outside the top 10. Can also see some team picking Lively ahead of him.


Hard disagree on Whitmore. Think he is fall proof really until 8 or so.

Yes he is a bit small for a PF. Sure he is a blackhole on offense, but his outlier talents on offense is simply too much in terms of self creation, being above rim player and absolutely stellar priors high school makes him a can't miss prospect.


I don't really see any "outlier" talents. Honestly he kind of just reminds me of Okoro without the passing.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
treefi
Analyst
Posts: 3,545
And1: 836
Joined: Jul 11, 2002
Contact:

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#13 » by treefi » Tue Jun 13, 2023 6:38 pm

Village Idiot wrote:I'll go with Whitmore. Black hole offensively and a bit undersized. I can see Coulibaly moving past him pushing Whitmore outside the top 10. Can also see some team picking Lively ahead of him.


I don't think he'll drop outside the top 10, but I am surprised nobody ever seems to comment on his below average (by NBA standards) wingspan. Were we not expecting close to 7'0"? :-? Is he below average wingspan for an NBA SF at 6'8"? Take away his athleticism and strength advantage every game (for his whole life up until next year) and I have some concerns, especially about that whole "black hole" thing.

As for who drops, I'll go with Amen Thompson if Houston passes. Outside the top 10 is tough though. From that list I see Anthony Black, Grady Dick, Cason Wallace, Ausar Thompson as more likely to go outside the top 10.
treefi
Analyst
Posts: 3,545
And1: 836
Joined: Jul 11, 2002
Contact:

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#14 » by treefi » Tue Jun 13, 2023 6:46 pm

EvanZ wrote:
CptCrunch wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:I'll go with Whitmore. Black hole offensively and a bit undersized. I can see Coulibaly moving past him pushing Whitmore outside the top 10. Can also see some team picking Lively ahead of him.


Hard disagree on Whitmore. Think he is fall proof really until 8 or so.

Yes he is a bit small for a PF. Sure he is a blackhole on offense, but his outlier talents on offense is simply too much in terms of self creation, being above rim player and absolutely stellar priors high school makes him a can't miss prospect.


I don't really see any "outlier" talents. Honestly he kind of just reminds me of Okoro without the passing.


The one thing that sticks with me about Whitmore is how better he was from NBA 3 distance at Villanova than Brandon Miller at Alabama. If he's a knockout 3 point shooter in the NBA, I'm fully on board the train... But I'm not convinced he is or will be, and nobody else seems to be either.

If he wasn't one of the top high school prospects in the country, would he be a projected lottery pick right now?
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,497
And1: 4,009
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#15 » by EvanZ » Tue Jun 13, 2023 7:32 pm

treefi wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
CptCrunch wrote:
Hard disagree on Whitmore. Think he is fall proof really until 8 or so.

Yes he is a bit small for a PF. Sure he is a blackhole on offense, but his outlier talents on offense is simply too much in terms of self creation, being above rim player and absolutely stellar priors high school makes him a can't miss prospect.


I don't really see any "outlier" talents. Honestly he kind of just reminds me of Okoro without the passing.


The one thing that sticks with me about Whitmore is how better he was from NBA 3 distance at Villanova than Brandon Miller at Alabama. If he's a knockout 3 point shooter in the NBA, I'm fully on board the train... But I'm not convinced he is or will be, and nobody else seems to be either.

If he wasn't one of the top high school prospects in the country, would he be a projected lottery pick right now?


Please give me the stats on this. How many attempts are we talking here? I'm not sure why I'm even bothering with this, because even if every 3 he took this season was an NBA 3 it would still be a small sample.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 35,847
And1: 13,887
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#16 » by basketballRob » Tue Jun 13, 2023 11:22 pm

Whitmore can guard SG/SF. I'm not sure why people keep calling him a PF.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,238
And1: 9,771
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#17 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Jun 13, 2023 11:36 pm

I have a feeling both Thompsons fall out of the Top-10.
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,666
And1: 4,694
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#18 » by CptCrunch » Wed Jun 14, 2023 2:17 am

EvanZ wrote:
treefi wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
I don't really see any "outlier" talents. Honestly he kind of just reminds me of Okoro without the passing.


The one thing that sticks with me about Whitmore is how better he was from NBA 3 distance at Villanova than Brandon Miller at Alabama. If he's a knockout 3 point shooter in the NBA, I'm fully on board the train... But I'm not convinced he is or will be, and nobody else seems to be either.

