Mark Cuban

The place to discuss the history of Seattle Supersonics Basketball.

Moderator: Cactus Jack

TheUrbanZealot
Junior
Posts: 478
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

Mark Cuban 

Post#1 » by TheUrbanZealot » Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:08 am

Honestly, I see this guy as being the only person that can throw a wrench in @ the NBA Board of Governors meeting to approve the move...
BenjaminH
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

 

Post#2 » by BenjaminH » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:03 am

It is hard to gauge how he will behave since he became less public in Dallas. I really have no idea.
Sweezo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,215
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 12, 2001
       

 

Post#3 » by Sweezo » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:57 am

Pinning your hopes on the NBA Board of Governors, or one owner not personally involved in this team, seems like your setting yourself up for failure.
dirkforpres
RealGM
Posts: 12,020
And1: 7,967
Joined: Sep 13, 2005
   

 

Post#4 » by dirkforpres » Tue Apr 1, 2008 5:49 pm

Trust me, if Cuban wants something to happen, David Stern will do everything in his power to NOT make that happen. So if you are hoping that Cubes can make Stern the dictator change his mind, its wishful thinking. Take it from someone who's watched plenty of Dallas Mavericks. Its very unfortunate though, theres a lot of history with the Sonics and I hope they dont leave Seattle.
RBNICE
Ballboy
Posts: 48
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 30, 2005

 

Post#5 » by RBNICE » Wed Apr 9, 2008 8:19 pm

Sonics Move 29 yes 1 no
FARMERMAN10
Veteran
Posts: 2,754
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2005

 

Post#6 » by FARMERMAN10 » Wed Apr 9, 2008 10:37 pm

^was that supposed to contribute something to the discussion?
User avatar
AbdicatedReign
Pro Prospect
Posts: 814
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 22, 2007
Location: Emerald City

 

Post#7 » by AbdicatedReign » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:20 am

TheUrbanZealot
Junior
Posts: 478
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

 

Post#8 » by TheUrbanZealot » Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:27 am

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the vote have to be unanimous or close to unanimous?

Cuban could be our savior, and really he is the only one that would really make sense anyways...
User avatar
Det the Threat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,384
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Location: Germany
   

 

Post#9 » by Det the Threat » Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:55 am

TheUrbanZealot wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the vote have to be unanimous or close to unanimous?

Cuban could be our savior, and really he is the only one that would really make sense anyways...


No that vote deosn't has to be unanimous.
It's enough if there's one more yes/no vote.

Though, those guys tend to help themselves out and we shouldn't expect anything else then a 28-1 or 27-2(i doubt Bennett gets to vote on this one) in favour of Bennett's wish.
The Guilty Party
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,697
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 26, 2002
Location: Zoo Jersey
 

 

Post#10 » by The Guilty Party » Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:28 am

Hopefully some other owners will publicly state that they feel the same way as Cuban although it's unlikely. Cuban brings up a good point though. Moving a team out of the 14th largest market and creating a "dustbowl division" as Cuban calls it does not help the league.
W_HAMILTON
RealGM
Posts: 17,453
And1: 16,996
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
 

 

Post#11 » by W_HAMILTON » Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:46 am

Not to be a downer, but Cuban did and said the same things with the Charlotte Hornets relocation, and it didn't do a lot of good.

The vote was 28-1, though.

That one vote was actually from the Grizzlies' owner, who was said to attach "conditions" to his vote, which in turn basically caused it to be listed as a "no" vote.

Cuban said he would vote "no," and he ended up being one of the many to vote "yes." He went on a Charlotte radio show, and talked a nice game, and said he would do whatever it takes to keep the team in Charlotte, and this and that, and, well, we see what happened.

I think Cuban just likes to get his name in the headlines, and trying to look like someone's savior, when he won't be. If it's anything like the relocation of the Hornets, he's probably more upset that the relocating team will be near his team and might take away some fans, rather than keeping the team from relocating to begin with.

Hopefully he won't be as scummy to you guys as he was to us, and will actually follow through on his word and at least vote "no" this time around.
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
GreenOkie
Freshman
Posts: 90
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2005

 

Post#12 » by GreenOkie » Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:10 am

cuban just doesnt want to lose his oklahoma fan base, it is and always will be the bottom line with that guy, he sees it at a threat.
User avatar
bennith13
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,600
And1: 23
Joined: Jun 10, 2001
Location: Lake Washington

 

Post#13 » by bennith13 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:09 am

Maybe he realizes that bennett is a liar and OKC can't support a team over the years.

I am done trying to be even remotely nice to anyone associated with anything OKC. Every time I try to engage one of you guys either here or on your site for a decent conversation I get met with anger.
colombianbrew
Senior
Posts: 656
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC

 

Post#14 » by colombianbrew » Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:22 pm

I think I remember Cuban discussing the Grizzlies and basically saying even though he disagreed, there was no point voting no because it would pass regardless
BenjaminH
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,485
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

 

Post#15 » by BenjaminH » Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:47 pm

Not wanting to lose the Oklahoma fan base is actually a good reason that I hadn't thought of. A big part of the Dallas fan base is from Oklahoma, isn't it? (I don't know for sure, but that sounds very plausible.) Of course, he can also have other reasons as Bennith mentions.

Return to Seattle Supersonics Basketball