BREAKING NEWS, OJ Mayo took money!!

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

ljp24
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,489
And1: 22
Joined: Nov 12, 2007

BREAKING NEWS, OJ Mayo took money!! 

Post#1 » by ljp24 » Sun May 11, 2008 3:48 pm

:roll: :roll: raise your hand if you didn't think he was taking money. I don't blame him anyways. He didnt benefit at all from the 1-year rule.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=3390695
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,271
And1: 25,730
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#2 » by moocow007 » Sun May 11, 2008 4:15 pm

Mayo should be fine. USC OTOH? Derozan hasn't officially committed to USC has he?
streetp0et
Rookie
Posts: 1,213
And1: 99
Joined: Jul 18, 2003
Contact:
   

 

Post#3 » by streetp0et » Sun May 11, 2008 5:19 pm

what a punk. snitching only when he's been ousted from the inner circle and have no chance of benefiting from mayo's success.
User avatar
BMF Jet Jaguar
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,341
And1: 1
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#4 » by BMF Jet Jaguar » Sun May 11, 2008 5:23 pm

yeah derozans committed.
Kobe wrote:Wasn't much of a battle tonight. I kicked his ass tonight.
Billy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,623
And1: 161
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
 

 

Post#5 » by Billy » Sun May 11, 2008 6:13 pm

USC's going to get a slap on the wrist.
User avatar
bigballa3jj
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,336
And1: 183
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#6 » by bigballa3jj » Sun May 11, 2008 6:16 pm

i can't lie, i'd prolly take the money too if i was in his position, its not like he was shaving points or anything. yea its still against the rules but i can't get on a guy for something i'd do too
mr.ankle
Banned User
Posts: 5,149
And1: 57
Joined: May 26, 2001

 

Post#7 » by mr.ankle » Sun May 11, 2008 6:39 pm

Well since he is gone . The NCAA can not do anything to him
User avatar
GYBE
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,000
And1: 358
Joined: Feb 14, 2005
Location: Kanada

 

Post#8 » by GYBE » Sun May 11, 2008 7:11 pm

Considering the Reggie Bush incident, it would be ridiculous if the NCAA didn't give USC a severe penalty. Forde wrote a pretty good article on it.

Link
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,928
And1: 2,034
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#9 » by Cammo101 » Sun May 11, 2008 7:18 pm

This is not surprisng at all. Lets see if USC even gets punished. They seem to be above the law now.
User avatar
Dexmor
Head Coach
Posts: 7,002
And1: 39
Joined: Jan 26, 2007

 

Post#10 » by Dexmor » Sun May 11, 2008 7:20 pm

They should be aloud to take money.
nitetrain8603
RealGM
Posts: 24,147
And1: 1,834
Joined: May 30, 2003
         

 

Post#11 » by nitetrain8603 » Sun May 11, 2008 7:36 pm

If I read it correctly, USC had nothing to do with the money though. I honestly don't believe they should have to pay for it. Keep this in mind, Floyd wasn't even recruiting OJ. OJ just came to him.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,377
And1: 10,154
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#12 » by Blame Rasho » Sun May 11, 2008 7:37 pm

USC should get the death penalty.
User avatar
Troubadour
RealGM
Posts: 14,613
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Toronto
 

 

Post#13 » by Troubadour » Sun May 11, 2008 8:03 pm

Who cares? His ex-friend is a b**ch for ratting him out, but that's life.
Billy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,623
And1: 161
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
 

 

Post#14 » by Billy » Sun May 11, 2008 9:42 pm

nitetrain8603 wrote:If I read it correctly, USC had nothing to do with the money though. I honestly don't believe they should have to pay for it. Keep this in mind, Floyd wasn't even recruiting OJ. OJ just came to him.


That's the thing though. They never do. U$C has figured out exactly where not to look. They may as well make their motto "Ignorance is Bliss" because that is basically how they operate. So far it's worked, and the NCAA has gone ahead and enabled Teflon U to continue what they do.

To me, they either need to be punished for not taking action to stop this kind of thing, or need to be punished for not looking in the first place. That is really what it comes down to. They either weren't looking, or they looked the other way.

I know that every sports program in America is likely to have issues if people decide to look close enough. But you also have a lot of programs that work a hell of a lot harder than U$C to try to keep clean.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 70,671
And1: 23,695
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

 

Post#15 » by Klomp » Sun May 11, 2008 10:43 pm

So does this affect his draft stock?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

 

Post#16 » by DanTown8587 » Sun May 11, 2008 11:32 pm

Reading the bottom line, the NCAA investigated Mayo before college and during and found nothing wrong. So I tend to side with the NCAA over some former friend bitter about not cashing in for the ride with Mayo.
...
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,311
And1: 20,488
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#17 » by NO-KG-AI » Mon May 12, 2008 1:16 am

Who cares, I would take money too.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
shawngoat23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 287
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

 

Post#18 » by shawngoat23 » Mon May 12, 2008 1:21 am

USC has had nothing to do with it. The NCAA regulations are supposed to prevent buying of recruits. Even assuming USC could constantly monitor Mayo (which might very well be illegal), they get no recruiting benefit from some agent paying him money after he matriculated. In fact, they lose out, because that entices him to leave earlier.

Let's take a look at the parties involved:
- Mayo: Received a few thousand dollars. No penalty will be levied against him.
- Bill Duffy Associates: Tried to make some money off a college stud. The NCAA can't touch them.
- Johnson: Wanted to cash out on a childhood friend. Failed to do so, and instead resorted to blackmail. He'll be protected too.
- USC: Conducted a thorough investigation in good faith on Mayo, along with the Pac-10 and NCAA and found nothing. Earned no recruiting advantage or financial benefit from the alleged transactions. Does benefit to the extent that Mayo benefits the exposure of the team, but this has nothing to do with the allegations. But in this situation, everyone is crying for the university to receive the death penalty?

Sure, if the money was given by a USC booster, one could very well justify levying significant punishment against the university for lack of institutional control. But the money in this case comes from an agent, whose interests are completely opposite that of the university.
Devin 1L
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,143
And1: 969
Joined: Jun 11, 2003
 

 

Post#19 » by Devin 1L » Mon May 12, 2008 6:26 am

Billy wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That's the thing though. They never do. U$C has figured out exactly where not to look. They may as well make their motto "Ignorance is Bliss" because that is basically how they operate. So far it's worked, and the NCAA has gone ahead and enabled Teflon U to continue what they do.

To me, they either need to be punished for not taking action to stop this kind of thing, or need to be punished for not looking in the first place. That is really what it comes down to. They either weren't looking, or they looked the other way.

I know that every sports program in America is likely to have issues if people decide to look close enough. But you also have a lot of programs that work a hell of a lot harder than U$C to try to keep clean.


Isn't this basically what happened with OU football in the Rhett Bomar/JD Quinn fiasco?

It seems a little vague, but I believe they got in trouble because they weren't doing their part in "monitoring", or looking for stuff like this. Essentially they weren't in trouble for actually doing something, but rather for their negligence in not doing something when they should have been. I could be wrong though.
User avatar
Turnpikebandit
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,998
And1: 300
Joined: Jul 30, 2002

 

Post#20 » by Turnpikebandit » Mon May 12, 2008 7:03 am

Congratulations to Forde for being the first writer to work in the "side of Mayo" reference effectively!

Return to NBA Draft