OT- Kidd to mavs

Magz50 · Post #21 » by **Magz50** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:27 pm

One thing that comes to mind is our own dealings to try and get Kidd when Parker was still trying to establish himself. Remember what happened there, Parker took it as a kick in the ass and proved everyone wrong. I'd assume Harris may do the same thing, he has alot of similarities to Parker and i'm sure he's taken this whole thing as a slap in the face.

pro2020 · Post #22 » by **pro2020** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 5:07 pm

yep, I was thinking the same thing, he could use it as motivation like Parker or it could go south and break him emotionally.

Blame Rasho · Post #23 » by **Blame Rasho** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:17 pm

Does Cuban know that he needs to run the trade thru our trade checker...

Anyways it was sheer stupidity what Stackhouse said... "Yeah... let me get 30 days off and then I will be back with the Mavs." Yeah... there is an understanding but you don't open your mouth and tell the AP about it. The Mavs are lucky that the NBA didn't take away picks due to him.

Post #24 » by **SD2042** » Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:57 am

The Mavs are very lucky alright. As for JKidd. I wouldn't be too surprised if he ended up elsewhere.

Blame Rasho · Post #25 » by **Blame Rasho** » Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:07 am

Well at least in my own mind they are better with Harris, but now they have alot of internal turmoil within their team. They aren't exactly the most mentally strong team there is... so i am very interested in how they do.

Blame Rasho · Post #26 » by **Blame Rasho** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:46 am

Well it is back on...lol

SMRattler · Post #27 » by **SMRattler** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:49 pm

Yup, it's back on. KVH turns out to be useful for something afterall. This might be his greatest accomplishment in the NBA.

Black_Jack21 · Post #28 » by **Black_Jack21** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:12 am

Haven't the nets tried the whole Van Horn thing before lol.
Well this seems to be a very strange move. I don't see how this makes them a better team.
Sure Kidd is one of the best PG's of the generation. But i don't see how he can guard some of the elite players in the west.
Nash, Parker, Paul, Williams. While being a little unpredictable, Harris gave them energy, a fiesty defender and really trouble Parker.
Kidd won't be able to come near parker.
They have emptied their bench and the given away their best option in guarding, TD, Gasol and STAT.
Sure they now have Kidd back and an upgrade at the point but this gamble would want to pay off this year, otherwise this deal is a dud.

Magz50 · Post #29 » by **Magz50** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:36 pm

It's a dud deal. Mavs fans will try to see the light but really they won't make any noise in the playoffs without a big man defender in the West.

Tiga · Post #30 » by **Tiga** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:22 pm

They are not done...
I hope

Tribbiani · Post #31 » by **Tribbiani** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:33 pm

Mavs waive Fazekas.

We must sign him!!!

Magz50 · Post #32 » by **Magz50** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:04 pm

Tribbiani · Post #33 » by **Tribbiani** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:26 pm

Magz50 wrote:why?

why not?

He

Blame Rasho · Post #34 » by **Blame Rasho** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:09 am

Quick question... as of today the Mavs were 35/18 with a .660 before the Harris/Kidd trade.... lets forget that they were 5/5 without him. Do they win at a better rate with Kidd in the lineup for the rest of the year.

Over or under their current .660 winning percentage.

Donald Kaufman · Post #35 » by **Donald Kaufman** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:12 am

TD is the MAN wrote:Quick question... as of today the Mavs were 35/18 with a .660 before the Harris/Kidd trade.... lets forget that they were 5/5 without him. Do they win at a better rate with Kidd in the lineup for the rest of the year.

Over or under their current .660 winning percentage.

Regular season: I can see them improving on the .660 win %

Playoffs: 1st or 2nd round elimination due to Kidd's deficiencies on D and lack of big man presence.