Page 1 of 1

G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:36 pm
by -Sammy-
WHERE: Vivint Smart Home Arena, Salt Lake City, UT
TV: AT&T SportsNet Rocky Mountain, FOX Sports SW
VEGAS: Jazz -4.5


The truncated Rodeo Road Trip rolls into the beehive state, hoping for some redemption from the L we took in our last home game before hitting the road. But don't let the .500 record fool you-- the Jazz are the hottest team in the league right now, winners of nine straight, including victories over the Warriors and Raps. We have to hope that the adjustments from Thursday's blockbuster trade will have them off their game enough that we can end their streak and get one of our own going. Tony and Dejounte are questionable for tonight, and Ricky Rubio (hip injury) is day-to-day.

Image

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:09 pm
by G R E Y
Wait, it gets better:
Read on Twitter


:wink:

EDIT: Looks like LMA will miss the next two games.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/22410155/san-antonio-spurs-forward-lamarcus-aldridge-miss-next-two-games-sore-knee
I assume this means he will not participate in the All-Star game and they'll all enjoy a much needed extended break?

I think we actually move the ball very well when LMA's not playing, but going up against Gobert without him will be a challenge, yet another we face this season. It's certainly been one of growth and adventure so far, hasn't it?

You could see the benefits of two (I think) extra practices; we did a lot of things well in the last game, and hopefully continue them tonight. We need to need to be more physical against them tonight. When Tony drove into them assertively and LMA muscled his way through to the key in the last game, we had good results. And we need to guard the arc and run back on D.

We have to be patient; things will get better.

GO SPURS!

p.s. I'd like to have heard 'Melissa's' version of the tale...

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:48 pm
by ducler
Image

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:18 pm
by imagump1313
GREY 1769 wrote:EDIT: Looks like LMA will miss the next two games.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/22410155/san-antonio-spurs-forward-lamarcus-aldridge-miss-next-two-games-sore-knee
I assume this means he will not participate in the All-Star game and they'll all enjoy a much needed extended break?


I would selfishly love for him to miss the All-Star Game. Take a break big fella!

We could very easily fall into the 4th seed by the end of the week. Pop is making it seem as if it doesn't really matter where we finish and I'm ok with that. Hopefully we can get everybody back and healthy and try to get hot at the right time.

I don't know if its just me, but I'm getting the feeling more and more from Pop and the entire organization that this year is just not that important to them. They are just going to let it play out and whatever happens, happens. All the injuries have maybe caused them to step back and say wait until next year. Maybe we make the big free-agent splash again next season or at least be healthy?
IDK, it just doesn't seem like we have any sense of urgency at the moment.

I'll hold that thought until hopefully we get Kawhi and Gay back playing.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:08 am
by G R E Y
imagump1313 wrote:
GREY 1769 wrote:EDIT: Looks like LMA will miss the next two games.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/22410155/san-antonio-spurs-forward-lamarcus-aldridge-miss-next-two-games-sore-knee
I assume this means he will not participate in the All-Star game and they'll all enjoy a much needed extended break?


I would selfishly love for him to miss the All-Star Game. Take a break big fella!

We could very easily fall into the 4th seed by the end of the week. Pop is making it seem as if it doesn't really matter where we finish and I'm ok with that. Hopefully we can get everybody back and healthy and try to get hot at the right time.

I don't know if its just me, but I'm getting the feeling more and more from Pop and the entire organization that this year is just not that important to them. They are just going to let it play out and whatever happens, happens. All the injuries have maybe caused them to step back and say wait until next year. Maybe we make the big free-agent splash again next season or at least be healthy?
IDK, it just doesn't seem like we have any sense of urgency at the moment.

I'll hold that thought until hopefully we get Kawhi and Gay back playing.

I'd love it if he got the rest, too, but it seems as if he's getting it beforehand in SA, then going to the All Star game.
Read on Twitter


As to your point about Pop et al not pushing it this year, it's funny, I don't know why but the LMA news got me feeling that we are going to go full tilt post-AS break. Of course, this is all depending on the health of Kawhi and Rudy. We have been liberal with sitting other players out, 'Pop caution', and while this gives extra minutes and seasoning that other Spurs would not otherwise have gotten, it prepares them for a team push down the stretch and in the playoffs.

