http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=3390695
BREAKING NEWS, OJ Mayo took money!!
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus
BREAKING NEWS, OJ Mayo took money!!
-
ljp24
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,489
- And1: 22
- Joined: Nov 12, 2007
BREAKING NEWS, OJ Mayo took money!!
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=3390695
- moocow007
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 98,271
- And1: 25,730
- Joined: Jan 07, 2002
- Location: In front of the computer, where else?
-
Mayo should be fine. USC OTOH? Derozan hasn't officially committed to USC has he?
Subscribe to NBNF!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW9GUVpNULS97PyptXXU4w
- BMF Jet Jaguar
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,341
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 31, 2007
-
Blame Rasho
- On Leave
- Posts: 42,377
- And1: 10,154
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
- Troubadour
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,613
- And1: 8,549
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Toronto
-
-
Billy
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 12,623
- And1: 161
- Joined: Aug 14, 2001
-
nitetrain8603 wrote:If I read it correctly, USC had nothing to do with the money though. I honestly don't believe they should have to pay for it. Keep this in mind, Floyd wasn't even recruiting OJ. OJ just came to him.
That's the thing though. They never do. U$C has figured out exactly where not to look. They may as well make their motto "Ignorance is Bliss" because that is basically how they operate. So far it's worked, and the NCAA has gone ahead and enabled Teflon U to continue what they do.
To me, they either need to be punished for not taking action to stop this kind of thing, or need to be punished for not looking in the first place. That is really what it comes down to. They either weren't looking, or they looked the other way.
I know that every sports program in America is likely to have issues if people decide to look close enough. But you also have a lot of programs that work a hell of a lot harder than U$C to try to keep clean.
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 44,311
- And1: 20,488
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
- shawngoat23
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,622
- And1: 287
- Joined: Apr 17, 2008
USC has had nothing to do with it. The NCAA regulations are supposed to prevent buying of recruits. Even assuming USC could constantly monitor Mayo (which might very well be illegal), they get no recruiting benefit from some agent paying him money after he matriculated. In fact, they lose out, because that entices him to leave earlier.
Let's take a look at the parties involved:
- Mayo: Received a few thousand dollars. No penalty will be levied against him.
- Bill Duffy Associates: Tried to make some money off a college stud. The NCAA can't touch them.
- Johnson: Wanted to cash out on a childhood friend. Failed to do so, and instead resorted to blackmail. He'll be protected too.
- USC: Conducted a thorough investigation in good faith on Mayo, along with the Pac-10 and NCAA and found nothing. Earned no recruiting advantage or financial benefit from the alleged transactions. Does benefit to the extent that Mayo benefits the exposure of the team, but this has nothing to do with the allegations. But in this situation, everyone is crying for the university to receive the death penalty?
Sure, if the money was given by a USC booster, one could very well justify levying significant punishment against the university for lack of institutional control. But the money in this case comes from an agent, whose interests are completely opposite that of the university.
Let's take a look at the parties involved:
- Mayo: Received a few thousand dollars. No penalty will be levied against him.
- Bill Duffy Associates: Tried to make some money off a college stud. The NCAA can't touch them.
- Johnson: Wanted to cash out on a childhood friend. Failed to do so, and instead resorted to blackmail. He'll be protected too.
- USC: Conducted a thorough investigation in good faith on Mayo, along with the Pac-10 and NCAA and found nothing. Earned no recruiting advantage or financial benefit from the alleged transactions. Does benefit to the extent that Mayo benefits the exposure of the team, but this has nothing to do with the allegations. But in this situation, everyone is crying for the university to receive the death penalty?
Sure, if the money was given by a USC booster, one could very well justify levying significant punishment against the university for lack of institutional control. But the money in this case comes from an agent, whose interests are completely opposite that of the university.
-
Devin 1L
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 15,143
- And1: 969
- Joined: Jun 11, 2003
-
Billy wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That's the thing though. They never do. U$C has figured out exactly where not to look. They may as well make their motto "Ignorance is Bliss" because that is basically how they operate. So far it's worked, and the NCAA has gone ahead and enabled Teflon U to continue what they do.
To me, they either need to be punished for not taking action to stop this kind of thing, or need to be punished for not looking in the first place. That is really what it comes down to. They either weren't looking, or they looked the other way.
I know that every sports program in America is likely to have issues if people decide to look close enough. But you also have a lot of programs that work a hell of a lot harder than U$C to try to keep clean.
Isn't this basically what happened with OU football in the Rhett Bomar/JD Quinn fiasco?
It seems a little vague, but I believe they got in trouble because they weren't doing their part in "monitoring", or looking for stuff like this. Essentially they weren't in trouble for actually doing something, but rather for their negligence in not doing something when they should have been. I could be wrong though.

























