TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
Moderator: G R E Y
TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
Bucks Trade
Joe Alexander
Richard Jefferson
Bucks Receive
Nocioni
Roger Mason
Mason bought out and returned to spurs
Kings Trade
Nocioni
Ron Artest Trade Exception
Kings Receive
Alexander
Bruce Bowen
Kurt Thomas
Future Spurs first, Lottery Protected
All spurs players will be bought out and return to the spurs.
Spurs Trade
Bruce Bowen
Kurt Thomas
Roger Mason
Future 1st round pick, Lottery Protected
Spurs Receive
Richard Jefferson
Bucks-Simple enough save money to get CV, Session and maybe are first. then get nocioni who SS loves. Nocioni would be a great guy to split time with LRMAM
The bucks should be at 59 mil.
Kings-Future Cap! Yes your taking on 3 mil dollars, but most of that money is coming from getting alezander. You get a young prospect and then don't have to deal with nocioni long term deal.
Spurs-You get RJ for going about 2 or 3 mil over the salary cap(once the players get brought back for vet min they'll be somewhere around 72-73).
You guys didn't comment on the Trades and Transaction board, so I thought i'd bring it straight to you.
Joe Alexander
Richard Jefferson
Bucks Receive
Nocioni
Roger Mason
Mason bought out and returned to spurs
Kings Trade
Nocioni
Ron Artest Trade Exception
Kings Receive
Alexander
Bruce Bowen
Kurt Thomas
Future Spurs first, Lottery Protected
All spurs players will be bought out and return to the spurs.
Spurs Trade
Bruce Bowen
Kurt Thomas
Roger Mason
Future 1st round pick, Lottery Protected
Spurs Receive
Richard Jefferson
Bucks-Simple enough save money to get CV, Session and maybe are first. then get nocioni who SS loves. Nocioni would be a great guy to split time with LRMAM
The bucks should be at 59 mil.
Kings-Future Cap! Yes your taking on 3 mil dollars, but most of that money is coming from getting alezander. You get a young prospect and then don't have to deal with nocioni long term deal.
Spurs-You get RJ for going about 2 or 3 mil over the salary cap(once the players get brought back for vet min they'll be somewhere around 72-73).
You guys didn't comment on the Trades and Transaction board, so I thought i'd bring it straight to you.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,885
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 16, 2004
- Location: Nashville, TN @Vandy
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
Throw in Kevin Martin and we'll call it a deal.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
really no interesting richard jefferson?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
- Nolan
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,911
- And1: 6,612
- Joined: Aug 26, 2007
- Location: Edmonton AB
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
WiscoKing13 wrote:really no interesting richard jefferson?
Not really we already have our Parker, Manu and Duncan to carry us offensively so we really don't need another scorer, we depth and good role players.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
so you don't think RJ and Bowen at the 3 wouldn't be great on D. At the end of the game having RJ and bowen on the floor would be a pretty nice luxary
Its not like you guys are giving up anything beside a late first
Its not like you guys are giving up anything beside a late first
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,757
- And1: 662
- Joined: Jan 27, 2005
- Location: Australia
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
lol spurs will be in the tax anyway without this trade, thats if they decide to invest into GOODEN.
but no i dont like this deal, I DONT think the spurs wanna waste watever cap they have in 2010 for RJ...he aint worth it.
but no i dont like this deal, I DONT think the spurs wanna waste watever cap they have in 2010 for RJ...he aint worth it.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,885
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 16, 2004
- Location: Nashville, TN @Vandy
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
Mason > Jefferson
Yeah I said it
Yeah I said it
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
LyMinh wrote:Mason > Jefferson
Yeah I said it
I doubt that, but your still getting mason back
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
jw, would your owner ever into the lux?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
- Nolan
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,911
- And1: 6,612
- Joined: Aug 26, 2007
- Location: Edmonton AB
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
WiscoKing13 wrote:so you don't think RJ and Bowen at the 3 wouldn't be great on D. At the end of the game having RJ and bowen on the floor would be a pretty nice luxary
Its not like you guys are giving up anything beside a late first
Why do we need RJ on the floor late in games when we have Manu, who's better in every way.
Like I said before the Spurs have no use for another big scorer.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
- Donald Kaufman
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,409
- And1: 602
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
LyMinh wrote:Mason > Jefferson
Yeah I said it
For the purposes of our team and system, yeah for sure.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- On Leave
- Posts: 42,087
- And1: 9,769
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
I like Alexander... but i doubt we can get him separately...
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
Then why were you rumored to be going after VC, If you don't need another scorer?
I just thought your 3 spot looks weak on paper, with bowen getting up their in age.
I just don't get how you guys can argue with getting a player like RJ for a first and a couple mil over the Luxary tax for one year. Then after that he's a large expiring who can either play his contract through or be a huge trading chip.
I just thought your 3 spot looks weak on paper, with bowen getting up their in age.
I just don't get how you guys can argue with getting a player like RJ for a first and a couple mil over the Luxary tax for one year. Then after that he's a large expiring who can either play his contract through or be a huge trading chip.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
- Donald Kaufman
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,409
- And1: 602
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
Our most pressing need is a rebounding big and better D. Jefferson provides neither of these.
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: TI: Bucks/Spurs/Kings
Duncan, Bonner, Thomas and gooden aren't good enough?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.