I think we need to see what we have, but Spurs players feel as if they're itching to go all in firing on all cylinders. Plus we need to show Kawhi this is the place to stay and sign the super max or thereabouts.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:41 am
by jptremblay
Nice to see Pau in the paint again...even if he's struggling. He's being great at defense and limiting Gobert's rebounding hability, while creating great opportunities for his teammates.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:55 am
by jptremblay
Another trash final play for the win designed by Pop. Have we ever hit any shot this season having the possession to win the game? Kyle Anderson is a great player but he is by far the one of the last guys that you should give the ball to score in the final possession. Without Gobert we should have searched for Pau, who has the edge over Favors, and if he's doubled, he won't force the shot and will pass to it the open man. I don't understand why without Aldridge and Leonard almost all of our offense consist in brick shot after shot and over use the pick and roll situations.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:23 am
by Cappy_Smurf
Damn that infernal Pop and his Jedi mind tricks. :) Almost worked too. Anyway, kind of an ugly game compared to what Utah has been playing. I hope nobody takes note of Pop sitting his best player and playing a bunch of hungry, eager players to try and break our streak.

GG fellas.

P.S. Please beat Denver tomorrow. Thanks.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:35 pm
by G R E Y
jptremblay wrote:Another trash final play for the win designed by Pop. Have we ever hit any shot this season having the possession to win the game? Kyle Anderson is a great player but he is by far the one of the last guys that you should give the ball to score in the final possession. Without Gobert we should have searched for Pau, who has the edge over Favors, and if he's doubled, he won't force the shot and will pass to it the open man. I don't understand why without Aldridge and Leonard almost all of our offense consist in brick shot after shot and over use the pick and roll situations.

You think that what we saw executed was the 'final play... designed by Pop'? That's like saying Pop also drew up Kyle picking up his dribble early and getting the ball ripped from his hands for a turnover and bucket the other way on the previous possession. :roll:

And Manu's won two games for us this season in final possessions.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:57 pm
by G R E Y
I love much of what we did in this game, and thought we had an excellent game plan. Credit to the Jazz for adjusting and doubling our ball handlers to pressure us. We had some broken plays at the end, but the result wasn't just about those last plays.

It's a pity we couldn't close it out, but we've shown some noticeable improvements in terms of details on defense and flow on offense this game and much of the last one that we haven't shown in several previous games.

Chins up. Let's keep this in mind:

Read on Twitter


It's amazing what we've accomplished so far this season.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:59 pm
by jptremblay
GREY 1769 wrote:
jptremblay wrote:Another trash final play for the win designed by Pop. Have we ever hit any shot this season having the possession to win the game? Kyle Anderson is a great player but he is by far the one of the last guys that you should give the ball to score in the final possession. Without Gobert we should have searched for Pau, who has the edge over Favors, and if he's doubled, he won't force the shot and will pass to it the open man. I don't understand why without Aldridge and Leonard almost all of our offense consist in brick shot after shot and over use the pick and roll situations.

You think that what we saw executed was the 'final play... designed by Pop'? That's like saying Pop also drew up Kyle picking up his dribble early and getting the ball ripped from his hands for a turnover and bucket the other way on the previous possession. :roll:

And Manu's won two games for us this season in final possessions.

Well, I don't blame Manu, he is a clutch guy. And while Pop wasn't expecting that play, that's what happens when you have a weird offense guy in the final lineup.
And you can't let him tell his teammates to isolate him when they were offering the pick an roll or some help...to then make the epic fail.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:10 pm
by -Sammy-
Cappy_Smurf wrote:GG fellas.


Good game, Cappy! How long have you followed the Jazz? Y'all's dominance over us this season is taking me back to the mid/late 90s, when you guys would always give us fits (knocking us out of the playoffs three times in five seasons, breaking our then-franchise-record regular-season winning streak). I HATED playing the Jazz in those years.

