Spurs are officially 1 game back of first now. If we tie OKC, we get the #1 seed since beat them 2/3 this year.
Also, here are some interesting advanced stats from Hollinger about SA:
http://espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/playoffoddsRight now we have the highest odds of any team to get to the Finals at 37%.
Second highest championshop odds at 19.6%, just under OKC's 19.8% odds (likely they're higher only because they beat Miami and a shorthanded Chicago recently, and teams being shorthanded isn't factored into the equation)
And we're favored to get the #1 seed too at 56.1% to OKC's 43.9%.
Interesting stats. So 37% chance at title (basically about 3/8 if you want it in fraction form), 56% chance at #1 seed, and 20% chance at title. It's just "right now" odds, not end of season odds, yeah. . .but I like those chances!
I also find it interesting that he has SA, OKC, and Miami finishing with the exact same record, and Chicago one game ahead of all 3. I don't expect HCA in the finals because the east play weaker teams more often so will have a slightly inflated record, but if we can get to the Finals, I don't think it matters much since we'd get 3 of the first 5 home games there anyway. I just like to force OKC to play LA in round 2. That'd be hilarious to watch. We're prolly gonna have to play Clippers or Grizzlies in the 2nd round anyway though, so it's not easy either way, but I'd just like to see OKC struggle against LA and see if they can earn there way to the WCF this time, rather than get to go against the 8 seed in the 2nd round again.
co_laper, I agree about Neal. Late in the game he almost seemed to single-handedly allow the Celtics to get close. He blew two defensive plays in a row, and three offensive possessions in a row. Got blown by once on D', didn't contest on the next possesion, and on 3 of our possessions, he: 1: threw the ball lazily to Rondo and got picked off which led to another easy basket (so you can call that 3 straight bad D' plays since he allowed them to score off that), 2: Threw another interception to a Celtic (Bradley I think it was, maybe Rondo), which led to more points on another defensive play he didn't try on. And 3: Jacked up a contested leaning three pointer with 16 seconds left on the shot clock. WTF?" All those screw ups led to a 6-0 run, and it was almost 100% Gary Neal's fault. Literally 2 TOs and a horrible shot taken, + 3 bad defensive plays.
So Neal literally wasted 3 of our possessions and got scored on 3x. All in a row. We went from up 7 to only up 1 and ended up in a slugfest to finish the game. Still won though, but with little thanks to him. I really hope TP isn't going to miss more than the next game, because Neal is NOT a good PG at all. We're doomed if Parker's gone. We literally cannot get anywhere without our big 3 still.
I'd also like to see Manu start to get more minutes. . .hopefully he gets into better shape soon. Our starting lineup is pretty offensively challenged, and usually struggles to do anything until we start subbing guys out. I don't wanna put too much blame on them, but Blair can't do much w/o getting assisted, and Green/Leonard are obviously limited there too. It's hard to play all 3 of them at once when Timmy's older now and can't carry us anymore.
Jackson really needs to step it up too. He hasn't been performing as some people here kept advertising him to. He's officially less productive on offense than RJ was here. I said we needed to wait about 10 games before we'd know, and now we do. Just like I said: Worse offensively, little better defensively. 'Eh. Still time for him to do better though.
LyMinh wrote:Sean Elliott can out-homer any announcer in the leauge.
Yet, Sean Elliot is intelligent and knows the game and all it's players. Which is why he's bearable. It's one thing if a guy's a homer, it's another when he's a homer and a total idiot with no basketball knowledge who just keeps talking bs to have something to say. That's the difference between the two. You just hate homers, which is fine. I don't mind them. What I don't like is total idiots who keep lying and making crap up. He's a professional, he should at least be forced to learn about the opposing team before the games so he doesn't keep saying blatantly wrong information.
The fat old guy Boston announcer clearly has a very limited knowledge of what's going on in the NBA, and not only obviously had no clue who Kawhi Leonard was. He also seemed to forget that Paul Pierce is almost 35 and isn't going to drive past a 20 year old who's more athletic and fast than Pierce ever was. Pierce hasn't driven past a quick SF in years without a screen helping him.
Pierce couldn't even get past 36 y/o Duncan at the end of the game and was forced to jack up a highly contested rainbow fadeaway for a brick that wasn't even close, which is exactly why Boston lost. Pierce can't drive on anyone. "GINOBLI CAN'T HANG WITH PIERCE!", while Ginobili's hand is about 1 inch from the ball while contesting on a shot that missed badly. Dude's both stupid and apparently has extremely blurred vision, because he wasn't even calling what was happening on the floor. I'm sure it might sound exciting on the radio, but when you are watching the game and what he's saying isn't even what's happening on the floor because he's trying to LITERALLY blind homer for his team .. .dude, that's just. . .no.