Page 1 of 1
OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 4:14 pm
by azcatz11
Curious what you all think about this
?s=46
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 7:39 pm
by babyjax13
I'd have UConn over Kansas and Villanova over Louisville, but historically Kansas probably has a good argument to be in that top tier.
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 8:14 pm
by SeattleJazzFan
stupid not to have duke in the top tier. and i hate duke.
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 9:04 pm
by babyjax13
SeattleJazzFan wrote:stupid not to have duke in the top tier. and i hate duke.
Somehow my brain just transposed them there, agree. Tier one should be:
Kentucky, Duke, UNC + maybe UConn and/or Kansas
Tier 2 should be
Kansas, UCLA, Indiana + maybe Villanova
Tier 3 is probably wide open for argument.
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 9:36 pm
by clyde21
Not sure why UCLA is still considered a blue blood at this point...
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2024 11:09 pm
by azcatz11
babyjax13 wrote:SeattleJazzFan wrote:stupid not to have duke in the top tier. and i hate duke.
Somehow my brain just transposed them there, agree. Tier one should be:
Kentucky, Duke, UNC + maybe UConn and/or Kansas
Tier 2 should be
Kansas, UCLA, Indiana + maybe Villanova
Tier 3 is probably wide open for argument.
Tier 1
Kentucky, Duke, UNC, Kansas, UConn
Tier 2
UCLA, Indiana
Tier 3
Syracuse, Michigan St, Villanova
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 7:06 pm
by Duke4life831
UCONN has replaced UCLA as a blue blood.
Duke, UK, KU, UNC, and UCONN are the blue bloods.
And the tier ranking really will just depend on the certain year.
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2024 1:05 am
by TYO
Duke should be in tier 1 and I’m saying that as a KU guy.
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2024 1:27 am
by isiah_thomas
Duke not in tier 1 means this list is bad
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 6:48 pm
by shakes0
babyjax13 wrote:SeattleJazzFan wrote:stupid not to have duke in the top tier. and i hate duke.
Somehow my brain just transposed them there, agree. Tier one should be:
Kentucky, Duke, UNC + maybe UConn and/or Kansas
Tier 2 should be
Kansas, UCLA, Indiana + maybe Villanova
Tier 3 is probably wide open for argument.
I HATE Kansas and you are severely underrating them here. They are 100% top tier and may in fact be the top blue blood of all the blue bloods.
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2024 6:51 pm
by shakes0
Duke may in fact be the team that is overrated here. Look at the traditional Blue Bloods....duke, Kansas, UNC, Kentucky, UCLA, Indiana.
What do the 5 teams not named Duke have in common? They've all proven they can win with different coaches. Duke has exactly ZERO national titles without Coach K. Let's just see how that program shakes out over the next decade or so. They might be on the way down in the tier list.
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2024 3:19 pm
by Big J
Is IU still living off their reputation from the 80s? Gonzaga is more of a blue blood than them at this point.
Re: OT: Do you agree with these blue blood rankings?
Posted: Fri Sep 6, 2024 2:28 am
by wegotthabeet
babyjax13 wrote:SeattleJazzFan wrote:stupid not to have duke in the top tier. and i hate duke.
Somehow my brain just transposed them there, agree. Tier one should be:
Kentucky, Duke, UNC + maybe UConn and/or Kansas
Tier 2 should be
Kansas, UCLA, Indiana + maybe Villanova
Tier 3 is probably wide open for argument.
tier 1 & tier 2 should just be tier 1.