GREY 1769 wrote:I love much of what we did in this game, and thought we had an excellent game plan. Credit to the Jazz for adjusting and doubling our ball handlers to pressure us. We had some broken plays at the end, but the result wasn't just about those last plays.

...we've shown some noticeable improvements in terms of details on defense and flow on offense this game...


Yeah, lost in the fog of our ongoing struggles and injury issues is the fact that for most of the night, we played a good game of basketball. The down-the-stretch stuff is a little frustrating because those are the puzzles you expect teams with a veteran presence to solve, but those are also the situations where the stars come out and ours were all benched; in my opinion, it's pretty obvious that Pop is intent on making these 'teachable moments', win/loss be damned.

jptremblay wrote:I don't understand why without Aldridge and Leonard almost all of our offense consist in brick shot after shot and over use the pick and roll situations.


Tough shots and heavy pick-and-roll action are usually indicators of motion offense, so I wonder how much of it is Pop giving the guys a long leash and how much of it is the offense breaking.

imagump1313 wrote:All the injuries have maybe caused them to step back and say wait until next year.


This is how I feel; not that anyone's giving up, exactly, but that the leaders know a fully-healthy team is a long shot to get past GS and a banged-up team isn't doing it (or beating Houston in a series), so they might as well use this time to teach, experiment with lineups and sets, get burn for the kids, etc.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:17 pm
by -Sammy-
One thing that never fails to amuse me is the mild delusion almost every local sports-press suffers from. I listened to the postgame coverage on local radio last night, and they sounded legitimately shocked that this team, with all its injuries and limitations in a strong conference, may fail to win 50 games. The callers were even worse; I get hometown pride and believing in your team no matter what and all that, but some of the Spurs 'fans' in this town are insufferable homers-- they sound like they've never watched a single non-Spurs game and can't name a single non-Spurs player other than LeBron, Curry and Durant.

Like, if that's who you are, fair enough, but don't act like you have the ability to comment on the Spurs' chances if you only watch one team out of 30.

Ha ha-- sorry. I know every team in every town has that faction of fans, but it drives me insane.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:33 pm
by Cappy_Smurf
BombsquadSammy wrote:
Cappy_Smurf wrote:GG fellas.

Good game, Cappy! How long have you followed the Jazz? Y'all's dominance over us this season is taking me back to the mid/late 90s, when you guys would always give us fits (knocking us out of the playoffs three times in five seasons, breaking our then-franchise-record regular-season winning streak). I HATED playing the Jazz in those years.


Sounds like you're old. 8-)

Well, me too. I've been a Jazz fan for about 35 years, maybe a little longer. I remember watching the team before Stockton and Malone, and then really became a fan when those 2 started to become great players.

I also remember when Pop(I think it was an old interview with Pop) said they were trying to build the team in the Utah model or something. Now you guys are the gold standard and Utah is hoping to build in SA model. :D Times have really changed.

I'll never cease to be amazed how Pop can take any group of players and have them winning games and playing like champs. I remember a day when Jazz fans considered Sloan and Pop to be on a similar level. I can honestly say now that even though Sloan was a really good coach, he's never been in the same class as Pop. You guys are really lucky to have had such an amazing coach for so long. I can't even begin to imagine the Spurs without Pop.

Anyway, good luck tonight and I hope you beat the Nuggets badly. As nice as it is to be on a 10 game win streak, we haven't made up much ground in the playoff race because everybody else is refusing to cooperate with losing games. We need all the help we can get.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:58 pm
by -Sammy-
Cappy_Smurf wrote:
BombsquadSammy wrote:
Cappy_Smurf wrote:GG fellas.

Good game, Cappy! How long have you followed the Jazz? Y'all's dominance over us this season is taking me back to the mid/late 90s, when you guys would always give us fits (knocking us out of the playoffs three times in five seasons, breaking our then-franchise-record regular-season winning streak). I HATED playing the Jazz in those years.