If he wasn't one of the top high school prospects in the country, would he be a projected lottery pick right now?


Please give me the stats on this. How many attempts are we talking here? I'm not sure why I'm even bothering with this, because even if every 3 he took this season was an NBA 3 it would still be a small sample.


There isn't a lot of evidence that Brandon Miller is some elite shooter really. The stat just isn't there. There is a good case to say that he went on a mini hot streak for 15 games mid-season then regressed to his true skill.

In fact, if we plotted Whitmore against Miller and looked at their backwards looking 7 game rolling averages, we can also see a Whitmore bump in the middle of the season. During late season against better teams, they should about the same from 3. Miller is years and half older than Whitmore. I'm just going to guess that Whitmore will match Miller's current shooting skills in about a year. Blah blah, you can tell me about shot volume; that's why we are looking at rolling 7 game averages to pool sample sizes together. Whitmore's credible interval band actually has a higher center than B. Miller's really near the end of the season.

Blue = rolling 7 game average fitted with locally weighted smoothing
Red = 80% Bayesian credible interval with a diffuse prior (an estimate of a player's true skill based on recent performance). This is over the whole season from all shots up to the game listed.

Image

Here is a bonus plot for our boy A. Black vs his closest competitor Cason Wallace, who might mistakently be taken above him. But at least Cason is a good PG prospect. Cason literally went on to become a brick lord late in the season. When a player's game performance enters regions outside of interval, just indicates outlier performance, in Cason's case outlier bad performance on very small volumes.

Image
User avatar
Chuck Everett
RealGM
Posts: 19,069
And1: 21,756
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#19 » by Chuck Everett » Wed Jun 14, 2023 2:55 am

This lottery is a complete crapshoot. If the rumor mill is to believed, a lot of these teams don't like the players in the mid-lottery range anymore than guys in teens to twenties. That's not normal. If trades aren't made, could be some surprises. I still think Dereck Lively II is an elite rim protector/rim runner and not going in the lottery is stupid. The same way it was that Walker Kessler didn't go lotto. Teams still need size on the back-line.

As an example, if I was Washington and I really was bringing back Kuzma, Beal and Porzingis, then I would take Lively to pair him with Gafford as a 1-2 punch at the 5. I think that actually improves the roster. Same with Indiana as Turner can play away from the basket out to the 3. Lively is a switchable big.

Just seems really weird that because Duke didn't know how to use him, he is being penalized for it. He looked elite at guarding the rim to me.
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
BostonCouchGM
Head Coach
Posts: 6,714
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 07, 2018

Re: Who slides, and why? 

Post#20 » by BostonCouchGM » Wed Jun 14, 2023 7:12 am

Chuck Everett wrote:This lottery is a complete crapshoot. If the rumor mill is to believed, a lot of these teams don't like the players in the mid-lottery range anymore than guys in teens to twenties. That's not normal. If trades aren't made, could be some surprises. I still think Dereck Lively II is an elite rim protector/rim runner and not going in the lottery is stupid. The same way it was that Walker Kessler didn't go lotto. Teams still need size on the back-line.

As an example, if I was Washington and I really was bringing back Kuzma, Beal and Porzingis, then I would take Lively to pair him with Gafford as a 1-2 punch at the 5. I think that actually improves the roster. Same with Indiana as Turner can play away from the basket out to the 3. Lively is a switchable big.

Just seems really weird that because Duke didn't know how to use him, he is being penalized for it. He looked elite at guarding the rim to me.


I expect a lot of teams to want to move because draft positions, team needs and talent left on the board won't align. I think teams don't like the talent anywhere except for at the top which is why they'll want to move down or out but I'm not seeing anyone who would be willing to move up that will pay the price to do so. Wizards have the perfect opportunity to blow it up since they'll lose Kuzma and Porzingis. Might as well trade Beal just to get out from under his contract (if anyone is willing which I doubt) so they can play their kids and try to develop them. If none of them can play it won't matter because the goal is to tank anyway. If I was a Wizards fan I'd be more excited about the prospect of watching Avdija, Kispert, Davis and Lively than running it back as is. They really just have to finally embrace the tank. It could be a quick rebuild since they do potentially have some compelling talent.

Return to NBA Draft