jptremblay wrote:GREY 1769 wrote:I'm sure they'll double LMA and force the rest of our Spurs to make shots. I'm sure they'll run. And I'm sure we'll be ready. We still ended up with the #1 defense without our best defender,
LMA found a new groove, Kyle stepped up in his new starter role, and so has Dejounte. Tony and Bryn have found their jumpers, Patty will work his synergy with LMA, Rudy's back, and Manu with conjure his magic. Looks like we're going smaller but quicker with our starting line-up: Murray, Patty, Danny, Kyle, LMA
As for who is not on the roster, it's still "... and then there was one."
SPURS IN 6
GO SPURS GO!!!
Sorry but this is the PO, Parker is right now worse than White, Mills can't hit anything in a consistent way and he plays dumb. Kyle is a great compliment with some scorers around him but he's completely useless in PO at offense. Dejounte it's too raw still and inexperienced. LMA will somehow put decent numbers but won't dominate for us which is our only real possibility to surpass GSW...so...I don't expect much right now.
Only Ginobili, Gay, and Forbes came to play tonight.
Without Kawhi or a drastic change in the offensive schemes this one is totally over for us.
I was going by the last couple of games where Tony found his jumper with his legs under him. Tonight he **** the bed, simple as that. But we all looked tentative and on our heels from the start, almost as if we were surprised that they'd bring their A game.
They did double LMA, but we dribbled around too much and gave them time to recover from the doubling, and didn't pass it quickly enough to take advantage. We rushed our shots, just not our game.
Like you rightly pointed out, Manu and Rudy drove and made shots, Bryn did well in getting into pockets of space for stop & pop jumpers. Murray is green, but how else can he get experience? I thought he did well in driving assertively, something we didn't do enough of, and as a team got pushed into shooting long Js.
LMA (14 points on 5-12, well below his 23 points on 18FGA per game) wasn't even our leading scorer - that was Rudy with 15 (also on 5-12), but there were a couple of troubling - though not unfixable trends this game: one, the other four starters combined for a mere 19 points. So despite a 21-point loss, it actually could have been worse had it not ben for our bench; two, we had ZERO SECOND CHANCE POINTS (at least up until the point of that tweet, which was, I think, half-way through the fourth):
Rudy led us with 6 rebounds, LMA only 2. They outrebounded us 51-30, and our assist-to-turnover ratio was 19 to 12 (8 in the first half, I believe, but oddly enough we got 19 points from their turnovers and gave up 11 on ours), and they bettered us 34-22 points in the paint, and that's because we got many of the in the final Q:
These are more indicative of them taking it to us, rushing us on O and outhustling us on D.
I can't speak for Tony's and Patty's shooting, only to say I hope a game like this lights a fire under them, but the other issues are team D related, and definitely things we can fix. The third time we played the Warriors, we had a lead and KD had a lot of possessions in a row, scoring 14 straight. Getting the ball out of his hands is paramount. Also, we tend to shrink mentally against tall athletic players - KD, McGee, AD, Alphabet - so we have to make a concerted effort to take it to them rather than pull farther away from the basket. The one time we did well was our win against the Pelicans when we kept taking it to the basket aggressively and got AD into foul trouble. So either that or make sure the ball doesn't so easily get into Durant's hands in the first place.
I expect us to come out with a better focus and attention to detail and hustle next game. It was a disappointing effort, but no matter the score, it only counts as one game. I don't love that we came out flat, but we've been resilient all season long, and I love our team for that.
GO SPURS GO!