Sounds like you're old. 8-)

Well, me too. I've been a Jazz fan for about 35 years, maybe a little longer. I remember watching the team before Stockton and Malone, and then really became a fan when those 2 started to become great players.


Nice. A funny story from that era is that y'all swept us in the '94 regular season 4-0 (including breaking our winning streak), then we drew you in the first round of the playoffs. I told all my friends we were going to get swept and they mocked my lack of faith, so we put money on game one-- which the Spurs won; they then proceeded to lose the next three games and bow out of the playoffs. So the only time the Spurs beat the Jazz that season, I lost money on it.

Cappy_Smurf wrote:I remember a day when Jazz fans considered Sloan and Pop to be on a similar level. I can honestly say now that even though Sloan was a really good coach, he's never been in the same class as Pop. You guys are really lucky to have had such an amazing coach for so long. I can't even begin to imagine the Spurs without Pop.


We're awfully fortunate and I hold Pop in pretty high regard, but in my opinion, Sloan is not only one of the great coaches in league history, but he's far-and-away the most underrated as well. I rarely see his name mentioned in discussions about GOAT coaches, and it should be. It makes me sad that he never took another job, especially after the way he went out; I feel like he would've been great in OKC during the Durant era.

Cappy_Smurf wrote:Anyway, good luck tonight and I hope you beat the Nuggets badly. As nice as it is to be on a 10 game win streak, we haven't made up much ground in the playoff race because everybody else is refusing to cooperate with losing games. We need all the help we can get.


Thanks! I hope you guys sneak in, and I hope my guys help out a little tonight. It'd be awesome to see y'all give the Ws or Rox a tough first round.

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:31 pm
by Cappy_Smurf
BombsquadSammy wrote:Nice. A funny story from that era is that y'all swept us in the '94 regular season 4-0 (including breaking our winning streak), then we drew you in the first round of the playoffs. I told all my friends we were going to get swept and they mocked my lack of faith, so we put money on game one-- which the Spurs won; they then proceeded to lose the next three games and bow out of the playoffs. So the only time the Spurs beat the Jazz that season, I lost money on it.


Lol. Sounds like my kind of luck


BombsquadSammy wrote:We're awfully fortunate and I hold Pop in pretty high regard, but in my opinion, Sloan is not only one of the great coaches in league history, but he's far-and-away the most underrated as well. I rarely see his name mentioned in discussions about GOAT coaches, and it should be. It makes me sad that he never took another job, especially after the way he went out; I feel like he would've been great in OKC during the Durant era.


We probably wouldn't agree much on Sloan. Jerry really should have hung it up a couple years before he did. The big difference between him and Pop is Pop's ability to adjust to the modern game and to different players. Jerry was fantastic during the Stockton and Malone years, but really didn't do all that well after they left. He did fine with Deron and Boozer, but then just lost the team when we replaced Booze with Al Jefferson. We made the WCF one year, but only because Dallas got knocked out in the 1st round by the 8th seed. Those Deron/Boozer teams were really 2nd round exit teams at best.

Jerry thought the 3 point shot was gimmicky and a trend that would pass. Our GM wanted to draft Chris Paul, but went with Deron Williams because that's who Sloan wanted. Then when Deron turned out not to be John Stockton, Sloan just couldn't figure out how to use him differently. For the last 2 years, Jerry would try to force the same plays over and over, regardless of the fact that the defense was keyed in to everything we were doing. Deron finally broke down and started free lancing a little, and this really pissed Sloan off. Later, after Sloan quit, Deron was made out to be a spoiled brat for being disobedient, but if you go back and watch those games that year, and the year before that matter, you'll see that Deron tried his best to do what Sloan wanted, and finally just broke down because he hated losing and wanted to try anything to change it, which is something Jerry couldn't do.

