Page 1 of 1

Lopez twins to declare for draft

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:54 pm
by A.J.
heard it on espn news

Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:56 pm
by Ruzious
Wow, I think it would be a big mistake for Robin. Obviously, Brook should go.

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 12:26 am
by MalReyn
Robin could certainly use another year of experience, and being the man at Stanford next year would be ideal for him.

Regardless though he'll be drafted in the first round.

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 1:52 am
by Cammo101
Robin can always go back if need be. I'm sure he wants to go pro when his brother does. I agree Robin could use another year at Stanford as the go to player.

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 2:04 am
by Texas Longhorns
They will both suck in the NBA.

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 2:12 am
by MYoung23
Their mother said both will be hiring agents.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008 ... id=3322897

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 2:47 am
by JonathanG
not a big surprise, we've been talking about this for a while now.

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 3:06 am
by legacyinthemakin89c
good for brook, dumb for robin

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 4:02 am
by Cammo101
Texas Longhorns wrote:They will both suck in the NBA.


Your nuts if you think Brook will not be a very good player in the NBA. He is a skilled 7 footer with game on both ends who is NBA ready as a sophmore. That combo does not happen very often.

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 5:48 am
by Nolan
Brook should go, Robin should stay. But both can be very sucessful in the NBA.

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 12:41 pm
by BigSlam
It would have been nice to see what Robin could do at Stanford being "the man" and with a little more refinment I think he had a chance to turn out better than Brook, but as it stands Brook is a top ten pick (maybe even top 5) and Robin is a 1st rounder...........so why not?

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 4:41 pm
by nyk2423
Good move by both.Because Brook is a top10pick and I dont think Robin can take being the man

Posted: Tue Apr 1, 2008 7:51 pm
by Texas Longhorns
Cammo101 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Your nuts if you think Brook will not be a very good player in the NBA. He is a skilled 7 footer with game on both ends who is NBA ready as a sophmore. That combo does not happen very often.


I'm not nuts. That's my opinion of them.

Posted: Thu Apr 3, 2008 4:32 pm
by DaGoodz
I'm just wary about twins from Stanford. I'm a wait and see with both of them, I don't think they will do much in the NBA. But we'll see

Posted: Thu Apr 3, 2008 11:30 pm
by M-Town's Finest
Cammo101 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Your nuts if you think Brook will not be a very good player in the NBA. He is a skilled 7 footer with game on both ends who is NBA ready as a sophmore. That combo does not happen very often.


Why do you insult people when they post something you don't agree with? What are you, 12? Brook hasn't shown that he has game on both ends at an NBA level, so it's all up for debate. Getting only 9 double doubles out of 27 contests is not all that great, for example. Especially when you consider that he is 7 foot 260 lbs. He was only an above average defender, another concern for someone with his size and supposed athleticism. How will his defense and rebounding translate to the NBA? It's anyone's guess, but we've seen plenty of players with those same red flags flop in the NBA.