Page 1 of 2
LeBron, The most dominant player in the NBA
Posted: Thu Mar 6, 2008 5:17 pm
by heathmalc
LeBron James is the single most dominant player in the NBA. I am a Cavaliers fan, so it can be argued that I am biased, but let the record speak for itself: LeBron puts up numbers that no NBA player has managed since Oscar Robertson (the four game stretch of 30/12/11). He has put-up single game performances that hasn't been seen in 35 years (50 pts, 8 rb, 10ast). He is the youngest player to accomplish every feat, breaking records that Kobe previously held, a year earlier than Kobe.
Total dominance? LeBron James is 6'9 260 (according to him), he has played, and guarded EVERY position this season. What other player can claim that? Can any even claim 4 of the 5? He is the only SF I have seen back down Dwight Howard.
People say he doesn't play defense that well. I disagree. When the Cavaliers played the Lakers, who guarded Kobe in the 4th quarter - and shut him down? That's right, LeBron! And who guarded LeBron? Kobe. But did HE shut LeBron down? No.
I use Kobe Bryant here because he is the person that is considered the best scorer in the game... yet LeBron guarded him during crunch-time. If he can shut-down the default best scorer in the league, then how can anyone say he isn't a good defender?
Add to all of this that he turned 23 years old just a couple months ago, and how can anyone not be convinced that LeBron is the single most dominant force in the league?
People point to Kobe Bryant as the best scorer. And I cannot deny that his shot is prettier than LeBron's and he makes some seemingly magical shots. However, LeBron shoots a higher percentage than Kobe, and if he took less jump-shots and drove the lane more, his percentage would rise dramatically.
In conclusion, LeBron does things that not even Michael Jordan accomplished in his illustrious career; He has gone head-to-head with the best big men and the best guards in the league, yet always seems to come out on top. When he is in the All-Star game (every year), he is the guy that the coaches run their offense through. When LeBron is on the court, he is the MAIN focus of the opposing defense, regardless of who else in on his team. That, in itself say everything that needs to be said: LeBron is the best.
Posted: Thu Mar 6, 2008 5:55 pm
by Magz50
And you post this on the Spurs board because........??

Posted: Thu Mar 6, 2008 6:11 pm
by co_laper
What's the point? I thought this article was gonna have something to do with the Spurs. Lebron is the best young talent available, but right now, i honestly will still take Kobe Bryant over Lebron James.
Posted: Thu Mar 6, 2008 8:51 pm
by Blame Rasho
I am glad they banned you... you can circle jerk somewhere else.
Posted: Thu Mar 6, 2008 9:10 pm
by Ballings7
Tim Duncan is superior.
------------
Didn't get to see that game (was actually thinking about taping it, but didn't), but from the highlights it looked like it would of been a blast to watch. As a basketball fan.
Posted: Thu Mar 6, 2008 10:33 pm
by mudyez
http://realgm.com/boards/search.php?sea ... =heathmalc
wow...take a look at the one in the toronto-thread!...it has more than 1200 views while most others have less than 100
Posted: Thu Mar 6, 2008 11:32 pm
by Donald Kaufman
Thanks heathmalc, I had no idea LBJ was such a great player. You've really opened my eyes.

Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 5:24 am
by UDRIH14
yeh he was so dominant he got his ass handed to him by tim duncan and the spurs in the finals 4-0 gtfo dont come back
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 6:43 am
by Ballings7
The problem I have with the Cavs is, LeBron still has no legit 2nd offensive option. No proven side-kick. No Pippen-type. Ilgauskas is 3rd option at most. West is around there, too.
They've had and do have the role-players (and finally an upgrade at PG), but still no right hand man for LBJ. Hughes wasn't the right fit there in that role, who generally isn't a #2 offensive guy anyway.
This gets overlooked a lot, because of how good and big-time LeBron is. But, he still needs a serious helper.
