Kerr not the only exec to wonder about Barry's return to S.A
Posted: Sun Mar 9, 2008 8:18 am
Found this at SpursReport...
In addition to the Shaq trade, Steve Kerr didn't do himself any favors with one other comment he made this week.
He told Phoenix radio station KTAR that he didn't understand why Seattle waived Brent Barry instead of Donyell Marshall at the trade deadline, and hinted at a con-Spuracy between Barry, Sonics GM Sam Presti (who worked for the Spurs until June 2007) and his former employers to return Barry to San Antonio.
Kerr isn't the only Western Conference exec to wonder about Barry's return to San Antonio, which was legal but nonetheless left a bad smell.
But his specific complaint about the Sonics not waiving Marshall was odd.
For starters, Marshall clearly had more to offer the Sonics than Barry. With his contract expiring in 2009, they may be able to parlay Marshall into a future draft pick just as they did with Kurt Thomas this year.
More importantly, what Kerr suggests was not possible -- the two players were never on the Sonics at the same time.
Seattle was at the league roster limit after trading for Barry and Francisco Elson, and needed to waive a player in order for the 11-player, trade-deadline deal that brought them Marshall to be approved by the league.
Since Barry was six years older than anyone else on the roster and had an expiring contract, he was the obvious choice.
http://www.spursreport.com/forums/showt ... hp?t=84971
In addition to the Shaq trade, Steve Kerr didn't do himself any favors with one other comment he made this week.
He told Phoenix radio station KTAR that he didn't understand why Seattle waived Brent Barry instead of Donyell Marshall at the trade deadline, and hinted at a con-Spuracy between Barry, Sonics GM Sam Presti (who worked for the Spurs until June 2007) and his former employers to return Barry to San Antonio.
Kerr isn't the only Western Conference exec to wonder about Barry's return to San Antonio, which was legal but nonetheless left a bad smell.
But his specific complaint about the Sonics not waiving Marshall was odd.
For starters, Marshall clearly had more to offer the Sonics than Barry. With his contract expiring in 2009, they may be able to parlay Marshall into a future draft pick just as they did with Kurt Thomas this year.
More importantly, what Kerr suggests was not possible -- the two players were never on the Sonics at the same time.
Seattle was at the league roster limit after trading for Barry and Francisco Elson, and needed to waive a player in order for the 11-player, trade-deadline deal that brought them Marshall to be approved by the league.
Since Barry was six years older than anyone else on the roster and had an expiring contract, he was the obvious choice.
http://www.spursreport.com/forums/showt ... hp?t=84971