Page 1 of 1

Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:54 pm
by MjJunkYard
Why would the Spurs waive McClinton before training camp? Do they already have 15 players under contract for 2009-2010 and want to give him a chance to catch a shot with another team? It doesn't make sense to me

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:06 am
by C_Money
I don't know but he's a spot on 3 point shooter.

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:01 am
by ss1986v2
14 guaranteed contracts as of today, with guys already ahead of him for number 15. spurs might have wanted him to sign overseas like gist did last season but he didnt and they dont have the room for him.

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:32 am
by BIRDMAN BIRDMAN
McClinton himself on Twitter said that he requested the waive.

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:52 am
by Marc
MjJunkYard wrote:Why would the Spurs waive McClinton before training camp? Do they already have 15 players under contract for 2009-2010 and want to give him a chance to catch a shot with another team? It doesn't make sense to me


Keith Bogans

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:47 am
by batmana
This move was expected, especially after the signing of Keith Bogans. Plus, I'd rather see us give one last chance to Malik Hairston. McClinton might make the NBA in a couple of years but first he's gotta establish himself. Another option for him could be to sign with a team that is rebuilding and see some playing time there but there was certainly no playing time left for him here.

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:23 am
by Stella Artois
According to wiretap roster now stands at 18. So who will be waived next ?

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:40 pm
by Nolan
I think it was between him and Hariston after we signed Bogans and i'm glad we kept Hariston. But I would of rather waived Williams and held onto McClinton, I'd feel alot better having a third PG on the roster rather than another swing man.

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:17 pm
by SApuro_
I thought Mcclinton was a steal at 51 but he had a terrible summer camp. We bring in guys that are already established like Boguns, Ratliff, plus Fin resigns and there really wasn't any room for him. The spurs must be really high on Georgie to not go after a 3rd string PG. I mean its not like we aren't throwing extra cash around. I figured if there was any insurance player we would need its a PG even before Ratliff and Boguns.

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:29 am
by co_laper
Compared to McClinton, I'd rather have us keep Marcus Williams or Malik Hairston. Sure, he was a steal at 51 in a very very weak draft. But in a normal draft, I think McClinton is drafted exactly where he should be. Plus, SGs with a PG's body needs to prove they can score first. He couldn't even do that in Summer League.

Re: Spurs waive McClinton

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:11 pm
by Blame Rasho
I think if he can't get his shot off in SL, there is no way he can do it in the NBA...