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:05 am
by big123
UDRIH14 wrote:yeh he was so dominant he got his ass handed to him by tim duncan and the spurs in the finals 4-0 gtfo dont come back
Yeah LOL, a guy has the nerve to come into a Spurs forum and tout how good Lebron is after the Spurs dismantled his team last year in a convincing sweep. Makes no sense at all...
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:09 am
by SD2042
Ballings7 wrote:The problem I have with the Cavs is, LeBron still has no legit 2nd offensive option. No proven side-kick. No Pippen-type. Ilgauskas is 3rd option at most. West is around there, too.
They've had and do have the role-players (and finally an upgrade at PG), but still no right hand man for LBJ. Hughes wasn't the right fit there in that role, who generally isn't a #2 offensive guy anyway.
This gets overlooked a lot, because of how good and big-time LeBron is. But, he still needs a serious helper.
As long as it's the LBJ show, everybody else will get the third rated offensive option routine. You're right though. LBJ needs another scorer to help relive a bit of the pressure off of him some game days.
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:34 am
by Duiz
big123 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Yeah LOL, a guy has the nerve to come into a Spurs forum and tout how good Lebron is after the Spurs dismantled his team last year in a convincing sweep. Makes no sense at all...
Thankfully he got banned. But I was gonna say the very same thing.
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:43 am
by Ballings7
It's not so much about the option, oppurtunities, as it is about the level of player next on down from LeBron. The drop-off in ability is incredible after LeBron. That drop off needs to be lessened to better the team and increase their chances in the playoffs.
Even on the level of a third option player, there isn't a real third option there. Ilgauskas is still an above-average player, but not what he used to be.
Also, Cleveland, is still not close to being a balanced squad. Their offense needs to get better. I'd say they improved to an extent offensively with their trade. But again, that other significant player that is better than the rest, is needed, and I think they'd be a balanced team with that added dimension.
As great as LeBron is, and as much as he can do, he can only do so much as one player.
If LeBron can get to the finals more and/or win the title without a good 2nd guy, a constant right hand man - it'll be amazing.
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 4:25 pm
by Magz50
Why has this thread gone to 2 pages on the Spurs board? lol this thread got locked nearly everywhere else.
On second thoughts, we need as much threads as possible on this board if we're to climb the thread ladder and get out of second last place lol.
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 4:34 pm
by Rique
Who's last place and how far ahead are we?
I'm guessing the bobcats hold this one.
How far are we to get third from last place?
Is there a place to see these post counts?
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 4:45 pm
by Magz50
New Orleans is last at 1078, we're second last at 1188.
Next lowest is the Clippers with 1308. Then it's a big jump to Grizz and Cavs at 1726 and 1733 respectively.
We gotta make a charge fellas!
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 5:28 pm
by LyMinh
You overlooked the most important statistic. 0 rings.
And after that, the most games he had ever won is 50, and it's doubtful he'll win anymore than that this year.
He's a great young talent, but come back when he's something more than merely a statistical powerhouse.
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:14 pm
by Rique
Magz50 wrote:New Orleans is last at 1078, we're second last at 1188.
Next lowest is the Clippers with 1308. Then it's a big jump to Grizz and Cavs at 1726 and 1733 respectively.
We gotta make a charge fellas!
Maybe our posting picks up like the Spurs play after the all Star break. Its time for our second half surge fellas. Post away!
Posted: Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:01 pm
by SashAlex
He's posted that on every board ! Homer !
But I'd put :
1st. TD and KG
2nd. Kobe
3rd. Chris Paul
4th. ...
5th...
100000000th. LeBronze the "Queen" James !
Posted: Sat Mar 8, 2008 1:56 am
by big123
LyMinh wrote:You overlooked the most important statistic. 0 rings.
And after that, the most games he had ever won is 50, and it's doubtful he'll win anymore than that this year.
He's a great young talent, but come back when he's something more than merely a statistical powerhouse.
It's not even about that, it's about what the Spurs have done which makes it so hilarious.