There are also many instances of Sloan playing inferior players over better ones, simply because he liked a guy more or had a better relationship with him. Our best 3point shooter would get benched if he made 3 in a row, just because Sloan felt it was outside of what he felt our offense should be doing. I could go on for days, but I know I'm already dragging on a bit. :) One thing I will say, is that Deron Williams got thrown under the bus unfairly in the whole Sloan quitting incident. Regardless of what anyone thinks of Deron, the worst thing about him is he was grumpy to deal with when he was losing, and I'd much prefer that to someone who is fine with it.

Another thing most people don't really realize, but Sloan had lost the whole team by the time he quit IMO. It wasn't just a one player problem, as Jerry had butted heads with many players over the years. This is a big reason why he never took another job, as was his health. Sloan has been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease and a form of dementia. My honest opinion is that he was in the early stages of dementia for a year or two before he quit, which explains why a hard-nosed, never say die coach would walk out and quit in the middle of a season.

Anyway, the tl;dr version is that I feel Sloan's stubornness with the game prevented him from being successful after S&M left. Sorry for derailing your game thread with this, but as you can see, I'm pretty set in my feelings on Sloan. :oops:

Re: G A M E D A Y: Spurs (35-22) @ Jazz (28-28), 8PM Central

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:44 am
by -Sammy-
Cappy_Smurf wrote:We probably wouldn't agree much on Sloan. Jerry really should have hung it up a couple years before he did. The big difference between him and Pop is Pop's ability to adjust to the modern game and to different players. Jerry was fantastic during the Stockton and Malone years, but really didn't do all that well after they left. He did fine with Deron and Boozer, but then just lost the team when we replaced Booze with Al Jefferson. We made the WCF one year, but only because Dallas got knocked out in the 1st round by the 8th seed. Those Deron/Boozer teams were really 2nd round exit teams at best.

Jerry thought the 3 point shot was gimmicky and a trend that would pass. Our GM wanted to draft Chris Paul, but went with Deron Williams because that's who Sloan wanted. Then when Deron turned out not to be John Stockton, Sloan just couldn't figure out how to use him differently. For the last 2 years, Jerry would try to force the same plays over and over, regardless of the fact that the defense was keyed in to everything we were doing. Deron finally broke down and started free lancing a little, and this really pissed Sloan off. Later, after Sloan quit, Deron was made out to be a spoiled brat for being disobedient, but if you go back and watch those games that year, and the year before that matter, you'll see that Deron tried his best to do what Sloan wanted, and finally just broke down because he hated losing and wanted to try anything to change it, which is something Jerry couldn't do.

There are also many instances of Sloan playing inferior players over better ones, simply because he liked a guy more or had a better relationship with him. Our best 3point shooter would get benched if he made 3 in a row, just because Sloan felt it was outside of what he felt our offense should be doing. I could go on for days, but I know I'm already dragging on a bit. :) One thing I will say, is that Deron Williams got thrown under the bus unfairly in the whole Sloan quitting incident. Regardless of what anyone thinks of Deron, the worst thing about him is he was grumpy to deal with when he was losing, and I'd much prefer that to someone who is fine with it.

Another thing most people don't really realize, but Sloan had lost the whole team by the time he quit IMO. It wasn't just a one player problem, as Jerry had butted heads with many players over the years. This is a big reason why he never took another job, as was his health. Sloan has been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease and a form of dementia. My honest opinion is that he was in the early stages of dementia for a year or two before he quit, which explains why a hard-nosed, never say die coach would walk out and quit in the middle of a season.

Anyway, the tl;dr version is that I feel Sloan's stubornness with the game prevented him from being successful after S&M left. Sorry for derailing your game thread with this, but as you can see, I'm pretty set in my feelings on Sloan. :oops:


No, I'm really glad you posted this; it's intriguing to hear such a different take on Sloan from someone who's in such a better position to judge his coaching legacy than I am. I was in high school in the mid-90s and was influenced heavily by my basketball coaches, who were big Sloan guys; after Utah fell off, Karl left and Stock retired, I guess my perception was that Sloan must be doing good things up there for the Jazz to rebuild and get back into the playoff mix so quickly. But that was a perception from a distance, and your thoughts shed a lot more light on the post-Malone (ha ha) era.