Stats drawn from Basketball Reference, Hoop-Math, and Evan Miya. Points, assists, rebounds, steals and blocks are all per 40 minutes.
Vitals

Since I’m including basically any plausible wing here there’s a wide range of sizes here. 6’4” in shoes is generally an acceptable height for SGs but Spencer and Jones aren’t very long either. Alexander is on the short side for the position but has an inordinately long wingspan. I listed Hinson and Ingram as potential PFs given the former’s weight and the latter’s terrible footspeed, but obviously they’d both be quite undersized for that position. Furphy and George could theoretically grow into being playable as PFs but are currently fairly skinny.
Age wise there are a ton of old seniors, but Isaiah Crawford, Dillon Jones and David Jones are all young for their college class. Christie is very young period. Justin Edwards and Kyshawn George are sophomore aged freshmen, which diminishes both their value.
Given that I already discussed Spencer, Larsson, Castle, Alexander, McCuller and Dillon Jones in the PG thread, I’ll avoid saying much more on them. They’re included here because they could plausibly play on the wing so it’s worth seeing how they add up compared to other wings.
Overall Offense

We have a wide range of roles played by these guys in college and therefore a wide range of basic stats. Freshman usually do poorly in impact stats compared to seniors for obvious reasons, I’m not too concerned by George, Christie and Furphy being rated low in them, but it is weird to see seniors down there and speaks poorly to their offensive game and NBA potential. Especially weird for floor spacers to not have a big positive offensive impact, looking at you Jaylen Wells. Knecht also doesn’t rate as high as one would expect here.
Attacking the basket

In this section you should see a bit of a sliding scale from more forward type players to more guard type players, mainly centered around their % assisted, with % of FGA at the rim being more a statement on whether or not the guy can shoot at all. I would be suspicious of any guy who isn’t shooting 60% at the rim, especially non-freshmen. Freshmen can at least be excused by still being skinny teenagers, but older guys have no excuses not to finish well – so be worried about Tyson, Daniels, Knecht, Flanigan, Ingram, Alexander, George and Wells. Daniels is especially disappointing given that he’s a good athlete playing in a weak conference.
In contrast to George and Walter, Furphy and Williams were excellent finishers. Williams showed at least some ability to create his own shot, while Furphy finished and drew fouls at freakish rates. Walter also apparently has an incredible knack for getting calls despite rarely driving to the hoop – if he can sustain that free throw rate he should quit settling for jumpers and drive like a maniac. Furphy was also an effective offensive rebounder for a skinny freshmen.
The real winner of this section is Shannon, as anyone who has watched him play would have guessed. One of the highest FTA/2PA I recall seeing, and excellent finishing. Despite his age this talent is very interesting. Other guys who were effective at creating their own shots at the basket include Isaiah Crawford, Dillon Jones, David Jones, Blake Hinson and Baylor Scheierman. Hinson and Shannon are really the only two guys who did this at a high volume however.
Among the group of guys who mostly aren’t creating their own shots, the guys who were most effective were Furphy, Brooks, Bridges, and Williams, as well as the previously discussed Larsson and McCullar.
Shooting

This is what a lot of you are here for. Lots of capable shooters in this class. Only Johnson, Flanigan, McCullar and Dillon Jones appear sure things to not be able to shoot in the league. Everyone else either shot well enough from the line or improved enough as seniors to be at least plausible. Hinson and Ingram are weird in that they’ve shot well from 3 but poorly from the line and have real track records, so it’s hard to say which one will be more predictive of their NBA shooting. Williams, Crawford, Daniels, Larsson and Tyson all are a bit low volume given their effectiveness, which calls into question how confident they are in their jumpers. Spencer, Wells, George, Christie, Scheierman, da Silva, Reeves, Knecht, and Bridges are sure to be good shooters in the NBA. Among them, take special note of Christie since he makes so many off the dribble.
Passing

Unsurprisingly, the guys I looked at as PGs are on top here, so leaving aside Larsson, Spencer, Alexander, Castle, McCullar and Dillon Jones, the standouts who are adding to the offense with their passing are Scheierman, Christie, and Miller. Ingram and Wells showed some good brains as low volume passers with good A/TOs. Tyson and Flanigan are alos too TO prone given how much they handled the ball. George clearly likes to pass but is currently very turnover prone. Anyone with an A/To below 1 who is aspiring to play on the wing is a problem however – bad news for Crawford, Williams, Brooks, Hinson, Daniels and David Jones. Walters and Knecht both barely scrape over the 1 assist per TO, and remain suspect. Shannon, Furphy and Edwards are all also pretty poor passers. A/To is also more than just an indicator of passing, it’s a generally good predictor of whether or not a guy is going to be good, so place extra weight on it when thinking about who will turn out.
Defense

Again, steals area great predictor of more than just defense, so they’re the most important number here – I consider less than 1 steal per40 to be a huge red flag for a wing. That’s another mark against Knecht, Williams, Christie, Wells, Brooks, Reeves and Hinson (yikes). Crawford Daniels and both Jones have elite steal rates, but clearly are benefiting from playing weaker competition, and I’d only expect Crawford to be a positive defender in the NBA.
I consider blocks to be a more of a ‘nice to have’ than something really important for wings, and I wouldn’t consider them too much for guys with poor steal rates. Rebounds and Blocks are worth considering not just for what they say about a guy’s defense, but how ‘big’ they play. Tall guys who don’t get defensive rebounds are a problem, and undersized guys who can rebound are more likely to be playable.
Oddly, a number of the guys evaluated as PGs are near the top of this list in DBRM – Dillon Jones is the lowest rated of that group of six and he’s near the middle of the pack. Scheieman somehow is the top wing of the remainder in the advanced plus/minus impact stat despite a bad steal rate. Presumably his elite defensive rebounding is having a real impact. Jones and Daniels also rebound at absurd levels, but are taking advantage of playing in low-major conferences. Ingram is the next best rated, with good steal/block/rebound rates as a consequence of his strength and absurdly long arms, but it’s still questionable if a guy as unathletic as him can make it in the NBA.
Hinson, Brooks, Reeves and Christie look to be unplayably-bad on defense.
Totals

Scheierman is apparently pretty good. Daniels is not. Christie, George and Furphy are probably going to take some time to come good. I’ll most leave these numbers to speak for themselves.