If there had to be one?

The place to discuss the history of Seattle Supersonics Basketball.

Moderator: Cactus Jack

User avatar
wiff
Head Coach
Posts: 6,887
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 22, 2006
Location: Gettin da boot!

If there had to be one? 

Post#1 » by wiff » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:02 pm

If one and only one Sonic had to be traded who would you like to see gone the most(other than Clay)?

For me it's Luke.

As I said in a previous post Earl has shown more in these last 5 games than Luke has shown his entire career.

Luke is entering his prime and should be getting better, yet watching him he simply seems to be stuck in a rut.

I could live with Luke going somewhere else and playing better, because I don't think even at his best he'll be all that great.
User avatar
Det the Threat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,384
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Location: Germany
   

 

Post#2 » by Det the Threat » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:24 pm

I think you're right in that Luke hasn't shown much for quite some time and that it wouldn't hurt us to trade him. It also seems pretty clear that he's lost the battle with Watson.

Though, i think the guy that has to go is Kurt Thomas, cause he's not going to be back with us anyways and could net us something solid in return or help us shed some money on Ridnour's or Watson's contracts.
BBen
Starter
Posts: 2,104
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2007

 

Post#3 » by BBen » Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:27 pm

I concur with Det 100%. While Ridnour has been a total loss since we drafted him, I don't see the PG position as having a logjam anywhere near as critical as the PF/C. As far as addition by subtraction goes I have to give it to KT. Following a close second is Nick Collison because I just hate his game (slow power forward without any power or blocking ability).
User avatar
big L
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,627
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 18, 2004

 

Post#4 » by big L » Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:54 pm

Good point for Kurt--he's the before the deadline trade (if we have to pick only one), although I love his game and his professionalism.

But Luke must go, too, and I'm afraid he won't be worth anything by the end of the year. He's proven to be an off the bench caliber player who is convinced that he's a starter. He obviously can't handle rebuilding, either. I'm beginning to think that Earl would be a good asset coming off the bench for someone like Rose (despite his starter's salary).
from ny, never been a fan of the knicks...
User avatar
Dick Tate
Analyst
Posts: 3,248
And1: 2,766
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

 

Post#5 » by Dick Tate » Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:37 pm

I'd love for Ridnour to go too, but I think there's a better chance that Watson has earned his way out of town and Luke will be the Sonics starting point come Thursday night. :-?
CatchNShoot
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,598
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 30, 2003

 

Post#6 » by CatchNShoot » Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:27 pm

Wally must go b/c his value will never be any higher. A grumpy, sulking Wally is not a pretty thing. Or should I say grumpier and sulkier?
CatchNShoot
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,598
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 30, 2003

 

Post#7 » by CatchNShoot » Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:27 pm

Wally must go b/c his value will never be any higher. A grumpy, sulking Wally is not a pretty thing. Or should I say grumpier and sulkier?
User avatar
Det the Threat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,384
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Location: Germany
   

 

Post#8 » by Det the Threat » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:23 pm

CatchNShoot wrote:Wally must go b/c his value will never be any higher. A grumpy, sulking Wally is not a pretty thing. Or should I say grumpier and sulkier?


I'm not sure about that one.
He'll be an expiring contract, starting this summer, and that's when i see his value being at an all time high.
nwsports253
Junior
Posts: 414
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 17, 2007

 

Post#9 » by nwsports253 » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:39 pm

Wallys value will be higher next season when his contract is going to be up.
BenjaminH
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

 

Post#10 » by BenjaminH » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:01 pm

I've been loyal to Ridnour for a while now, but it is getting harder. My only argument against trading him now is just that it would be a real "buy low" opportunity for teams. What do we honestly think we can get for him?
CatchNShoot
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,598
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 30, 2003

 

Post#11 » by CatchNShoot » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:14 pm

Hold on. If you are a playoff team and need an outside shooter for the playoff run, why wouldn't you want Wally, knowing full well that he can help you this year and will be a valuable trade asset next year? Isn't his value higher now than at the beginning of next season?
User avatar
Det the Threat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,384
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Location: Germany
   

 

Post#12 » by Det the Threat » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:20 pm

Not really.
Wally's got a huge contract and Presti surely doesn't wants to take on any longer contracts, which makes it hard for other teams to trade for him.
User avatar
Dick Tate
Analyst
Posts: 3,248
And1: 2,766
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

 

Post#13 » by Dick Tate » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:27 pm

The best bet for Wally being traded is now, imo. This summer, his expiring contract for next season will be more valuable to Presti than any other team, unless he packages Z with another player with a longer deal for a larger one-year contract.

Return to Seattle Supersonics Basketball